Tordrup David, van den Ham Hendrika A, Glanville Julie, Mantel-Teeuwisse Aukje K
Utrecht Centre for Pharmaceutical Policy and Regulation, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
York Health Economics Consortium, York, UK.
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2020 Jul 16;13:22. doi: 10.1186/s40545-020-00228-0. eCollection 2020.
High prices of pharmaceutical products are an increasing challenge in high- and low-income countries. Governments in many countries have implemented pricing policies to ensure affordability of medicines to patients and healthcare systems. The World Health Organization published in 2015 the Guideline on Country Pharmaceutical Pricing Policies, which was based on a series of evidence reviews in the preceding years.As part of the ongoing update of this guideline, we present a protocol for 10 systematic literature reviews on pharmaceutical pricing policies to be covered by the updated guideline.
The systematic literature reviews will be undertaken according to the principles embodied in the Cochrane Handbook and Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. The interventions studied are pharmaceutical pricing policies implemented by public institutions or a group of purchasing organizations/individuals (e.g. health services). Studies reporting price, volume, availability and/or affordability as the primary outcomes will be eligible for inclusion. Studies in any country or jurisdiction, in any language and in any setting published in 2004 or later are eligible. Eligible study designs are randomized and non-randomized trials, and observational studies including cohort studies, panel data analyses, comparative time series design (including interrupted time-series and repeated measures studies), and controlled before-after studies. A list of 21 databases of peer-reviewed and grey literature will be searched, along with supplementary searches of relevant national and international organizational and governmental websites. Risk of bias will be assessed according to the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) guidelines. A summary table according to the EPOC Worksheets for preparing a Summary of Findings table (SoF) using GRADE will be provided.
The results of the review will be used as part of the update of the WHO Guideline on Country Pharmaceutical Pricing Policies. The current protocol may serve as an example for performing systematic literature reviews to inform policy makers.
药品价格高昂在高收入和低收入国家都是日益严峻的挑战。许多国家的政府已实施定价政策,以确保患者和医疗系统能够负担得起药品。世界卫生组织于2015年发布了《国家药品定价政策指南》,该指南基于此前数年的一系列证据审查。作为该指南持续更新工作的一部分,我们提出了一项方案,用于对10项关于药品定价政策的系统文献综述进行研究,这些综述将纳入更新后的指南。
系统文献综述将根据Cochrane手册和综述与传播中心所体现的原则进行。所研究的干预措施是公共机构或一组采购组织/个人(如卫生服务机构)实施的药品定价政策。将价格、数量、可及性和/或可负担性作为主要结果进行报告的研究将符合纳入标准。2004年或之后在任何国家或司法管辖区、以任何语言、在任何环境下发表的研究均符合条件。符合条件的研究设计包括随机和非随机试验,以及观察性研究,包括队列研究、面板数据分析、比较时间序列设计(包括中断时间序列和重复测量研究)以及前后对照研究。将搜索21个同行评审和灰色文献数据库列表,并对相关国家和国际组织及政府网站进行补充搜索。将根据Cochrane有效实践和护理组织(EPOC)指南评估偏倚风险。将提供一份根据EPOC工作表制作的汇总表,用于使用GRADE编制结果总结表(SoF)。
综述结果将用作世界卫生组织《国家药品定价政策指南》更新工作的一部分。当前方案可为开展系统文献综述以告知政策制定者提供范例。