Department of Hospital Medicine, University of Queensland and Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Portola Pharmaceuticals, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Adv Ther. 2020 Sep;37(9):3942-3953. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01440-9. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are associated with risk of major bleeding. This study evaluated the incremental healthcare economic burden of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) treated with DOACs and hospitalized with a major bleed (MB).
Adult patients with AF treated with DOACs and hospitalized with MB or no MB hospitalizations during January 1, 2015-April 30, 2018 were extracted from MarketScan claims databases. The index date was defined as the first MB hospitalization for patients with MB and a random date during DOAC usage for patients without MB. Healthcare resource utilization and costs were evaluated for index hospitalizations of patients with MB and during the 6-month period prior to index dates and a variable follow-up period of 1-12 months for both patients with and those without MB. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to evaluate the incremental burden of MB vs. non-MB status on all-cause hospital days and healthcare costs.
Of the overall AF patient population using DOACs (N = 152,305), 7577 (5.0%) had a hospitalization for MB. Greater proportions of those who had an MB hospitalization were older and female compared to patients without MB (mean age 76.1 vs. 70.1 years; 44.1% vs. 40.5% female, respectively). For index MB hospitalizations, mean length of stay (LOS) was 5.3 days and cost was $32,938. In adjusted analyses, patients with MB had 3.6 more hospital days, $10,609 higher inpatient cost, $9613 higher outpatient medical cost, and $18,910 higher total healthcare costs for all causes per patient during follow-up (all p < 0.001). Including index MB hospitalization costs in the follow-up, all-cause total adjusted healthcare costs were almost two times higher for patients with vs. without MB ($96,590 vs. $49,091, p < 0.001).
Among a large US nationally representative sample of patients with AF treated with DOACs, the cost of MB hospitalization was substantial. Furthermore, healthcare costs following MB events were nearly 40% higher compared to those of patients with AF without an MB.
直接作用的口服抗凝剂(DOACs)与大出血的风险相关。本研究评估了使用 DOAC 治疗心房颤动(AF)并因主要出血(MB)住院的患者的增量医疗保健经济负担。
从 MarketScan 索赔数据库中提取了 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 4 月 30 日期间接受 DOAC 治疗且因 MB 住院或无 MB 住院的成年 AF 患者。索引日期定义为因 MB 住院的患者的第一次 MB 住院日期和无 MB 住院的患者在 DOAC 使用期间的随机日期。对因 MB 住院的患者的索引住院和在索引日期前 6 个月以及因 MB 和无 MB 的患者的 1-12 个月的可变随访期间评估了医疗资源的使用和费用。使用多变量回归分析评估了 MB 与非 MB 状态对所有原因住院天数和医疗保健费用的增量负担。
在使用 DOAC 的总体 AF 患者人群中(N=152,305),有 7577 人(5.0%)因 MB 住院。与无 MB 患者相比,MB 住院患者的年龄较大且女性比例较高(平均年龄 76.1 岁对 70.1 岁;分别为 44.1%对 40.5%的女性)。对于 MB 索引住院,平均住院时间(LOS)为 5.3 天,费用为 32,938 美元。在调整后的分析中,MB 患者的住院天数增加了 3.6 天,住院费用增加了 10,609 美元,门诊医疗费用增加了 9613 美元,所有原因的总医疗保健费用增加了 18,910 美元(所有 p<0.001)。包括 MB 索引住院费用在内,MB 患者的所有原因总调整后的医疗保健费用几乎是无 MB 患者的两倍(96,590 美元对 49,091 美元,p<0.001)。
在接受 DOAC 治疗的 AF 患者的大型美国全国代表性样本中,MB 住院的费用相当高。此外,与无 MB 的 AF 患者相比,MB 事件后的医疗保健成本增加了近 40%。