• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

来氟米特单药治疗与传统合成改善病情抗风湿药物联合治疗类风湿关节炎的回顾性研究。

Leflunomide monotherapy versus combination therapy with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective study.

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, Mianyang Central Hospital, Mianyang, Sichuan, China.

Department of Clinical Research Center, Dazhou Central Hospital, No. 56 Nanyuemiao Street, Tongchuan District, Dazhou, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 23;10(1):12339. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69309-z.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-69309-z
PMID:32704073
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7378063/
Abstract

Leflunomide (LEF) is a conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. However, there are few reports on the comparison of efficacy between LEF alone and combined with other csDMARDs. Here, the efficacy and safety of LEF monotherapy (88) and combination (361) therapy groups were evaluated. After 3 months, there were no significant differences in 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28), health assessment questionnaire (HAQ), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) between the monotherapy and combination groups (all P > 0.05). According to the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria, it was found that the DAS28 response rates were similar in the two groups (P > 0.05). Besides, the two groups presented similar safety profiles. Subgroup analysis found that there was no difference in efficacy among the three combined therapies (LEF + methotrexate (MTX), LEF + hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), and LEF + MTX + HCQ) and LEF monotherapy. Furthermore, when the dose of LEF was less than 40 mg/day, no significant difference in efficacy was observed between low and high doses. Overall, these results indicated that low dose LEF monotherapy was not inferior to the combination therapy.

摘要

来氟米特(LEF)是一种传统的合成疾病修饰抗风湿药物(csDMARDs),用于治疗类风湿关节炎。然而,关于 LEF 单独治疗与联合其他 csDMARDs 治疗疗效的比较报告较少。在这里,评估了 LEF 单药(88 例)和联合(361 例)治疗组的疗效和安全性。治疗 3 个月后,两组 28 关节疾病活动评分(DAS28)、健康评估问卷(HAQ)、红细胞沉降率(ESR)和 C 反应蛋白(CRP)均无显著差异(均 P>0.05)。根据欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)反应标准,发现两组 DAS28 反应率相似(P>0.05)。此外,两组具有相似的安全性特征。亚组分析发现,三种联合治疗(LEF+甲氨蝶呤(MTX)、LEF+羟氯喹(HCQ)和 LEF+MTX+HCQ)与 LEF 单药治疗之间疗效无差异。此外,当 LEF 剂量小于 40mg/天时,低剂量和高剂量之间的疗效无显著差异。总体而言,这些结果表明,低剂量 LEF 单药治疗并不劣于联合治疗。

相似文献

1
Leflunomide monotherapy versus combination therapy with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective study.来氟米特单药治疗与传统合成改善病情抗风湿药物联合治疗类风湿关节炎的回顾性研究。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 23;10(1):12339. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69309-z.
2
Retention of triple therapy with methotrexate, sulfasalazine, and hydroxychloroquine compared to combination methotrexate and leflunomide in rheumatoid arthritis.与甲氨蝶呤和来氟米特联合治疗相比,类风湿关节炎患者中保留三联疗法(甲氨蝶呤、柳氮磺胺吡啶和羟氯喹)。
Joint Bone Spine. 2024 Jul;91(4):105732. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2024.105732. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
3
Preliminary evaluation in rheumatoid arthritis activity in patients treated with TNF-alpha blocker plus methotrexate versus methotrexate or leflunomide alone.对接受肿瘤坏死因子-α阻滞剂联合甲氨蝶呤治疗的类风湿性关节炎患者与仅接受甲氨蝶呤或来氟米特治疗的患者的类风湿性关节炎活动度进行初步评估。
Rheumatol Int. 2007 May;27(7):641-7. doi: 10.1007/s00296-006-0272-7. Epub 2007 Jan 18.
4
Comparing methotrexate monotherapy with methotrexate plus leflunomide combination therapy in psoriatic arthritis: protocol of a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial (COMPLETE-PsA).比较甲氨蝶呤单药治疗与甲氨蝶呤联合来氟米特治疗银屑病关节炎:一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲临床试验方案(COMPLETE-PsA)。
Trials. 2020 Feb 10;21(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4097-6.
5
Long-term efficacy of leflunomide on disease activity and inhibition of joint damage: retrospective comparison with methotrexate for Japanese rheumatoid arthritis patients.来氟米特对疾病活动和抑制关节损伤的长期疗效:与甲氨蝶呤治疗日本类风湿关节炎患者的回顾性比较。
Mod Rheumatol. 2009;19(5):513-21. doi: 10.1007/s10165-009-0201-1. Epub 2009 Jul 15.
6
The SMILE study -- safety of methotrexate in combination with leflunomide in rheumatoid arthritis.SMILE 研究——甲氨蝶呤联合来氟米特治疗类风湿关节炎的安全性。
J Rheumatol. 2013 Mar;40(3):228-35. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.120922. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
7
Two-year, blinded, randomized, controlled trial of treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis with leflunomide compared with methotrexate. Utilization of Leflunomide in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis Trial Investigator Group.来氟米特与甲氨蝶呤治疗活动性类风湿关节炎的两年双盲随机对照试验。类风湿关节炎治疗中来氟米特应用试验研究组。
Arthritis Rheum. 2001 Sep;44(9):1984-92. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200109)44:9<1984::AID-ART346>3.0.CO;2-B.
8
Efficacy and safety of add-on tacrolimus versus leflunomide in rheumatoid arthritis patients with inadequate response to methotrexate.甲氨蝶呤治疗应答不足的类风湿关节炎患者中,增效治疗时他克莫司与来氟米特的疗效和安全性。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2019 Jun;22(6):1115-1122. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13521. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
9
Efficacy and safety of methotrexate plus hydroxychloroquine combination therapy vs. methotrexate monotherapy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: A randomized controlled clinical trial.甲氨蝶呤联合羟氯喹与甲氨蝶呤单药治疗类风湿关节炎的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照临床试验。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2024 Sep;27(9):e15319. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.15319.
10
Abatacept used in combination with non-methotrexate disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a descriptive analysis of data from interventional trials and the real-world setting.阿巴西普联合非甲氨蝶呤类疾病修正抗风湿药物治疗:来自干预性试验和真实世界研究的数据描述性分析。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2018 Jan 2;20(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13075-017-1488-5.

引用本文的文献

1
A longitudinal cohort study uncovers plasma protein biomarkers predating clinical onset and treatment response of rheumatoid arthritis.一项纵向队列研究发现了早于类风湿性关节炎临床发病和治疗反应的血浆蛋白生物标志物。
Nat Commun. 2025 Jul 21;16(1):6692. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-62032-1.
2
Evaluating leflunomide and methotrexate combination vs. monotherapy in rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis.评估来氟米特与甲氨蝶呤联合用药对比单药治疗类风湿性关节炎和银屑病关节炎的疗效。
Turk J Med Sci. 2025 Mar 24;55(3):632-643. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.6010. eCollection 2025.
3
Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) Syndrome with Multiple Drugs (Leflunomide and Cefuroxime): A Case Report.

本文引用的文献

1
EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2019 update.EULAR 推荐的类风湿关节炎治疗策略:2019 年更新版(使用合成和生物疾病修正抗风湿药物)
Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Jun;79(6):685-699. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216655. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
2
Leflunomide-induced liver injury in mice: Involvement of TLR4 mediated activation of PI3K/mTOR/NFκB pathway.来氟米特诱导的小鼠肝损伤:TLR4 介导的 PI3K/mTOR/NFκB 通路激活的参与。
Life Sci. 2019 Oct 15;235:116824. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2019.116824. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
3
Genetic and environmental risk factors for rheumatoid arthritis.
多种药物(来氟米特和头孢呋辛)引起的伴嗜酸性粒细胞增多和全身症状的药物反应(DRESS)综合征:一例报告
Curr Drug Saf. 2025;20(3):388-393. doi: 10.2174/0115748863321106240903111048.
4
2023 Management Recommendations of Bangladesh Rheumatology Society on Pharmacological Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis With Synthetic and Biologic Disease-Modifying Drugs.2023年孟加拉国风湿病学会关于使用合成和生物改善病情药物治疗类风湿关节炎的管理建议。
Cureus. 2024 Apr 30;16(4):e59395. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59395. eCollection 2024 Apr.
5
Comparative efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors and leflunomide in rheumatoid arthritis: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.比较 JAK 抑制剂和来氟米特治疗类风湿关节炎的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Dec 9;101(49):e32154. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032154.
6
Evaluating the Therapeutic Mechanisms of Selected Active Compounds in Cornus Officinalis and Paeonia Lactiflora in Rheumatoid Arthritis via Network Pharmacology Analysis.通过网络药理学分析评估山茱萸和芍药中选定活性成分在类风湿性关节炎中的治疗机制
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Apr 21;12:648037. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.648037. eCollection 2021.
类风湿关节炎的遗传和环境风险因素。
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2017 Feb;31(1):3-18. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
4
Methotrexate in combination with other DMARDs is not superior to methotrexate alone for remission induction with moderate-to-high-dose glucocorticoid bridging in early rheumatoid arthritis after 16 weeks of treatment: the CareRA trial.在 16 周的治疗后,甲氨蝶呤联合其他 DMARD 与甲氨蝶呤单药治疗在中高剂量糖皮质激素桥接早期类风湿关节炎缓解诱导方面并无优势:CareRA 试验。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Jan;74(1):27-34. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205489. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
5
Randomised comparison of initial triple DMARD therapy with methotrexate monotherapy in combination with low-dose glucocorticoid bridging therapy; 1-year data of the tREACH trial.随机比较初始三联 DMARD 治疗与甲氨蝶呤单药治疗联合小剂量糖皮质激素桥接治疗;tREACH 试验的 1 年数据。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jul;73(7):1331-9. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204788. Epub 2014 May 1.
6
The incidence of rheumatoid arthritis in the UK: comparisons using the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria and the 1987 ACR classification criteria. Results from the Norfolk Arthritis Register.英国类风湿关节炎的发病率:使用 2010 年 ACR/EULAR 分类标准和 1987 年 ACR 分类标准的比较。诺福克关节炎登记处的结果。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Aug;72(8):1315-20. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201960. Epub 2012 Sep 3.
7
Effectiveness of disease-modifying antirheumatic drug co-therapy with methotrexate and leflunomide in rituximab-treated rheumatoid arthritis patients: results of a 1-year follow-up study from the CERERRA collaboration.来氟米特联合甲氨蝶呤和柳氮磺吡啶治疗类风湿关节炎的疗效:CERERRA 合作的一项为期 1 年的随访研究结果。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Mar;71(3):374-7. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200003. Epub 2011 Oct 4.
8
Rheumatoid arthritis.类风湿关节炎。
Lancet. 2010 Sep 25;376(9746):1094-108. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60826-4.
9
Elevated liver enzyme tests among patients with rheumatoid arthritis or psoriatic arthritis treated with methotrexate and/or leflunomide.接受甲氨蝶呤和/或来氟米特治疗的类风湿关节炎或银屑病关节炎患者的肝酶试验升高。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Jan;69(1):43-7. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.101378.
10
Comparative effectiveness of tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitors in combination with either methotrexate or leflunomide.肿瘤坏死因子α抑制剂与甲氨蝶呤或来氟米特联合使用的比较疗效
Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Dec;68(12):1856-62. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.098467. Epub 2009 Jan 6.