Suppr超能文献

MRI 对合并急性乳突炎的检测与 CT 的比较。

Detection of Coalescent Acute Mastoiditis on MRI in Comparison with CT.

机构信息

HUS Medical Imaging Center, Radiology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, POB 340 Haartmaninkatu 4, HUS 00029, Helsinki, Finland.

Radiology, East Tallinn Central Hospital, Ravi tn. 18, 10138, Tallinn, Estonia.

出版信息

Clin Neuroradiol. 2021 Sep;31(3):589-597. doi: 10.1007/s00062-020-00931-0. Epub 2020 Jul 21.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Current imaging standard for acute mastoiditis (AM) is contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), revealing inflammation-induced bone destruction, whereas magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outperforms CT in detecting intracranial infection. Our aim was to compare the diagnostic performance of MRI with CT in detecting coalescent AM and see to which extent MRI alone would suffice to diagnose or rule out this condition.

METHODS

The MR images of 32 patients with AM were retrospectively analyzed. Bone destruction was evaluated from T2 turbo spin echo (TSE) and T1 Gd magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition with gradient echo (MPRAGE) images. Intramastoid enhancement and diffusion restriction were evaluated subjectively and intramastoid apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were measured. The MRI findings were compared with contrast-enhanced CT findings of the same patients within 48 h of the MR scan.

RESULTS

Depending on the anatomical subsite, MRI detected definite bone defects with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 54-82%. Exception was the inner cortical table where sensitivity was only 14% and specificity was 76%. Sensitivity for general coalescent mastoiditis remained 100% due to multiple coexisting lesions. The absence of intense enhancement and non-restricted diffusion had a high negative predictive value for coalescent mastoiditis: an intramastoid ADC above 1.2 × 10 mm/s excluded coalescent mastoiditis with a negative predictive value of 92%.

CONCLUSION

The MRI did not miss coalescent mastoiditis but was inferior to CT in direct estimation of bone defects. When enhancement and diffusion characteristics are also considered, MRI enables dividing patients into low, intermediate and high-risk categories with respect to coalescent mastoiditis, where only the intermediate risk group is likely to benefit from additional CT.

摘要

目的

目前急性乳突炎(AM)的影像学标准是对比增强 CT(CT),可显示炎症引起的骨破坏,而磁共振成像(MRI)在检测颅内感染方面优于 CT。我们的目的是比较 MRI 和 CT 检测融合性 AM 的诊断性能,并确定 MRI 单独检查在多大程度上足以诊断或排除这种情况。

方法

回顾性分析 32 例 AM 患者的 MRI 图像。从 T2 涡轮自旋回波(TSE)和 T1 Gd 磁化准备快速获取梯度回波(MPRAGE)图像评估骨破坏。主观评估乳突内增强和弥散受限,并测量乳突内表观弥散系数(ADC)值。将 MRI 结果与同一患者在 MRI 扫描后 48 小时内的对比增强 CT 结果进行比较。

结果

根据解剖亚部位,MRI 检测到明确的骨缺损,灵敏度为 100%,特异性为 54%-82%。内皮质板的灵敏度仅为 14%,特异性为 76%,为异常。由于存在多个共存病变,因此弥漫性乳突炎的整体灵敏度仍为 100%。无强烈增强和弥散受限对融合性乳突炎具有较高的阴性预测值:乳突内 ADC 高于 1.2×10mm/s 可排除融合性乳突炎,阴性预测值为 92%。

结论

MRI 没有漏诊融合性乳突炎,但在直接估计骨缺损方面逊于 CT。当考虑增强和弥散特征时,MRI 可以将患者分为低危、中危和高危融合性乳突炎组,仅中危组可能受益于额外的 CT 检查。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c949/8463380/40bd37866d8a/62_2020_931_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验