Peraça Victor de Ornelas, Xavier Samantha Rodrigues, de Almeida Gomes Fabio, Dos Santos Luciane Geanini Pena, Souza Erick Miranda, Pappen Fernanda Geraldo
Graduation Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Department of Endodontics, Universidade de Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Restor Dent Endod. 2021 Apr 29;46(2):e28. doi: 10.5395/rde.2021.46.e28. eCollection 2021 May.
This study evaluated the effect of repeated uses and autoclaving in the instrumented area, fracture resistance, and time of instrumentation of thermally treated nickel-titanium reciprocating systems.
Two hundred simulated canals were instrumented using Reciproc Blue and WaveOne Gold. Each file was used up to 10 times or until fracture. The instrumented area was measured in pre- and post-operative images, using ImageJ software. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis evaluated the number of uses of instruments before fracture. Instrumented area and time of instrumentation were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis. Correlations among the number of uses and instrumented area were measured. The level of statistical significance was set at < 0.05.
Reciproc Blue presented a higher estimated number of uses in comparison with WaveOne Gold ( = 0.026), but autoclaving did not affect the resistance to fracture of instruments ( > 0.05). The instrumented area was different among the evaluated groups ( = 0.039), and the instrumented area along the uses of both tested instruments was reduced. With the time of instrumentation, there was also a significant difference among the evaluated groups; the groups without sterilization cycles were faster, in comparison to those submitted to autoclaving ( = 0.010).
Reciproc Blue was more resistant than WaveOne Gold, suffering later fracture. Additionally, the sterilization cycles did not influence the estimated number of uses of thermally treated reciprocating instruments, but the instrumented area of root canals was reduced along with the repeated uses of both instruments.
本研究评估了热加工镍钛往复式系统在器械预备区域的重复使用和高压灭菌对器械抗折断性及预备时间的影响。
使用Reciproc Blue和WaveOne Gold对200个模拟根管进行预备。每个锉最多使用10次或直至折断。使用ImageJ软件在术前和术后图像中测量器械预备区域。采用Kaplan-Meier生存分析评估器械折断前的使用次数。通过Mann-Whitney U检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验分析器械预备区域和预备时间。测量使用次数与器械预备区域之间的相关性。设定统计学显著性水平为<0.05。
与WaveOne Gold相比,Reciproc Blue的估计使用次数更高(=0.026),但高压灭菌不影响器械的抗折断性(>0.05)。评估组之间的器械预备区域不同(=0.039),且两种测试器械在使用过程中器械预备区域均减小。随着预备时间的延长,评估组之间也存在显著差异;与经过高压灭菌的组相比,未进行灭菌循环的组预备速度更快(=0.010)。
Reciproc Blue比WaveOne Gold更抗折断,折断时间更晚。此外,灭菌循环不影响热加工往复式器械的估计使用次数,但随着两种器械的重复使用,根管的器械预备区域减小。