Suppr超能文献

[2139例新型冠状病毒肺炎患者中医证候分布单组率的Meta分析]

[Meta-analysis of single-group rate of the distribution of traditional Chinese medicine syndromes in 2 139 patients with coronavirus disease 2019].

作者信息

Li Xuanlin, Liu Wenrui, He Wenqing, Xie Yang, Li Jiansheng

机构信息

Co-construction Collaborative Innovation Center for Chinese Medicine and Respiratory Diseases by Henan and Education Ministry of P.R. China/Henan Key Laboratory of Chinese Medicine for Respiratory Disease, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou 450046, Henan, China.

Department of Respiratory Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou 450000, Henan, China. Corresponding author: Li Jiansheng, Email:

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 Jun;32(6):664-670. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-202000509-00372.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To systematically evaluate the incidence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) syndrome in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), and to provide a basis for the standard of COVID-19 syndrome differentiation.

METHODS

CNKI, China Medical Journal Network, PubMed and Embase databases were searched by computer, and TCM syndrome data of COVID-19 cross-sectional surveys and case series were collected from the establishment of the database to March 31st in 2020. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted relevant data such as TCM syndromes, and evaluated the quality of the literature according to the quality assessment tool recommended by the JBI Evidence-Based Health Care Center. Stata 14.0 software was used to perform a single-group Meta-analysis of TCM syndromes.

RESULTS

Thirteen cross-sectional studies and 5 case series studies were included, with a total of 2 139 patients. The analysis of the cross-sectional studies showed that the risk bias was higher in the identification, control and accuracy of the confounding factors, and the description of the reliability and validity of the outcome indicators was unclear. The analysis of the case series studies showed that the overall risk bias was small, but there was a lack of a comprehensive description of the assessment when selecting patients. A total of 33 TCM syndromes of COVID-19 were sorted out by combining the TCM syndromes with the same disease position and pathogenic syndrome in the included 18 literatures, and there were 10 types of TCM syndromes of which the number of occurrences was ≥ 50, the incidence rate was ≥ 10%, and had statistical significance [indicated that 95% confidence interval (95%CI) didn't cross the meaningless line 0], including cold dampness syndrome (469 cases, incidence rate was 28.2%, 95%CI was 5.9%-50.6%), damp heat syndrome (247 cases, incidence rate was 32.1%, 95%CI was 10.7%-53.6%), epidemic closed lung syndrome (228 cases, incidence rate was 28.9%, 95%CI was 12.5%-45.2%), pulmonary and spleen Qi deficiency syndrome (202 cases, incidence rate was 22.1%, 95%CI was 9.5%-34.7%), dampness stagnation lung syndrome (180 cases, incidence rate was 41.2%, 95%CI was 18.4%-64.1%), dampness obstructing lung and spleen syndrome (81 cases, incidence rate was 56.3%, 95%CI was 48.1%-64.4%), evil heat syndrome lung syndrome (76 cases, incidence rate was 31.1%, 95%CI was 25.3%-36.9%), dampness-blocking lung and stomach syndrome (70 cases, incidence rate was 13.4%, 95%CI was 10.4%-16.3%), heat poisoning lung closure syndrome (55 cases, incidence rate was 16.9%, 95%CI was 8.3%-25.5%), and Qi-Yin deficiency syndrome (53 cases, incidence rate was 13.7%, 95%CI was 2.7%-24.8%). Subgroup analysis showed that there were 6 types of TCM syndromes that met the above conditions in cross-sectional studies, namely cold and damp lung syndrome (200 cases, incidence rate was 20.9%, 95%CI was 12.6%-29.2%), damp heat syndrome (221 cases, incidence rate was 41.8%, 95%CI was 9.4%-74.2%), dampness-disease lung syndrome (120 cases, incidence rate was 41.4%, 95%CI was 8.6%-74.3%), lung and spleen Qi deficiency syndrome (115 cases, incidence rate was 19.2%, 95%CI was 6.8%-31.7%), heat-fever lung syndrome (76 cases, incidence rate was 31.1%, 95%CI was 25.3%-36.9%) and Qi-Yin deficiency syndrome (53 cases, incidence rate was 13.7%, 95%CI was 2.7%-24.8%). There were 3 kinds of TCM syndromes in case series studies, which were virus closed lung syndrome (133 cases, incidence rate was 44.0%, 95%CI was 24.5%-63.4%), lung and spleen Qi deficiency syndrome (87 cases, incidence rate was 38.7%, 95%CI was 32.3%-45.0%), and dampness and depression lung syndrome (60 cases, incidence rate was 40.6%, 95%CI was 29.3%-52.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

The TCM syndromes of COVID-19 syndrome were widely distributed and complex. The main TCM syndromes were cold dampness syndrome, damp heat syndrome, epidemic closed lung syndrome, pulmonary and spleen Qi deficiency syndrome, dampness stagnation lung syndrome, dampness obstructing lung and spleen syndrome, evil heat syndrome lung syndrome, dampness-blocking lung and stomach syndrome, heat poisoning lung closure syndrome, Qi-Yin deficiency syndrome, which can provide reference for the standard of TCM syndrome differentiation of COVID-19.

摘要

目的

系统评价2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)中医证候的发生率,为COVID-19辨证标准提供依据。

方法

通过计算机检索中国知网、中国医学期刊网、PubMed及Embase数据库,收集自建库至2020年3月31日COVID-19横断面调查和病例系列的中医证候数据。由两名研究人员独立筛选文献,提取中医证候等相关数据,并根据JBI循证卫生保健中心推荐的质量评价工具对文献质量进行评价。采用Stata 14.0软件对中医证候进行单组Meta分析。

结果

纳入横断面研究13项、病例系列研究5项,共2139例患者。横断面研究分析显示,混杂因素的识别、控制及准确性方面风险偏倚较高,结局指标的可靠性和有效性描述不清。病例系列研究分析显示,总体风险偏倚较小,但在患者选择时缺乏评估的全面描述。通过合并纳入的18篇文献中病位和病机相同者,共梳理出COVID-19中医证候33种;其中出现次数≥50次、发生率≥10%且有统计学意义[即95%置信区间(95%CI)不跨越无意义线0]者有10种,包括寒湿证(469例,发生率28.2%,95%CI为5.9% - 50.6%)、湿热证(247例,发生率32.1%,95%CI为10.7% - 53.6%)、疫闭肺证(228例,发生率28.9%,95%CI为12.5% - 45.2%)、肺脾气虚证(202例,发生率22.1%,95%CI为9.5% - 34.7%)、湿阻肺证(180例,发生率41.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验