Fara G M, Panà A, Signorelli C, Mancinelli S, Marazzi M C, Palombi L
I Cattedra di Igiene, Università di Roma La Sapienza.
Parassitologia. 1988 Jan-Apr;30(1):71-9.
Records of clinical assistance and of post-exposure antirabies prophylaxis from 4820 outpatients who attended the Antirabies Center of Rome following animal bites in 1986 were analysed. We observed a high proportion of people submitted to active immunization (44% received at least one shot of HDCV vaccine) in spite of the fact that rabies is absent from Central Italy since many decades in both wild and domestic animals. These considerations suggest the opportunity of a major revision of the official recommendations for rabies prevention, and we feel that different policies should be adopted in rabies enzootic areas (such as Northern Italy) compared to those where the risk is only potential. Immunization should be avoided after bites by rodents; passive immunization should be added to the vaccine after bites by wild animals in enzootic areas, while bites by cats and dogs, even uncaptured, will not be necessarily followed by vaccination in non enzootic areas.
对1986年在罗马抗狂犬病中心因动物咬伤前来就诊的4820名门诊患者的临床救助记录和暴露后抗狂犬病预防记录进行了分析。我们观察到,尽管几十年来意大利中部的野生动物和家畜中都没有狂犬病,但仍有很高比例的人接受了主动免疫(44%的人至少接种了一剂人二倍体细胞狂犬病疫苗)。这些情况表明有必要对官方的狂犬病预防建议进行重大修订,而且我们认为,与狂犬病仅为潜在风险的地区相比,在狂犬病地方流行区(如意大利北部)应采取不同的政策。被啮齿动物咬伤后应避免免疫;在地方流行区被野生动物咬伤后,应在疫苗接种的基础上增加被动免疫,而在非地方流行区,即使是未捕获的猫和狗咬伤后,也不一定需要接种疫苗。