Schreiter Marie L, Beste Christian
Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Germany.
Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Germany.
Cortex. 2020 Sep;130:231-245. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.06.002. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is marked by a range of challenges including cognitive and socio-emotional differences as well as difficulties to flexibly adjust to unpredictable situations. It has recently been suggested that people with ASD hold rigid expectations about upcoming events that tend to be shaped by information that is unlikely to repeat in the future. Prior expectations play an important role for proactive conflict control exemplified in the Gratton, or the congruency sequence effect (CSE). Here, we examine proactive cognitive-emotional conflict control in ASD compared to neuro-typical controls and the underlying neurophysiological and functional neuroanatomical processes using EEG methods and an emotional Stroop task with sequentially manipulated trial transitions. We show that, in ASD the presence of cognitive-emotional conflict in a previous trial affects the ability to process emotional conflict in a subsequent trial. That is, ASD individuals show a prominent CSE effect on emotional stimuli while neuro-typical controls do not. The neurophysiological data revealed that this proactive reconfiguration of stimulus-response associations during conflict resolution is associated with activation within anterior cingulate (BA24 and 32) and insular cortices (BA13). Purely perceptual, attentional and motor response-related processes could not explain these effects. Our results suggest that when faced with cognitive-emotional conflict, ASD individuals seem to rely on their subjective expectation about an upcoming trial type independent of the objective likelihood of that upcoming trial transition. The present results lend support to theoretical propositions on precision weighting of prediction error in ASD and have theoretical and clinical implications in the context of cognitive-emotional regulation and conflict control.
自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的特征是一系列挑战,包括认知和社会情感差异,以及难以灵活适应不可预测的情况。最近有人提出,患有ASD的人对即将发生的事件持有僵化的期望,这些期望往往由未来不太可能重复的信息所塑造。先前的期望在以格拉顿效应(Gratton)或一致性序列效应(CSE)为例的主动冲突控制中起着重要作用。在这里,我们使用脑电图方法和带有顺序操纵试验转换的情绪Stroop任务,研究与神经典型对照组相比,ASD患者的主动认知-情感冲突控制以及潜在的神经生理和功能性神经解剖过程。我们发现,在ASD中,前一次试验中认知-情感冲突的存在会影响后续试验中处理情感冲突的能力。也就是说,ASD个体在情绪刺激上表现出显著的CSE效应,而神经典型对照组则没有。神经生理学数据表明,在冲突解决过程中这种刺激-反应关联的主动重新配置与前扣带回(BA24和32)和岛叶皮质(BA13)内的激活有关。纯粹的感知、注意力和运动反应相关过程无法解释这些效应。我们的结果表明,当面对认知-情感冲突时,ASD个体似乎依赖于他们对即将到来的试验类型的主观期望,而与该即将到来的试验转换的客观可能性无关。目前的结果支持了关于ASD中预测误差精确加权的理论命题,并在认知-情感调节和冲突控制的背景下具有理论和临床意义。