• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用希恩残疾量表评估初级保健中的精神障碍。

Assessing psychiatric impairment in primary care with the Sheehan Disability Scale.

作者信息

Leon A C, Olfson M, Portera L, Farber L, Sheehan D V

机构信息

Cornell University Medical College, Department of Psychiatry, New York, NY 10021, USA.

出版信息

Int J Psychiatry Med. 1997;27(2):93-105. doi: 10.2190/T8EM-C8YH-373N-1UWD.

DOI:10.2190/T8EM-C8YH-373N-1UWD
PMID:9565717
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Several recent studies have documented that substantial functional impairment is associated with many of the mental disorders seen in primary care. However, brief measures of mental health-related functional impairment are not commonly applied in primary care settings. The Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), a three-item instrument for assessing such impairment, is evaluated in this study.

METHOD

A psychometric analysis of the SDS was conducted with a sample of 1001 primary care patients at Kaiser Permanente In Oakland, California. The SDS and the Symptom Driven Diagnostic System for Primary Care assessments were completed.

RESULTS

The internal consistency reliability of the SDS is high, with coefficient alpha of 0.89. The construct validity was substantiated in two ways. A one-factor model fit the data quite well. Furthermore, patients with each of six psychiatric disorders had significantly higher impairment scores than those who did not. Finally, over 80 percent of the patients with mental disorder diagnoses had an elevated SDS score and nearly 50 percent of those with elevated SDS scores had at least one disorder.

CONCLUSIONS

The psychometric properties of the SDS were evaluated in primary care. The internal consistency reliability was high. The analyses also lend empirical support for the construct validity. The scale is a sensitive tool for identifying primary care patients with mental health-related functional impairment, who would warrant a diagnostically-oriented mental health assessment.

摘要

目的

近期的多项研究表明,在初级保健中常见的许多精神障碍都伴有严重的功能损害。然而,与心理健康相关的功能损害的简短测量方法在初级保健环境中并不常用。本研究对用于评估此类损害的三项式希恩残疾量表(SDS)进行了评估。

方法

对加利福尼亚州奥克兰凯撒医疗集团的1001名初级保健患者样本进行了SDS的心理测量分析。完成了SDS和初级保健症状驱动诊断系统评估。

结果

SDS的内部一致性信度较高,α系数为0.89。结构效度通过两种方式得到证实。单因素模型与数据拟合良好。此外,六种精神障碍患者的损害得分均显著高于无精神障碍者。最后,超过80%的精神障碍诊断患者SDS得分升高,近50%的SDS得分升高者至少患有一种疾病。

结论

在初级保健中对SDS的心理测量特性进行了评估。内部一致性信度较高。分析也为结构效度提供了实证支持。该量表是识别有心理健康相关功能损害的初级保健患者的敏感工具,这些患者需要进行以诊断为导向的心理健康评估。

相似文献

1
Assessing psychiatric impairment in primary care with the Sheehan Disability Scale.使用希恩残疾量表评估初级保健中的精神障碍。
Int J Psychiatry Med. 1997;27(2):93-105. doi: 10.2190/T8EM-C8YH-373N-1UWD.
2
An Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of the Sheehan Disability Scale in a Chinese Psychotherapy-Seeking Sample.《在中国寻求心理治疗的样本中评估希恩残疾量表的心理测量特性》。
J Cogn Psychother. 2020 Jan 1;34(1):58-69. doi: 10.1891/0889-8391.34.1.58.
3
The Psychiatric Assessment Schedule for Adult with Developmental Disability (PAS-ADD) Checklist: reliability and validity of French version.成人发育障碍患者精神科评估量表(PAS - ADD)检查表:法语版的信度和效度
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2013 Aug;57(8):758-65. doi: 10.1111/jir.12028. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
4
The psychometric validation of the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) in patients with bipolar disorder.双相情感障碍患者中Sheehan残疾量表(SDS)的心理测量学验证
Psychiatry Res. 2009 Jan 30;165(1-2):163-74. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2007.11.018. Epub 2008 Nov 29.
5
PRIME-MD: its utility in detecting mental disorders in American Indians.PRIME-MD:其在美国印第安人精神障碍检测中的效用。
Int J Psychiatry Med. 1997;27(2):107-28. doi: 10.2190/C6FD-7QWB-KNGR-M844.
6
Subthreshold psychiatric symptoms in a primary care group practice.基层医疗团体诊所中的阈下精神症状
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1996 Oct;53(10):880-6. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830100026004.
7
Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS-C).希恩残疾量表中文版(SDS-C)的效度和信度。
Asia Pac Psychiatry. 2015 Jun;7(2):215-22. doi: 10.1111/appy.12182. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
8
Psychometric evaluation of a Dutch version of the Mini PAS-ADD for assessing psychiatric disorders in adults with different levels of intellectual disability.荷兰版Mini PAS-ADD用于评估不同智力残疾水平成人精神疾病的心理测量学评价。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2013 Aug;57(8):689-702. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01544.x. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
9
Diagnostic errors of primary care screens for depression and panic disorder.
Int J Psychiatry Med. 1999;29(1):1-11. doi: 10.2190/7AMF-D1JL-8VHA-APGJ.
10
The Brown Assessment of Beliefs Scale: reliability and validity.布朗信念评估量表:信度与效度
Am J Psychiatry. 1998 Jan;155(1):102-8. doi: 10.1176/ajp.155.1.102.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond symptom improvement: transdiagnostic and disorder-specific ways to assess functional and quality of life outcomes across mental disorders in adults.超越症状改善:评估成人精神障碍患者功能和生活质量结果的跨诊断及特定障碍方法。
World Psychiatry. 2025 Oct;24(3):296-318. doi: 10.1002/wps.21338.
2
The Transdiagnostic Intervention for Sleep and Circadian Dysfunction (TSC) in Community Mental Health: Evaluating Self-Reported Psychiatric Disorders as a Predictor of Symptoms and Treatment Outcome.社区心理健康中睡眠与昼夜节律功能障碍的跨诊断干预(TSC):评估自我报告的精神障碍作为症状和治疗结果的预测指标。
Res Sq. 2025 Aug 6:rs.3.rs-7189279. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7189279/v1.
3
Protocol to develop and pilot a primary mental healthcare intervention model to address the medium- to long-term Ebola associated psychological distress and psychosocial problems in Mubende District in Central Uganda (the Ebola+D project).
制定并试行一项初级精神卫生保健干预模型的方案,以应对乌干达中部穆本德区埃博拉疫情中长期相关的心理困扰和社会心理问题(埃博拉+D项目)。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 6;20(8):e0329591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329591. eCollection 2025.
4
Introducing the Glutamate-Amplifies-Noradrenergic-Effects (GANE) Model to the Neurocognitive Study of Emotion-Related Impulsivity.将谷氨酸放大去甲肾上腺素能效应(GANE)模型引入情绪相关冲动性的神经认知研究。
Clin Psychol Sci. 2025 Jul;13(4):810-834. doi: 10.1177/21677026241305377. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
5
Driven by rewards or punishments? Understanding real world social functioning in anxiety and depressive disorders.受奖惩驱动?理解焦虑和抑郁障碍中的现实世界社交功能。
J Mood Anxiety Disord. 2024 Dec 7;9:100097. doi: 10.1016/j.xjmad.2024.100097. eCollection 2025 Mar.
6
Collaborative Care Versus Consultation Liaison for Patients With Depression or Anxiety Disorders in General Practice in Denmark: 18-Month Follow-Up From the Collabri Flex Trials.丹麦全科医疗中抑郁症或焦虑症患者的协作护理与会诊联络:Collabri Flex试验的18个月随访
Depress Anxiety. 2025 Jun 5;2025:2909617. doi: 10.1155/da/2909617. eCollection 2025.
7
Safety and efficacy with esketamine in treatment-resistant depression: long-term extension study.艾氯胺酮治疗难治性抑郁症的安全性和有效性:长期扩展研究。
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2025 Jun 6;28(6). doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyaf027.
8
Clinical Significance of Psychiatric Comorbidities Among Outpatients With Gambling Disorder in Japan: A 12-Month Follow-Up Study.日本赌博障碍门诊患者精神共病的临床意义:一项为期12个月的随访研究。
Neuropsychopharmacol Rep. 2025 Jun;45(2):e70016. doi: 10.1002/npr2.70016.
9
What do clients think about amplifying positivity? Client change perspectives following a cognitive and behavioural positive activity intervention for anxiety and depression.客户对增强积极情绪有何看法?在针对焦虑和抑郁的认知与行为积极活动干预后客户的改变观点。
Couns Psychother Res. 2025 Mar;25(1). doi: 10.1002/capr.12822. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
10
Associations between treatment credibility, patient expectancies, working alliance and symptom trajectory in cognitive behaviour therapy for pathological health anxiety.病理性健康焦虑认知行为疗法中治疗可信度、患者期望、工作联盟与症状轨迹之间的关联
Psychol Psychother. 2025 Sep;98(3):779-798. doi: 10.1111/papt.12591. Epub 2025 Mar 27.