Rech Megan A, Horng Michelle, Holzhausen Jenna M, Van Berkel Megan A, Sokol Sarah S, Peppard Sarah, Hammond Drayton A
Department of Pharmacy, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL.
Crit Care Explor. 2020 Jun 9;2(6):e0132. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000132. eCollection 2020 Jun.
This survey sought to characterize the national prescribing patterns and barriers to the use of thrombolytic agents in the treatment of pulmonary embolism, with a specific focus on treatment during actual or imminent cardiac arrest.
A 19-question international, cross-sectional survey on thrombolytic use in pulmonary embolism was developed, validated, and administered. A multivariable logistic regression was conducted to determine factors predictive of utilization of thrombolytics in the setting of cardiac arrest secondary to pulmonary embolism.
International survey study.
Physicians, pharmacists, nurses, and other healthcare professionals who were members of the Society of Critical Care Medicine.
None.
Thrombolytic users were compared with nonusers. Respondents ( = 272) predominately were physicians (62.1%) or pharmacists (30.5%) practicing in an academic medical center (54.8%) or community teaching setting (24.6%). Thrombolytic users ( = 177; 66.8%) were compared with nonusers ( = 88; 33.2%) Thrombolytic users were more likely to work in pulmonary/critical care (80.2% thrombolytic use vs 59.8%; < 0.01) and emergency medicine (6.8% vs 3.5%; < 0.01). Users were more likely to have an institutional guideline or policy in place pertaining to the use of thrombolytics in cardiac arrest (27.8% vs 13.6%; < 0.01) or have a pulmonary embolism response team (38.6% vs 19.3%; < 0.01). Lack of evidence supporting use and the risk of adverse outcomes were barriers to thrombolytic use. Working in a pulmonary/critical care environment (odds ratio, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.24-4.52) and comfort level (odds ratio, 2.77; 95% CI, 1.7-4.53) were predictive of thrombolytic use in the multivariable analysis.
Most survey respondents used thrombolytics in the setting of cardiac arrest secondary to known or suspected pulmonary embolism. This survey study adds important data to the literature surrounding thrombolytics for pulmonary embolism as it describes thrombolytic user characteristic, barriers to use, and common prescribing practices internationally.
本调查旨在描述全国范围内肺栓塞治疗中溶栓药物的处方模式及使用障碍,特别关注在实际心脏骤停或即将发生心脏骤停时的治疗情况。
开展了一项关于肺栓塞溶栓药物使用的包含19个问题的国际横断面调查,进行了验证并实施。采用多变量逻辑回归分析以确定在肺栓塞继发心脏骤停情况下预测溶栓药物使用的因素。
国际调查研究。
危重病医学会的医生、药剂师、护士及其他医疗保健专业人员。
无。
对使用溶栓药物者与未使用者进行比较。受访者(n = 272)主要为在学术医疗中心(54.8%)或社区教学机构(24.6%)工作的医生(62.1%)或药剂师(30.5%)。将使用溶栓药物者(n = 177;66.8%)与未使用者(n = 88;33.2%)进行比较。使用溶栓药物者更有可能从事肺科/重症监护工作(溶栓药物使用者占80.2%,未使用者占59.8%;P < 0.01)以及急诊医学工作(分别为6.8%和3.5%;P < 0.01)。使用者更有可能有关于心脏骤停时使用溶栓药物的机构指南或政策(分别为27.8%和13.6%;P < 0.01)或有肺栓塞应对团队(分别为38.6%和19.3%;P < 0.01)。缺乏支持使用的证据以及不良后果风险是溶栓药物使用的障碍。在多变量分析中,在肺科/重症监护环境中工作(比值比,2.36;95%置信区间,1.24 - 4.52)和舒适度(比值比,2.77;95%置信区间,1.7 - 4.53)可预测溶栓药物的使用。
大多数调查受访者在已知或疑似肺栓塞继发心脏骤停的情况下使用了溶栓药物。这项调查研究为围绕肺栓塞溶栓药物的文献增添了重要数据,因为它描述了溶栓药物使用者特征、使用障碍以及国际上常见的处方做法。