Di Nardo Dario, Miccoli Gabriele, Mazzoni Alessandro, Seracchiani Marco, Gambarini Gianluca, Testarelli Luca
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy, Phone: +39 3343795174, e-mail:
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020 May 1;21(5):539-542.
The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of the flat design compared with a non-flat designed instrument on the centering ability in a simulated root canal system.
Two file systems were chosen: the F-One (Fanta Dental, Shanghai, China) and a prototype with the same design but without the flat-side design. A total of 50 simulated L-shaped root canals in resin blocks were shaped with a new instrument each. Pre- and postcanal preparation images were captured and superimposed to measure and compare the canal transportation and evaluate the centering ability of each file. The test was performed and the level of significance was set at < 0.05.
Prototype files removed significantly less resin from the inner and the outer parts of the canal and showed significantly higher mean transportation values.
It can be concluded that the F-One file system demonstrated better shaping ability compared with the prototype file system in L-shaped resin-simulated canals.
The present study showed the safety of the flat-side design, minimizing the risk of iatrogenic errors such as ledging, perforation, or zipping of the root canal.
本研究的目的是调查与非平面设计器械相比,平面设计器械在模拟根管系统中的定心能力。
选择两种锉系统:F-One(上海方达齿科,中国)和一种设计相同但无平面设计的原型锉。用每种新器械对树脂块中的50个模拟L形根管进行预备。采集根管预备前后的图像并叠加,以测量和比较根管偏移情况,并评估每种锉的定心能力。进行了该测试,显著性水平设定为<0.05。
原型锉从根管内部和外部去除的树脂明显更少,并且平均偏移值显著更高。
可以得出结论,在L形树脂模拟根管中,F-One锉系统与原型锉系统相比显示出更好的成形能力。
本研究表明了平面设计的安全性,将诸如根管台阶、穿孔或根管壁拉链等医源性错误的风险降至最低。