• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复发环境下多发性骨髓瘤患者新型风险分层算法的方法学

Methodology of a Novel Risk Stratification Algorithm for Patients with Multiple Myeloma in the Relapsed Setting.

作者信息

Bouwmeester Walter, Briggs Andrew, van Hout Ben, Hájek Roman, Gonzalez-McQuire Sebastian, Campioni Marco, DeCosta Lucy, Brozova Lucie

机构信息

Pharmerit International, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Oncol Ther. 2019 Dec;7(2):141-157. doi: 10.1007/s40487-019-00100-5. Epub 2019 Nov 3.

DOI:10.1007/s40487-019-00100-5
PMID:32699987
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7359995/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Risk stratification tools provide valuable information to inform treatment decisions. Existing algorithms for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) were based on patients with newly diagnosed disease, and these have not been validated in the relapsed setting or in routine clinical practice. We developed a risk stratification algorithm (RSA) for patients with MM at initiation of second-line (2L) treatment, based on data from the Czech Registry of Monoclonal Gammopathies.

METHODS

Predictors of overall survival (OS) at 2L treatment were identified using Cox proportional hazards models and backward selection. Risk scores were obtained by multiplying the hazard ratios for each predictor. The K-adaptive partitioning for survival (KAPS) algorithm defined four groups of stratification based on individual risk scores.

RESULTS

Performance of the RSA was assessed using Nagelkerke's R test and Harrell's concordance index through Kaplan-Meier analysis of OS data. Prognostic groups were successfully defined based on real-world data. Use of a multiplicative score based on Cox modeling and KAPS to define cut-off values was effective.

CONCLUSION

Through innovative methods of risk assessment and collaboration between physicians and statisticians, the RSA was capable of stratifying patients at 2L treatment by survival expectations. This approach can be used to develop clinical decision-making tools in other disease areas to improve patient management.

FUNDING

Amgen Europe GmbH.

摘要

引言

风险分层工具为治疗决策提供了有价值的信息。现有的多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者算法是基于新诊断疾病的患者,这些算法尚未在复发情况下或常规临床实践中得到验证。我们基于捷克单克隆丙种球蛋白病登记处的数据,为二线(2L)治疗开始时的MM患者开发了一种风险分层算法(RSA)。

方法

使用Cox比例风险模型和向后选择法确定2L治疗时总生存期(OS)的预测因素。通过将每个预测因素的风险比相乘获得风险评分。生存K自适应划分(KAPS)算法根据个体风险评分定义了四组分层。

结果

通过对OS数据进行Kaplan-Meier分析,使用Nagelkerke's R检验和Harrell一致性指数评估RSA的性能。基于真实世界数据成功定义了预后组。使用基于Cox建模和KAPS的乘法评分来定义临界值是有效的。

结论

通过创新的风险评估方法以及医生与统计学家之间的合作,RSA能够根据生存预期对2L治疗的患者进行分层。这种方法可用于在其他疾病领域开发临床决策工具,以改善患者管理。

资助

安进欧洲有限公司。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/007c/7359995/456aad6c114f/40487_2019_100_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/007c/7359995/31e7dce5da04/40487_2019_100_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/007c/7359995/1786a807cbca/40487_2019_100_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/007c/7359995/456aad6c114f/40487_2019_100_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/007c/7359995/31e7dce5da04/40487_2019_100_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/007c/7359995/1786a807cbca/40487_2019_100_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/007c/7359995/456aad6c114f/40487_2019_100_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Methodology of a Novel Risk Stratification Algorithm for Patients with Multiple Myeloma in the Relapsed Setting.复发环境下多发性骨髓瘤患者新型风险分层算法的方法学
Oncol Ther. 2019 Dec;7(2):141-157. doi: 10.1007/s40487-019-00100-5. Epub 2019 Nov 3.
2
Development and validation of a novel risk stratification algorithm for relapsed multiple myeloma.新型复发性多发性骨髓瘤风险分层算法的建立与验证。
Br J Haematol. 2019 Nov;187(4):447-458. doi: 10.1111/bjh.16105. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
3
Novel risk stratification algorithm for estimating the risk of death in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma: external validation in a retrospective chart review.用于评估复发多发性骨髓瘤患者死亡风险的新型风险分层算法:回顾性病历审查中的外部验证
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 14;10(7):e034209. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034209.
4
Validation of multiple myeloma risk stratification indices in routine clinical practice: Analysis of data from the Czech Myeloma Group Registry of Monoclonal Gammopathies.多发性骨髓瘤风险分层指数在常规临床实践中的验证:捷克骨髓瘤小组单克隆丙种球蛋白血症登记处数据分析。
Cancer Med. 2018 Aug;7(8):4132-4145. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1620. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
5
Does Ethnicity Matter in Multiple Myeloma Risk Prediction in the Era of Genomics and Novel Agents? Evidence From Real-World Data.在基因组学和新型药物时代,种族因素在多发性骨髓瘤风险预测中重要吗?来自真实世界数据的证据。
Front Oncol. 2021 Nov 9;11:720932. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.720932. eCollection 2021.
6
Development of a prognostic model for overall survival in multiple myeloma using the Connect MM Patient Registry.利用 Connect MM 患者注册中心开发多发性骨髓瘤总生存预后模型。
Br J Haematol. 2019 Dec;187(5):602-614. doi: 10.1111/bjh.16139. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
7
GCRS: A hybrid graph convolutional network for risk stratification in multiple myeloma cancer patients.GCRS:一种用于多发性骨髓瘤患者风险分层的混合图卷积网络。
Comput Biol Med. 2022 Oct;149:106048. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106048. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
8
Validation of Modified Breast Graded Prognostic Assessment for breast cancer patients with brain metastases: extra-cranial disease progression is an independent risk factor.改良版乳腺癌分级预后评估在脑转移乳腺癌患者中的验证:颅外疾病进展是一个独立危险因素。
Ann Palliat Med. 2019 Sep;8(4):390-400. doi: 10.21037/apm.2019.02.05. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
9
The significance of pretreatment anemia in the era of R-IPI and NCCN-IPI prognostic risk assessment tools: a dual-center study in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients.R-IPI和NCCN-IPI预后风险评估工具时代预处理贫血的意义:一项针对弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者的双中心研究
Eur J Haematol. 2015 Dec;95(6):538-44. doi: 10.1111/ejh.12529. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
10
Improving Clinical Risk Stratification at Diagnosis in Primary Prostate Cancer: A Prognostic Modelling Study.改善原发性前列腺癌诊断时的临床风险分层:一项预后建模研究。
PLoS Med. 2016 Aug 2;13(8):e1002063. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002063. eCollection 2016 Aug.

引用本文的文献

1
Novel risk stratification algorithm for estimating the risk of death in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma: external validation in a retrospective chart review.用于评估复发多发性骨髓瘤患者死亡风险的新型风险分层算法:回顾性病历审查中的外部验证
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 14;10(7):e034209. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034209.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and validation of a novel risk stratification algorithm for relapsed multiple myeloma.新型复发性多发性骨髓瘤风险分层算法的建立与验证。
Br J Haematol. 2019 Nov;187(4):447-458. doi: 10.1111/bjh.16105. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
2
Development of an Initial Conceptual Model of Multiple Myeloma to Support Clinical and Health Economics Decision Making.开发多发性骨髓瘤初始概念模型以支持临床和卫生经济学决策制定。
MDM Policy Pract. 2019 Jan 17;4(1):2381468318814253. doi: 10.1177/2381468318814253. eCollection 2019 Jan-Jun.
3
Recent advances in understanding multiple myeloma.
多发性骨髓瘤认识方面的最新进展
Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther. 2017 Dec;10(4):267-271. doi: 10.1016/j.hemonc.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
4
Multiple myeloma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.多发性骨髓瘤:ESMO诊断、治疗及随访临床实践指南
Ann Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;28(suppl_4):iv52-iv61. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx096.
5
Multiple myeloma: patient outcomes in real-world practice.多发性骨髓瘤:真实世界实践中的患者结局
Br J Haematol. 2016 Oct;175(2):252-264. doi: 10.1111/bjh.14213. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
6
External validation of clinical prediction models using big datasets from e-health records or IPD meta-analysis: opportunities and challenges.利用电子健康记录或个体患者数据(IPD)荟萃分析的大数据集对临床预测模型进行外部验证:机遇与挑战
BMJ. 2016 Jun 22;353:i3140. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3140.
7
Multiple myeloma: practice patterns across Europe.多发性骨髓瘤:欧洲各地的诊疗模式
Br J Haematol. 2016 Oct;175(1):66-76. doi: 10.1111/bjh.14193. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
8
Quantifying the impact of different approaches for handling continuous predictors on the performance of a prognostic model.量化处理连续预测变量的不同方法对预后模型性能的影响。
Stat Med. 2016 Oct 15;35(23):4124-35. doi: 10.1002/sim.6986. Epub 2016 May 18.
9
How to develop a more accurate risk prediction model when there are few events.当事件数量较少时,如何开发一个更准确的风险预测模型。
BMJ. 2015 Aug 11;351:h3868. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h3868.
10
Revised International Staging System for Multiple Myeloma: A Report From International Myeloma Working Group.多发性骨髓瘤修订国际分期系统:国际骨髓瘤工作组报告
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Sep 10;33(26):2863-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.2267. Epub 2015 Aug 3.