Suppr超能文献

标准和超快速单光子发射计算机断层扫描/计算机断层扫描评估骨转移的观察者间和观察者内一致性。

Inter- and intraobserver agreement in standard and ultra-fast single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography for the assessment of bone metastases.

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital.

Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg.

出版信息

Nucl Med Commun. 2020 Oct;41(10):1005-1009. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001252.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate inter- and intraobserver agreement using standard (std)-single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) or ultra-fast acquisition (UF)-SPECT/CT as an add-on to planar whole-body bone scintigraphy (WB-BS) for the detection of bone metastases in patients with known cancer.

METHODS

Images from patients (n = 104) participating in a prospective trial comparing SPECT/CT as an add-on to WB-BS with two different acquisition methods (std-SPECT/CT; 20 s per view, 32 views and UF-SPECT/CT; 16 views of 10 s per view) were included. The combinations of WB-BS with the two different SPECT/CT acquisition methods were independently evaluated by two experienced observers using a three-point scale (M0: no metastases, Me: equivocal for bone metastases and M1: bone metastases). The observers re-evaluated the scans 6 months later. Inter- and intraobserver agreement was calculated using linear weighted kappa.

RESULTS

The linear weighted kappa for the interobserver agreement was 0.78 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61-0.94] for WB-BS with std-SPECT/CT and 0.84 (95% CI 0.67-1.00) for WB-BS with UF-SPECT/CT. Similar values were observed for the intraobserver agreement, in which the linear weighted kappa was 0.76 (95% CI 0.60-0.92) and 0.73 (95% CI 0.57-0.90) for std-SPECT/CT and UF-SPECT/CT, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Satisfactory inter- and intraobserver agreement was seen for both acquisition methods, emphasizing that the use of SPECT/CT as an add-on to WB-BS is a robust method for the detection of bone metastases even when conducted with a very short acquisition time.

摘要

目的

研究标准(std)-单光子发射计算机断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(SPECT/CT)或超快速采集(UF)-SPECT/CT 作为附加在全身骨闪烁显像(WB-BS)用于检测已知癌症患者的骨转移的两种方法的观察者内和观察者间一致性。

方法

纳入了参与前瞻性试验的患者(n=104)的图像,该试验比较了 SPECT/CT 作为附加在两种不同采集方法的 WB-BS 的一种方法(std-SPECT/CT;每视野 20 秒,共 32 视野和 UF-SPECT/CT;每视野 10 秒共 16 视野)。两位经验丰富的观察者使用三分制(M0:无转移,Me:可疑骨转移和 M1:骨转移)独立评估 WB-BS 与两种不同 SPECT/CT 采集方法的组合。观察者在 6 个月后重新评估扫描。使用线性加权 Kappa 计算观察者间和观察者内的一致性。

结果

观察者间一致性的线性加权 Kappa 为 WB-BS 联合 std-SPECT/CT 时为 0.78(95%置信区间 0.61-0.94),WB-BS 联合 UF-SPECT/CT 时为 0.84(95%置信区间 0.67-1.00)。观察者内一致性也观察到了相似的值,其中线性加权 Kappa 分别为 WB-BS 联合 std-SPECT/CT 时为 0.76(95%置信区间 0.60-0.92)和 WB-BS 联合 UF-SPECT/CT 时为 0.73(95%置信区间 0.57-0.90)。

结论

两种采集方法均具有令人满意的观察者内和观察者间一致性,这强调了即使采用非常短的采集时间,SPECT/CT 作为 WB-BS 的附加方法也是检测骨转移的一种可靠方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验