National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Global Comparative and Translational Sciences, Integrated Biological Platform Sciences Department, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, Pennsylvania.
ILAR J. 2020 Oct 19;60(2):175-196. doi: 10.1093/ilar/ilaa012.
For more than 50 years, the research community has made strides to better determine the nutrient requirements for many common laboratory animal species. This work has resulted in high-quality animal feeds that can optimize growth, maintenance, and reproduction in most species. We have a much better understanding of the role that individual nutrients play in physiological responses. Today, diet is often considered as an independent variable in experimental design, and specialized diet formulations for experimental purposes are widely used. In contrast, drinking water provided to laboratory animals has rarely been a consideration in experimental design except in studies of specific water-borne microbial or chemical contaminants. As we advance in the precision of scientific measurements, we are constantly discovering previously unrecognized sources of experimental variability. This is the nature of science. However, science is suffering from a lack of experimental reproducibility or replicability that undermines public trust. The issue of reproducibility/replicability is especially sensitive when laboratory animals are involved since we have the ethical responsibility to assure that laboratory animals are used wisely. One way to reduce problems with reproducibility/replicability is to have a strong understanding of potential sources of inherent variability in the system under study and to provide "…a clear, specific, and complete description of how the reported results were reached [1]." A primary intent of this review is to provide the reader with a high-level overview of some basic elements of laboratory animal nutrition, methods used in the manufacturing of feeds, sources of drinking water, and general methods of water purification. The goal is to provide background on contemporary issues regarding how diet and drinking water might serve as a source of extrinsic variability that can impact animal health, study design, and experimental outcomes and provide suggestions on how to mitigate these effects.
五十多年来,研究界一直在努力更好地确定许多常见实验动物物种的营养需求。这项工作产生了高质量的动物饲料,可以优化大多数物种的生长、维持和繁殖。我们对个别营养素在生理反应中的作用有了更好的理解。如今,饮食通常被认为是实验设计中的一个自变量,并且广泛使用用于实验目的的特殊饮食配方。相比之下,除了在研究特定的水传播微生物或化学污染物的研究中外,提供给实验动物的饮用水在实验设计中很少被考虑。随着我们在科学测量的精度上不断进步,我们不断发现以前未被认识到的实验变异性来源。这就是科学的本质。然而,由于科学的可重复性或可复制性存在问题,从而损害了公众的信任。当涉及到实验动物时,可重复性/可复制性问题尤其敏感,因为我们有道德责任确保明智地使用实验动物。减少可重复性/可复制性问题的一种方法是对研究系统中固有变异性的潜在来源有一个深刻的理解,并提供“……对报告结果是如何得出的的清晰、具体和完整的描述[1]。” 本篇综述的主要目的是为读者提供实验动物营养的一些基本要素、饲料制造中使用的方法、饮用水的来源以及一般的水净化方法的高级概述。其目标是提供有关饮食和饮用水如何成为影响动物健康、研究设计和实验结果的外在变异性来源的当代问题的背景,并就如何减轻这些影响提供建议。