Institute of Neuroscience, Shanghai Institute for Biological Sciences, Shanghai, China.
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
J Cogn Psychother. 2020 Jan 1;34(1):58-69. doi: 10.1891/0889-8391.34.1.58.
Although the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) is one of the most extensively used and tested disability measurements, there has only been one psychometric evaluation of its properties in a Chinese-speaking population. Here, we provide a comprehensive psychometric assessment of the scale in 465 Mandarin-speakers who were accessing information online regarding psychotherapy. Principal component analysis and subsequent confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the SDS is one-dimensional (normed fit index = 0.976, non-normed fit index = 0.97, comparative fit index = 0.98, goodness-of-fit index = 0.967, standardized root mean-square residual = 0.023, root mean-square error of approximation = 0.149). The SDS exhibited excellent internal consistency (α = .89) and moderate test-retest reliability when readministered approximately 8 days later (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.55). Convergent validity was demonstrated by strong relationships with other measures of functional impairment (FI), while divergent validity was evidenced by fair correlation with a treatment ambivalence measure. Known-groups validity analyses showed that high FI was associated with significantly higher clinical scores of anxiety, depression, and obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Regression analysis indicated that the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 score accounted for 37.6% of variance in FI. Overall, these findings support the reliability and validity of the SDS when used in Chinese treatment-seeking individuals, as well its usefulness as an online screening tool of FI.
尽管 Sheehan 残疾量表(SDS)是使用最广泛和测试最多的残疾测量之一,但在华语人群中,只有一项对其特性的心理计量学评估。在这里,我们对 465 名正在网上获取心理治疗信息的普通话使用者进行了全面的心理计量学评估。主成分分析和随后的验证性因素分析表明,SDS 是单维的(标准化拟合指数=0.976,非标准化拟合指数=0.97,比较拟合指数=0.98,拟合优度指数=0.967,标准化均方根残差=0.023,近似均方根误差=0.149)。SDS 表现出良好的内部一致性(α=0.89),大约 8 天后重新测试时具有中等的重测信度(组内相关系数=0.55)。与其他功能障碍测量方法的强烈关系表明了收敛效度,而与治疗矛盾性测量方法的适度相关性则证明了发散效度。已知组有效性分析表明,高功能障碍与焦虑、抑郁和强迫症症状的临床评分显著升高有关。回归分析表明,抑郁焦虑压力量表-21 评分解释了 FI 方差的 37.6%。总的来说,这些发现支持 SDS 在寻求中国治疗的个体中使用的可靠性和有效性,以及作为 FI 在线筛查工具的有用性。