• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤后应激障碍症状群与正性记忆特征的关系:网络视角。

Relation between PTSD symptom clusters and positive memory characteristics: A network perspective.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA.

Department of Community Mental Health, University of Haifa, Israel.

出版信息

J Anxiety Disord. 2020 Jan;69:102157. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2019.102157. Epub 2019 Nov 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2019.102157
PMID:31751918
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6960352/
Abstract

Positive memory characteristics relate to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) severity. We utilized a network approach to examine relations between PTSD clusters (intrusions, avoidance, negative alterations in cognitions and mood [NACM], alterations in arousal and reactivity [AAR]) and positive memory characteristics (count, accessibility, valence, vividness, coherence, time perspective, sensory details). We identified differential relations between PTSD clusters and positive memory characteristics, and central/bridging symptoms. Participants were an Amazon Mechanical Turk-recruited sample of 206 individuals (M = 35.36; 61.20% females). We estimated a regularized Gaussian Graphic Model comprising four nodes representing the PTSD clusters and six nodes representing positive memory characteristics. Regarding cross-community relations, AAR (highest node strength) was negatively associated with positive memory count, valence, coherence, and accessibility; avoidance was positively and negatively associated with positive memory vividness and count respectively. The NACM-AAR and intrusion-avoidance edges were significantly stronger than most edges. From the PTSD community, AAR and avoidance had the highest bridge strength and bridge expected influence respectively; from the positive memory community, coherence and vividness had the highest bridge strength and bridge expected influence respectively. Results indicate the potential pivotal role of AAR, avoidance, coherence, and vividness in the PTSD-positive memory relation, which renders them assessment/treatment targets pending further investigation.

摘要

积极记忆特征与创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)严重程度有关。我们采用网络方法来研究 PTSD 集群(侵入、回避、认知和情绪的负性改变[NACM]、觉醒和反应性改变[AAR])与积极记忆特征(数量、可及性、效价、生动性、连贯性、时间观、感官细节)之间的关系。我们确定了 PTSD 集群和积极记忆特征以及核心/桥梁症状之间的差异关系。参与者是亚马逊 Mechanical Turk 招募的 206 名个体(M=35.36;61.20%为女性)的样本。我们估计了一个包含四个节点的正则化高斯图形模型,代表 PTSD 集群,以及六个节点代表积极记忆特征。关于交叉社区关系,AAR(最高节点强度)与积极记忆数量、效价、连贯性和可及性呈负相关;回避与积极记忆生动性和数量分别呈正相关和负相关。NACM-AAR 和侵入回避边缘明显强于大多数边缘。从 PTSD 社区来看,AAR 和回避具有最高的桥接强度和桥接预期影响;从积极记忆社区来看,连贯性和生动性具有最高的桥接强度和桥接预期影响。结果表明,AAR、回避、连贯性和生动性在 PTSD-积极记忆关系中具有潜在的关键作用,这使它们成为评估/治疗的目标,有待进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Relation between PTSD symptom clusters and positive memory characteristics: A network perspective.创伤后应激障碍症状群与正性记忆特征的关系:网络视角。
J Anxiety Disord. 2020 Jan;69:102157. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2019.102157. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
2
Extending our understanding of the association between posttraumatic stress disorder and positive emotion dysregulation: A network analysis approach.拓展我们对创伤后应激障碍与积极情绪失调之间关联的理解:网络分析方法。
J Anxiety Disord. 2020 Apr;71:102198. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102198. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
3
Relation of positive memory recall count and accessibility with post-trauma mental health.正性记忆回忆量和可及性与创伤后心理健康的关系。
Memory. 2019 Sep;27(8):1130-1143. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2019.1628994. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
4
Relations Between Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms and Positive Memory Characteristics Among Women Reporting Intimate Partner Violence: A Micro-Longitudinal Study.创伤后应激障碍症状与报告亲密伴侣暴力的女性积极记忆特征之间的关系:一项微观纵向研究。
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Jun;38(11-12):7266-7295. doi: 10.1177/08862605221143200. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
5
Posttraumatic stress disorder clusters and suicidal ideation.创伤后应激障碍聚类与自杀意念。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Dec;270:238-245. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.09.030. Epub 2018 Sep 15.
6
DSM-5 PTSD symptom clusters and suicidal ideation in veterans.DSM-5 PTSD 症状群与退伍军人自杀意念。
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jun;288:112942. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112942. Epub 2020 Apr 12.
7
Trauma, posttraumatic stress disorder severity, and positive memories.创伤、创伤后应激障碍严重程度与积极记忆。
Memory. 2020 Sep;28(8):998-1013. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2020.1809679. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
8
Moderating effects of sleep difficulties on relations between posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and positive memory count.睡眠困难对创伤后应激障碍症状与正性记忆数量之间关系的调节作用。
J Clin Psychol. 2021 Sep;77(9):2057-2076. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23142. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
9
Dynamic Network Analysis of Negative Emotions and DSM-5 Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Clusters During Conflict.冲突期间负性情绪和 DSM-5 创伤后应激障碍症状群的动态网络分析
J Trauma Stress. 2020 Feb;33(1):72-83. doi: 10.1002/jts.22433. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
10
Do positive memory characteristics influence daily-level trajectories of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms? an exploratory daily diary study.积极记忆特征是否会影响创伤后应激障碍症状的日常水平轨迹?一项探索性的日常日记研究。
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2023 May;36(3):320-338. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2022.2075856. Epub 2022 May 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Therapeutic impacts of recalling and processing positive autobiographical memories on posttrauma health: An open-label study.回忆和处理积极自传体记忆对创伤后健康的治疗影响:一项开放标签研究。
J Trauma Stress. 2025 Apr;38(2):317-329. doi: 10.1002/jts.23129. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
2
Beyond trauma: a review of content and linguistic characteristics of nontrauma narratives in posttraumatic stress disorder.超越创伤:创伤后应激障碍中非创伤性叙述的内容和语言特征综述。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2407733. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2407733. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
3
The Effects of the Processing of Positive Memories Technique on Posttrauma Affect and Cognitions Among Survivors of Trauma: Protocol for a Daily Diary Study.积极记忆加工技术对创伤幸存者创伤后情感和认知的影响:一项日常日记研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Jan 12;13:e51838. doi: 10.2196/51838.
4
Positive Affect Processes and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms: Findings from an Open Label and Uncontrolled Pilot Study using the Positive Memory Processing Technique.积极情感过程与创伤后应激障碍症状:一项使用积极记忆处理技术的开放标签非对照试验研究结果
J Psychother Integr. 2023 Mar;33(1):102-122. doi: 10.1037/int0000292. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
5
Associations between positive memory count and hazardous substance use in a trauma-exposed sample: Examining the moderating role of emotion dysregulation.创伤暴露样本中积极记忆计数与危险物质使用之间的关联:检验情绪调节障碍的调节作用。
J Clin Psychol. 2023 May;79(5):1480-1508. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23495. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
6
Do positive memory characteristics influence daily-level trajectories of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms? an exploratory daily diary study.积极记忆特征是否会影响创伤后应激障碍症状的日常水平轨迹?一项探索性的日常日记研究。
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2023 May;36(3):320-338. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2022.2075856. Epub 2022 May 13.
7
Clusters of Trauma Types as Measured by the Life Events Checklist for DSM-5.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版生活事件清单所衡量的创伤类型集群。
Int J Stress Manag. 2020 Nov;27(4):380-393. doi: 10.1037/str0000179. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
8
Processing of Positive Memories Technique (PPMT) for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Primer.创伤后应激障碍的积极记忆处理技术(PPMT):入门指南。
J Psychother Integr. 2021 Jun;31(2):195-207. doi: 10.1037/int0000239. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
9
Moderating effects of sleep difficulties on relations between posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and positive memory count.睡眠困难对创伤后应激障碍症状与正性记忆数量之间关系的调节作用。
J Clin Psychol. 2021 Sep;77(9):2057-2076. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23142. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
10
Examining relations of polytraumatization typologies with positive memory count and phenomenology.考察多创伤类型与正性记忆数量和现象学的关系。
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2021 Jan;34(1):107-120. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2020.1795644. Epub 2020 Jul 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Relation of positive memory recall count and accessibility with post-trauma mental health.正性记忆回忆量和可及性与创伤后心理健康的关系。
Memory. 2019 Sep;27(8):1130-1143. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2019.1628994. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
2
Bridge Centrality: A Network Approach to Understanding Comorbidity.桥中心度:一种理解共病的网络方法。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2021 Mar-Apr;56(2):353-367. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2019.1614898. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
3
Invariance of the Construct of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Systematic Review.创伤后应激障碍结构不变性的系统评价。
J Trauma Stress. 2019 Apr;32(2):287-298. doi: 10.1002/jts.22389. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
4
The Study of Psychopathology from the Network Analysis Perspective: A Systematic Review.从网络分析角度研究精神病理学:系统评价。
Psychother Psychosom. 2019;88(2):71-83. doi: 10.1159/000497425. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
5
An Examination of the Role of Difficulties Regulating Positive Emotions in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.积极情绪调节困难在创伤后应激障碍中的作用研究
J Trauma Stress. 2018 Oct;31(5):775-780. doi: 10.1002/jts.22330. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
6
Does centrality in a cross-sectional network suggest intervention targets for social anxiety disorder?横向网络中的中心性是否提示了社交焦虑障碍的干预靶点?
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2018 Oct;86(10):831-844. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000336.
7
Relations between PTSD and depression symptom clusters in samples differentiated by PTSD diagnostic status.创伤后应激障碍和抑郁症状群在根据 PTSD 诊断状态区分的样本中的关系。
J Anxiety Disord. 2018 Oct;59:17-26. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
8
Posttraumatic stress disorder and positive memories: Clinical considerations.创伤后应激障碍与积极记忆:临床思考。
J Anxiety Disord. 2018 Aug;58:23-32. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.06.007. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
9
Don't blame the model: Reconsidering the network approach to psychopathology.别责怪模型:重新思考精神病理学的网络方法。
Psychol Rev. 2018 Jul;125(4):606-615. doi: 10.1037/rev0000108.
10
A network analysis of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder and functional impairment in UK treatment-seeking veterans.DSM-5 创伤后应激障碍与英国寻求治疗的退伍军人功能障碍的网络分析。
J Anxiety Disord. 2018 Jun;57:7-15. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.05.007. Epub 2018 May 28.