• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小肾肿块侵入性治疗后的并发症与失血:一项系统评价

Complications and blood loss after invasive treatments for small renal masses A systematic review.

作者信息

Kandi Maryam, Richard Patrick O, Violette Philippe D, Sreekanta Ashwini, Hanna Steven, Couban Rachel, Daza Julian, Leong Russell, Faisal Haseeb, Tamilselvan Divyalakshmi, Steen Jeremy, Tang Wang-Choi, Singh Jaswinder, Guyatt Gordon

机构信息

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS and University of Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Can Urol Assoc J. 2025 Apr;19(4):136-144. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.8970.

DOI:10.5489/cuaj.8970
PMID:39661185
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11973990/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This systematic review and meta-analysis provides estimates of major complications and estimated blood loss (EBL) for open partial nephrectomy (OPN), conventional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN), and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). Additionally, it outlines the incidence of major complications associated with percutaneous thermal ablation (TA) in patients with small renal masses (SRMs).

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL from inception to the end of July 2023. We supplemented the electronic search with a hand search of the references in the included studies and suggestions from two content experts. We used random effect meta-analysis to obtain pooled estimates of major complications and EBL. We used the QUIPS tool for risk of bias assessment and applied a prognosis approach to rate the quality of evidence using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework.

RESULTS

We included 65 eligible studies that provided pooled estimates of major complications after OPN of 5.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.9-9.9); after conventional LPN of 4.7% (95% CI 2.6-8.3); after RAPN of 2.9% (95% CI 2.2-3.7); and after TA of 2.5% (95% CI 1.7-3.6). Pooled estimates demonstrating mean EBL of 262 ml (95% CI 200-324) for OPN; 224 ml (95% CI 193-254) for conventional LPN; and 163 ml (95% CI 136-190) for RAPN.

CONCLUSIONS

This review provides the best available estimates of major complications and mean EBL after partial nephrectomy in patients with SRMs.

摘要

引言

本系统评价和荟萃分析提供了开放性部分肾切除术(OPN)、传统腹腔镜部分肾切除术(LPN)和机器人辅助部分肾切除术(RAPN)的主要并发症及估计失血量(EBL)的评估。此外,还概述了小肾肿块(SRM)患者经皮热消融(TA)相关主要并发症的发生率。

方法

我们检索了从创刊至2023年7月底的MEDLINE、EMBASE和CINAHL数据库。我们通过人工检索纳入研究中的参考文献以及两位内容专家的建议来补充电子检索。我们使用随机效应荟萃分析来获得主要并发症和EBL的汇总估计值。我们使用QUIPS工具进行偏倚风险评估,并采用预后方法根据推荐分级、评估、制定和评价(GRADE)框架对证据质量进行评级。

结果

我们纳入了65项符合条件的研究,这些研究提供的汇总估计值显示,OPN后主要并发症的发生率为5.4%(95%置信区间[CI] 2.9 - 9.9);传统LPN后为4.7%(95% CI 2.6 - 8.3);RAPN后为2.9%(95% CI 2.2 - 3.7);TA后为2.5%(95% CI 1.7 - 3.6)。汇总估计值显示,OPN的平均EBL为262毫升(95% CI 200 - 324);传统LPN为224毫升(95% CI 193 - 254);RAPN为163毫升(95% CI 136 - 190)。

结论

本综述提供了SRM患者部分肾切除术后主要并发症和平均EBL的最佳可用评估。

相似文献

1
Complications and blood loss after invasive treatments for small renal masses A systematic review.小肾肿块侵入性治疗后的并发症与失血:一项系统评价
Can Urol Assoc J. 2025 Apr;19(4):136-144. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.8970.
2
Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for moderate to highly complex renal masses. A systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助的部分肾切除术治疗中度至高度复杂肾肿瘤。一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Indian J Urol. 2022 Jul-Sep;38(3):174-183. doi: 10.4103/iju.iju_393_21. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
3
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for localized renal tumors: a meta-analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜下局限性肾肿瘤部分肾切除术的Meta分析
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014 Dec 15;7(12):4770-9. eCollection 2014.
4
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies Reporting Perioperative Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy.机器人辅助部分肾切除术与开放性部分肾切除术围手术期结果比较研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Endourol. 2017 Sep;31(9):893-909. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0351. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
5
Length of hospital stay and procedure time after partial nephrectomy or percutaneous thermal ablation A systematic review and meta-analysis.肾部分切除术或经皮热消融术后的住院时间和手术时间:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Can Urol Assoc J. 2025 Mar;19(3):E104-E113. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.8906.
6
Lower Incidence of Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury in Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy Than in Open Partial Nephrectomy: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.机器人辅助部分肾切除术术后急性肾损伤发生率低于开放部分肾切除术:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
J Endourol. 2020 Jul;34(7):754-762. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0622. Epub 2020 May 28.
7
Open versus robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for highly complex renal masses: a meta-analysis of perioperitive and functional outcomes.开放手术与机器人辅助部分肾切除术治疗高度复杂肾肿瘤:围手术期和功能结局的荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Oct;17(5):1955-1965. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01652-5. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
8
Comparing the outcomes of open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a network meta-analysis.比较开放式、腹腔镜式和机器人辅助部分肾切除术的结果:一项网络荟萃分析。
BJU Int. 2023 Oct;132(4):353-364. doi: 10.1111/bju.16093. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
9
Radiofrequency ablation versus partial nephrectomy for the treatment of clinical stage 1 renal masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.射频消融术与部分肾切除术治疗临床1期肾肿瘤:系统评价与Meta分析
Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127(13):2497-503.
10
Trifecta Outcomes in Open, Laparoscopy or Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: Does the Surgical Approach Matter?开放手术、腹腔镜手术或机器人辅助部分肾切除术的三连胜结局:手术方式重要吗?
J Kidney Cancer VHL. 2019 May 13;6(1):8-12. doi: 10.15586/jkcvhl.2019.115. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Long term experience of robotic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy as the default approach in the management of renal masses: should the paradigm shift?机器人后腹腔镜肾部分切除术治疗肾肿瘤的长期经验:是否需要改变模式?
J Robot Surg. 2023 Oct;17(5):2001-2008. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01582-2. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
2
Comparison of open and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy approaches using multicentric data (UroCCR-47 study).多中心数据对比开放和机器人辅助部分肾切除术(UroCCR-47 研究)。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 8;12(1):18981. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22912-8.
3
Partial Nephrectomy versus Percutaneous Cryoablation of Small Renal Cell Carcinomas: A Comparison of Adverse Events in a Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study.小肾癌的部分肾切除术与经皮冷冻消融术比较:一项前瞻性多中心队列研究中的不良事件对比
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2022 Nov;33(11):1375-1383.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2022.07.007. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
4
Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with minimum follow-up of 5 years: A multi-center prospective study in Japan.机器人辅助部分肾切除术,随访时间至少 5 年:日本的一项多中心前瞻性研究。
Int J Urol. 2022 Sep;29(9):1038-1045. doi: 10.1111/iju.14960. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
5
A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing the Outcomes of Open vs Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy.一项比较开放与腹腔镜部分肾切除术疗效的前瞻性、随机试验。
J Urol. 2022 Aug;208(2):259-267. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002695. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
6
Preliminary Outcomes After Same Day Discharge Protocol for Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: A Single Centre Experience.机器人辅助部分肾切除术当天出院协议的初步结果:单中心经验。
Urology. 2022 Jun;164:145-150. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.03.021. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
7
European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: The 2022 Update.欧洲泌尿外科学会肾癌指南:2022 年更新版。
Eur Urol. 2022 Oct;82(4):399-410. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.03.006. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
8
Canadian Urological Association guideline: Management of small renal masses - Full-text.加拿大泌尿外科协会指南:小肾肿块的管理 - 全文
Can Urol Assoc J. 2022 Feb;16(2):E61-E75. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.7763.
9
Percutaneous ablation or minimally invasive partial nephrectomy for cT1a renal masses? A propensity score-matched analysis.经皮消融或微创部分肾切除术治疗 cT1a 期肾肿瘤?倾向评分匹配分析。
Int J Urol. 2022 Mar;29(3):222-228. doi: 10.1111/iju.14758. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
10
Renal Mass and Localized Renal Cancer: Evaluation, Management, and Follow-Up: AUA Guideline: Part I.肾脏肿块和局限性肾细胞癌:评估、管理和随访:AUA 指南:第 1 部分。
J Urol. 2021 Aug;206(2):199-208. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001911. Epub 2021 Jul 11.