Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam.
Department of Urology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden.
Curr Opin Urol. 2020 Sep;30(5):654-664. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000798.
In this narrative review, we assessed the role of F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography/CT (FDG-PET/CT) in preoperative staging and response evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma (MIBC), and to assess its incremental value to contrast-enhanced (CE)CT and MRI in terms of patient management at initial diagnosis and detection of recurrence.
A literature search in PubMed yielded 46 original reports, of which 15 compared FDG-PET/CT with CECT and one with MRI. For primary tumor assessment, FDG-PET/CT proved not accurate enough (13 reports; n = 7-70). For lymph node assessment, sensitivity of FDG-PET/CT is superior to CT with comparable specificity in 19 studies (n = 15-233). For detection of distant metastases, data from eight studies (n = 43-79) suggests that FDG-PET/CT is accurate, although comparative studies are lacking. Limited evidence (four studies, n = 19-50) suggests that FDG-PET/CT is not accurate for response evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. FDG-PET/CT incited change(s) in patient management in 18-68% of patients (five reports; n = 57-103). For detection of recurrence, seven studies (n = 29-287) indicated that FDG-PET/CT is accurate.
Most studies evaluated FDG-PET/CT for lymph node assessment and reported higher sensitivity than CT, with comparable specificity. FDG-PET/CT showed incremental value to CECT for recurrence and often incited change(s) in patient management.
在本叙述性综述中,我们评估了 F-氟代-2-脱氧-D-葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(FDG-PET/CT)在肌层浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)新辅助化疗的术前分期和反应评估中的作用,并评估其在初始诊断和检测复发时对增强 CT(CECT)和 MRI 的患者管理的附加价值。
在 PubMed 中进行文献检索,得到 46 篇原始报告,其中 15 篇报告比较了 FDG-PET/CT 与 CECT,1 篇报告与 MRI 比较。对于原发肿瘤评估,FDG-PET/CT 的准确性不够(13 篇报告;n=7-70)。对于淋巴结评估,19 项研究(n=15-233)表明 FDG-PET/CT 的敏感性优于 CT,特异性相当。对于远处转移的检测,8 项研究(n=43-79)的数据表明 FDG-PET/CT 的准确性较高,但缺乏比较性研究。有限的证据(4 项研究,n=19-50)表明 FDG-PET/CT 对新辅助化疗的反应评估不准确。FDG-PET/CT 促使患者管理发生改变的比例为 18-68%(5 篇报告;n=57-103)。对于复发的检测,7 项研究(n=29-287)表明 FDG-PET/CT 的准确性较高。
大多数研究评估了 FDG-PET/CT 用于淋巴结评估,并报告了比 CT 更高的敏感性,特异性相当。FDG-PET/CT 对 CECT 具有附加价值,可用于检测复发,并经常促使患者管理发生改变。