Knies Andrea K, Zhang Qiang, Juthani Prerak, Tu Stephanie, Pach Jolanta, Martinez Aida, Monin Joan K, Hwang David Y
Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Division of Neurocritical Care and Emergency Neurology, Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Crit Care Explor. 2020 Jul 6;2(7):e0151. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000151. eCollection 2020 Jul.
To determine whether ICU surrogates with "insecure" psychologic attachment orientations are more prone to requesting tracheostomy and gastrostomy (i.e., life-sustaining therapy) for severe acute brain injury patients with poor prognosis compared to surrogates with "secure" orientations.
Cross-sectional survey from November 2017 to August 2018.
Single neuroscience ICU at an academic medical center.
Consecutive sample of surrogates of patients admitted to the ICU with a minimum length of stay of 24 hours.
None.
We identified surrogates' psychologic attachment orientation via a standard tool, the Relationship Questionnaire, and collected other surrogate and patient demographics. We also presented surrogates with a hypothetical scenario of an intubated severe acute brain injury patient with poor prognosis and asked each surrogate whether he or she would request life-sustaining therapy or comfort measures only. Fisher exact test was used to compare frequency of life-sustaining therapy selection between secure and insecure surrogates. Additionally, we conducted univariate and multivariate analyses to determine other independent predictors of life-sustaining therapy selection. Two-hundred seventy-five of 713 (38.6%) eligible respondents participated; 153 (55.6%) surrogates were secure, and 122 (44.4%) insecure. There was no significant difference in the proportion of secure respondents selecting life-sustaining therapy compared to insecure (18.3% vs 20.5%; = 0.38). Although still nonsignificant, the observed difference was slightly greater for those with a specific "anxious" insecure subtype versus "nonanxious" (18.2% vs 23.0%; = 0.41). Overall, a higher proportion of respondents selecting life-sustaining therapy (vs comfort measures only) reported feeling uncertain or very uncertain about the hypothetical decision (45.3% vs 9.5%; < 0.001). In a multivariate model, nonwhite race and high religiosity were significant predictors of life-sustaining therapy selection.
Although surrogate attachment orientation is not predictive of life-sustaining therapy selection, nonwhite race and high religiosity are. Future interventions designed to support severe acute brain injury surrogates could focus on surrogates prone to selecting life-sustaining therapy with high degrees of uncertainty.
为了确定与具有“安全型”心理依恋取向的替代决策者相比,具有“不安全型”心理依恋取向的重症监护病房(ICU)替代决策者是否更倾向于为预后不良的严重急性脑损伤患者请求气管切开术和胃造口术(即维持生命的治疗)。
2017年11月至2018年8月的横断面调查。
一所学术医疗中心的单一神经科学重症监护病房。
入住ICU且住院时间至少24小时的患者的替代决策者连续样本。
无。
我们通过一种标准工具——关系问卷来确定替代决策者的心理依恋取向,并收集其他替代决策者和患者的人口统计学信息。我们还向替代决策者呈现了一名插管的预后不良的严重急性脑损伤患者的假设情景,并询问每位替代决策者他或她是否会请求维持生命的治疗或仅采取舒适措施。采用Fisher精确检验来比较安全型和不安全型替代决策者选择维持生命治疗的频率。此外,我们进行了单因素和多因素分析,以确定维持生命治疗选择的其他独立预测因素。713名符合条件的受访者中有275名(38.6%)参与;153名(55.6%)替代决策者为安全型,122名(44.4%)为不安全型。与不安全型替代决策者相比,安全型替代决策者选择维持生命治疗的比例没有显著差异(18.3%对20.5%;P = 0.38)。尽管仍然不显著,但具有特定“焦虑型”不安全亚型的替代决策者与“非焦虑型”相比,观察到的差异略大(18.2%对23.0%;P = 0.41)。总体而言,选择维持生命治疗(相对于仅采取舒适措施)的受访者中,对假设决策感到不确定或非常不确定的比例更高(45.3%对9.5%;P < 0.001)。在多因素模型中,非白人种族和高宗教信仰是维持生命治疗选择的显著预测因素。
虽然替代决策者的依恋取向不能预测维持生命治疗的选择,但非白人种族和高宗教信仰可以。未来旨在支持严重急性脑损伤替代决策者的干预措施可以侧重于那些倾向于在高度不确定的情况下选择维持生命治疗的替代决策者。