Suppr超能文献

健康人群中,前额叶高频阴极经颅直流电刺激只有与适度的有氧运动相结合时才能调节执行功能。

Prefrontal high definition cathodal tDCS modulates executive functions only when coupled with moderate aerobic exercise in healthy persons.

机构信息

Department for Sports Psychology, Institute for Sport Science, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Albert Schweitzer Straße 22, 55128, Mainz, Germany.

School of Kinesiology, Louisiana State University, 1246 Pleasant Hall, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 19;11(1):8457. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87914-4.

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising tool to enhance cognitive performance. However, its effectiveness has not yet been unequivocally shown. Thus, here we tested whether coupling tDCS with a bout of aerobic exercise (AE) is more effective in modulating cognitive functions than tDCS or AE alone. One hundred twenty-two healthy participants were assigned to five randomized controlled crossover experiments. Two multimodal target experiments (EXP-4: anodal vs. sham tDCS during AE; EXP-5: cathodal vs. sham tDCS during AE) investigated whether anodal (a-tDCS) or cathodal tDCS (c-tDCS) applied during AE over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (left DLPFC) affects executive functioning (inhibition ability). In three unimodal control experiments, the participants were either stimulated (EXP-1: anodal vs. sham tDCS, EXP-2: cathodal vs. sham tDCS) or did AE (EXP-3: AE vs. active control). Participants performed an Eriksen flanker task during ergometer cycling at moderate intensity (in EXP. 3-5). Only c-tDCS during AE had a significant adverse effect on the inhibition task, with decreased accuracy. This outcome provides preliminary evidence that c-tDCS during AE over the left DLPFC might effectively modulate inhibition performance compared to c-tDCS alone. However, more systematic research is needed in the future.

摘要

经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是一种有前途的增强认知表现的工具。然而,其效果尚未得到明确证实。因此,我们在这里测试了将 tDCS 与有氧运动(AE)相结合是否比 tDCS 或 AE 单独使用更能调节认知功能。122 名健康参与者被分配到五个随机对照交叉实验中。两个多模态目标实验(EXP-4:AE 期间的阳极 vs. 假 tDCS;EXP-5:AE 期间的阴极 vs. 假 tDCS)研究了在左背外侧前额叶皮层(左 DLPFC)上进行的阳极(a-tDCS)或阴极 tDCS(c-tDCS)是否在 AE 期间影响执行功能(抑制能力)。在三个单模态对照实验中,参与者要么接受刺激(EXP-1:阳极 vs. 假 tDCS,EXP-2:阴极 vs. 假 tDCS),要么进行 AE(EXP-3:AE vs. 主动控制)。参与者在中等强度的测力计自行车运动期间执行 Eriksen 侧翼任务(在 EXP. 3-5 中)。只有 AE 期间的 c-tDCS 对抑制任务有显著的不利影响,准确性降低。这一结果提供了初步证据,表明与单独使用 c-tDCS 相比,AE 期间左 DLPFC 上的 c-tDCS 可能有效地调节抑制表现。然而,未来需要进行更多的系统性研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1380/8055664/44f768ea4ea1/41598_2021_87914_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验