Suppr超能文献

单独对左侧背外侧前额叶皮层进行阴极或阳极经颅直流电刺激,或在适度有氧运动期间进行该刺激,均不会调节执行功能。

Neither Cathodal nor Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex alone or Applied During Moderate Aerobic Exercise Modulates Executive Function.

作者信息

Thomas F, Pixa N H, Berger A, Cheng M-Y, Doppelmayr M, Steinberg F

机构信息

Institute for Sport Science, Department for Sports Psychology, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Germany.

Institute of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Department for Neuromotor Behavior and Training, Westfälische Wilhelms University Münster, Germany.

出版信息

Neuroscience. 2020 Sep 1;443:71-83. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.07.017. Epub 2020 Jul 16.

Abstract

There is converging evidence that both aerobic exercise (AE) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can acutely modulate executive functions (EF). In addition, recent studies have proposed the beneficial effects of applying tDCS during AE on physical performance. This study aimed to investigate whether tDCS applied during an AE session additionally or differently effects EF. Therefore, five experiments were conducted in a counterbalanced pre-post-retention crossover design to explore the acute effects of tDCS and AE on EF (inhibition and updating) once in isolation (i.e., either cathodal, anodal tDCS or AE alone as controls) and once in a combined application (i.e., anodal and cathodal tDCS during AE versus sham tDCS during AE). No differences were found in any experiment in the cognitive test parameters. However, in the case of anodal tDCS vs. sham during AE, heart rate was significantly affected. For cathodal tDCS vs. sham during AE, a significant Anova interaction indicated that cathodal tDCS during AE slightly reduced ratings of perceived exertion. The nonsignificant effects of tDCS on EFs are in contrast to previous studies, as no replication of existing observations could be achieved. Thus, the protocol applied in this study does not provide any strong evidence that a combination of AE and tDCS has any effects on EFs, but indicates effects on physiological parameters and subjective exhaustion ratings. Further research should consider changes in AE and tDCS parameters (e.g., intensity or exercise mode) and sequence of applications (online vs. offline).

摘要

越来越多的证据表明,有氧运动(AE)和经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)都可以急性调节执行功能(EF)。此外,最近的研究提出了在有氧运动期间应用经颅直流电刺激对身体表现的有益影响。本研究旨在调查在有氧运动期间应用经颅直流电刺激是否会额外或不同地影响执行功能。因此,进行了五项实验,采用平衡的前后保留交叉设计,以探索经颅直流电刺激和有氧运动对执行功能(抑制和更新)的急性影响,一次是单独进行(即阴极、阳极经颅直流电刺激或单独的有氧运动作为对照),一次是联合应用(即有氧运动期间阳极和阴极经颅直流电刺激与有氧运动期间假经颅直流电刺激)。在任何实验中,认知测试参数均未发现差异。然而,在有氧运动期间阳极经颅直流电刺激与假刺激的情况下,心率受到显著影响。在有氧运动期间阴极经颅直流电刺激与假刺激的情况下,显著的方差分析交互作用表明,有氧运动期间阴极经颅直流电刺激略微降低了主观用力感觉评分。经颅直流电刺激对执行功能的无显著影响与先前的研究形成对比,因为无法重复现有的观察结果。因此,本研究中应用的方案没有提供任何有力证据表明有氧运动和经颅直流电刺激的组合对执行功能有任何影响,但表明对生理参数和主观疲劳评分有影响。进一步的研究应考虑有氧运动和经颅直流电刺激参数(如强度或运动模式)的变化以及应用顺序(在线与离线)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验