Suppr超能文献

前庭核梗死:病例系列及文献复习。

Vestibular nuclear infarction: Case series and review of the literature.

机构信息

Ceyla Ataç, Izmir Bozyaka Egitim ve Arastirma Hastanesi, Neurology, 35360 İzmir, Ege, Turkey.

Ceyla Ataç, Izmir Bozyaka Egitim ve Arastirma Hastanesi, Neurology, 35360 İzmir, Ege, Turkey.

出版信息

J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Aug;29(8):104937. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104937. Epub 2020 Jun 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Acute vestibular syndrome (AVS) is a common cause of emergency admittance and has very rarely been reported due to a vestibular nucleus infarction. Initial magnetic resonance imaging studies (MRIs) including diffusion-weighted images may reveal normal results and even bedside examination tests like HINTS battery which involves head impulse test (HIT), nystagmus and test of skew can be challenging in differing a peripheral vestibulopathy from a central lesion.

METHODS

Four patients seen in the emergency department with AVS and evaluated with HINTS battery, cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMP) and cranial MRI revealing infarcts restricted to vestibular nuclei were evaluated.

RESULTS

In two patients spontaneous nystagmus beating towards the unaffected side was present. In one patient spontaneous nystagmus changed direction on looking to the affected side. In the fourth gaze evoked nystagmus was present without any spontaneous nystagmus. In all, HIT was positive to the affected side. In three cVEMPs was studied revealing delayed latency, reduced amplitude p13/n23 potentials on the lesioned side in two of them. Initial MRIs including diffusion-weighted images disclosed acute infarction in the area of the vestibular nuclei in two patients, with normal results in the other two. Follow-up MRI's performed 48 hours later revealed vestibular nuclear infarction.

CONCLUSION

It is not always easy to differentiate small lesions restricted to central vestibular structures from peripheral vestibular lesions both on clinical and radiological grounds. Follow-up cranial MRI is necessary in patients with known vascular risk factors.

摘要

背景与目的

急性前庭综合征(AVS)是急诊常见的病因,且由于前庭核梗死导致的 AVS 极为罕见。最初的磁共振成像研究(MRI),包括弥散加权成像,可能会显示正常结果,即使是床边检查测试,如包含头脉冲测试(HIT)、眼震和偏斜测试的 HINTS 电池,在区分周围前庭病变和中枢病变方面也具有挑战性。

方法

我们评估了 4 例在急诊就诊的 AVS 患者,这些患者接受了 HINTS 电池、颈性前庭诱发肌源性电位(cVEMP)和颅 MRI 检查,结果显示局限于前庭核的梗死。

结果

在 2 例患者中,自发性眼震向未受累侧摆动。在 1 例患者中,自发性眼震在向受累侧注视时改变了方向。在第 4 例患者中,存在凝视诱发的眼震,而没有自发性眼震。在所有患者中,HIT 均对侧阳性。在 3 例 cVEMP 中,研究显示延迟潜伏期,在其中 2 例病变侧的 p13/n23 波幅降低。最初的 MRI,包括弥散加权成像,在 2 例患者中显示了前庭核区的急性梗死,在另外 2 例患者中结果正常。48 小时后进行的随访 MRI 显示了前庭核梗死。

结论

在临床和影像学方面,区分局限于中枢前庭结构的小病变与周围前庭病变并不总是那么容易。对于有已知血管危险因素的患者,需要进行随访颅 MRI。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验