Suppr超能文献

考察多创伤类型与正性记忆数量和现象学的关系。

Examining relations of polytraumatization typologies with positive memory count and phenomenology.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA.

Department of Behavioral & Social Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.

出版信息

Anxiety Stress Coping. 2021 Jan;34(1):107-120. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2020.1795644. Epub 2020 Jul 20.

Abstract

Most individuals experience multiple potentially traumatizing events (PTEs); hence, it is important to consider count and types of PTEs (polytraumatization) in relation to post-trauma health. Notably, no research has examined polytraumatization typologies in relation to positive memory count and phenomenology. We examined (1) latent subgroupings of individuals based on PTE endorsements; and (2) relation of the optimal latent class solution to positive memory count and phenomenology. Participants were 203 trauma-exposed adults (   35.40; 61.10 females); we used PTEs endorsed on the Life Events Checklist for as indicators for analyses. Latent class analyses indicated a three-class solution differing in quantity and quality of PTE types: Low Experience, Predominant Interpersonal PTEs, and Predominant Non-Interpersonal PTEs. Further, more positive memories predicted membership in the Low Experience vs. other classes; greater sensory details of a positive memory predicted membership in the Low Experience vs. the Predominant Interpersonal PTEs Classes; and greater accessibility of a positive memory predicted membership in the Predominant Interpersonal PTEs vs. the Predominant Non-Interpersonal PTEs Classes. Results indicated three meaningful subgroups endorsing differing levels/types of PTEs; count, sensory details, and accessibility of positive memories, pending further investigation, may differentiate these subgroups.

摘要

大多数人都会经历多次潜在的创伤性事件(PTEs);因此,考虑 PTE 的数量和类型(多创伤)与创伤后健康之间的关系非常重要。值得注意的是,没有研究探讨过多创伤化类型与积极记忆数量和现象学之间的关系。我们检查了(1)根据 PTE 认可情况对个体进行潜在的亚组分类;以及(2)最佳潜在类别解决方案与积极记忆数量和现象学之间的关系。参与者为 203 名创伤暴露的成年人(年龄中位数为 35.40 岁,女性占 61.10%);我们使用生活事件清单上认可的 PTE 作为分析指标。潜在类别分析表明,存在三种不同数量和质量 PTE 类型的类别解决方案:低体验、主要人际 PTE 和主要非人际 PTE。此外,更多的积极记忆预测了低体验组与其他组的成员身份;积极记忆的感官细节越多,预测了低体验组与主要人际 PTE 组的成员身份;积极记忆的可及性越高,预测了主要人际 PTE 组与主要非人际 PTE 组的成员身份。结果表明,三个有意义的亚组认可了不同水平/类型的 PTE;积极记忆的数量、感官细节和可及性,有待进一步研究,可能会区分这些亚组。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88a4/7769926/c129c63928e1/nihms-1617682-f0001.jpg

相似文献

3
Examination of polytrauma typologies: A latent class analysis approach.创伤类型分析:潜在类别分析方法。
Psychiatry Res. 2017 Sep;255:111-118. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.05.026. Epub 2017 May 17.

本文引用的文献

4
Positive Internal Experiences in PTSD Interventions: A Critical Review.创伤后应激障碍干预中的积极内体验:批判性评价。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2022 Jan;23(1):101-116. doi: 10.1177/1524838020925784. Epub 2020 May 29.
9
Posttraumatic stress disorder and positive memories: Clinical considerations.创伤后应激障碍与积极记忆:临床思考。
J Anxiety Disord. 2018 Aug;58:23-32. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.06.007. Epub 2018 Jun 25.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验