• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

C-SSRS 在急诊科高危自杀患者中的表现。

C-SSRS performance in emergency department patients at high risk for suicide.

机构信息

Department of Psychosocial Research, Butler Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2020 Dec;50(6):1097-1104. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12657. Epub 2020 Jul 24.

DOI:10.1111/sltb.12657
PMID:32706437
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7746629/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the psychometric and predictive performance of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) in emergency department (ED) patients with suicidal ideation or attempts (SI/SA).

METHODS

Participants (n = 1,376, mean age 36.8, 55% female, 76.8% white) completed the C-SSRS during the ED visit and were followed for one year. Reliability analyses, exploratory structural equation modeling, and prediction of future SA were explored.

RESULTS

Reliability of the Suicidal Ideation subscale was adequate, but was poor for the Intensity of Ideation and Suicidal Behavior subscales. Three empirically derived factors characterized the C-SSRS. Only Factor 1 (Suicidal Ideation and Attempts) was a reliable predictor of subsequent SA, though odds ratios were small (ORs: 1.09-1.10, CI : 1.04, 1.15). The original C-SSRS Suicidal Ideation and Suicidal Behavior subscales and the C-SSRS ED screen predicted subsequent SA, again with small odds ratios (ORs: 1.07-1.19, CI : 1.01, 1.29). In participants without a SA history, no C-SSRS subscale predicted subsequent SA. History of any SA (OR: 1.98, CI : 1.43, 2.75) was the strongest predictor of subsequent SA.

CONCLUSIONS

The psychometric evidence for the C-SSRS was mixed. History of a prior SA, as measured by the C-SSRS, provided the most parsimonious and powerful assessment for predicting future SA.

摘要

目的

评估哥伦比亚-自杀严重程度评定量表(C-SSRS)在有自杀意念或尝试(SI/SA)的急诊科(ED)患者中的心理计量学和预测性能。

方法

参与者(n=1376,平均年龄 36.8,55%为女性,76.8%为白人)在 ED 就诊期间完成了 C-SSRS,并在一年后进行了随访。探索了可靠性分析、探索性结构方程建模和对未来 SA 的预测。

结果

自杀意念子量表的可靠性是足够的,但意念强度和自杀行为子量表的可靠性较差。C-SSRS 有三个经验衍生的因素。只有因子 1(自杀意念和尝试)是未来 SA 的可靠预测因素,尽管优势比很小(ORs:1.09-1.10,CI:1.04,1.15)。原始的 C-SSRS 自杀意念和自杀行为子量表以及 C-SSRS ED 筛查预测了随后的 SA,优势比也很小(ORs:1.07-1.19,CI:1.01,1.29)。在没有 SA 病史的参与者中,没有 C-SSRS 子量表预测随后的 SA。任何 SA 病史(OR:1.98,CI:1.43,2.75)是预测随后 SA 的最强预测因素。

结论

C-SSRS 的心理计量学证据好坏参半。C-SSRS 测量的既往 SA 史提供了预测未来 SA 的最简洁和最有力的评估。

相似文献

1
C-SSRS performance in emergency department patients at high risk for suicide.C-SSRS 在急诊科高危自杀患者中的表现。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2020 Dec;50(6):1097-1104. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12657. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
2
Short term risk of non-fatal and fatal suicidal behaviours: the predictive validity of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale in a Swedish adult psychiatric population with a recent episode of self-harm.短期非致命和致命自杀行为风险:哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表在瑞典成年精神病患者近期自伤发作中的预测有效性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Oct 1;18(1):319. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1883-8.
3
The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale: initial validity and internal consistency findings from three multisite studies with adolescents and adults.哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表:三项包含青少年和成年人的多中心研究的初步有效性和内部一致性结果。
Am J Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;168(12):1266-77. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.10111704.
4
Integration of Face-to-Face Screening With Real-time Machine Learning to Predict Risk of Suicide Among Adults.将面对面筛查与实时机器学习相结合,预测成年人的自杀风险。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2212095. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.12095.
5
Predicting suicidal events: A comparison of the Concise Health Risk Tracking Self-Report (CHRT-SR) and the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS).预测自杀事件:简明健康风险追踪自我报告(CHRT-SR)与哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表(C-SSRS)的比较
Psychiatry Res. 2023 Aug;326:115306. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115306. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
6
Direct comparison of the psychometric properties of multiple interview and patient-rated assessments of suicidal ideation and behavior in an adult psychiatric inpatient sample.在成年精神科住院患者样本中,对自杀意念和行为的多种访谈和患者自评评估工具的心理测量学特性进行直接比较。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2015 Dec;76(12):1676-82. doi: 10.4088/JCP.14m09353.
7
Columbia-suicide severity rating scale: predictive validity with adolescent psychiatric emergency patients.哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表:对青少年精神科急诊患者的预测效度
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2015 Feb;31(2):88-94. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000225.
8
Is a brief self-report version of the Columbia severity scale useful for screening suicidal ideation in Chilean adolescents?哥伦比亚严重程度量表的简短自评版本是否可用于智利青少年自杀意念的筛查?
Compr Psychiatry. 2019 Jan;88:39-48. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
9
Predictive Validity of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale for Short-Term Suicidal Behavior: A Danish Study of Adolescents at a High Risk of Suicide.哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表对短期自杀行为的预测效度:丹麦一项针对高自杀风险青少年的研究。
Arch Suicide Res. 2017 Jul 3;21(3):455-469. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2016.1222318. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
10
Validation of a Spanish version of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS).哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表(C-SSRS)西班牙语版本的验证
Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment. 2016 Jul-Sep;9(3):134-42. doi: 10.1016/j.rpsm.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 May 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric characteristics of the Chinese version of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale among people with mental health diagnosis.心理健康诊断人群中哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表中文版的心理测量学特征
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 21;25(1):803. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-07187-3.
2
Analysis of Hospitals Switching From a "Danger to Self" Question to Universal Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale Screening: Impact on Screenings, Identification of Suicide Risk, and Documented Psychiatric Care.从“对自身有危险”问题转换为通用的哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表筛查的医院分析:对筛查、自杀风险识别及记录在案的精神科护理的影响
Psychiatr Res Clin Pract. 2024 Apr 3;6(2):51-60. doi: 10.1176/appi.prcp.20230068. eCollection 2024 Summer.
3
Nurses' Attitudes and Perceptions Regarding Suicidal Patients: A Quasi-Experimental Study of Depression Management Training.护士对自杀患者的态度和认知:抑郁症管理培训的一项准实验研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 23;12(3):284. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12030284.
4
Predicting suicide death after emergency department visits with mental health or self-harm diagnoses.预测在急诊科就诊并被诊断为有心理健康问题或自我伤害后出现的自杀死亡情况。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2024 Mar-Apr;87:13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2024.01.009. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
5
Factor Structure and Validation of the Revised Suicide Crisis Inventory in a Korean Population.韩国人群中修订版自杀危机量表的因子结构与效度验证
Psychiatry Investig. 2023 Feb;20(2):162-173. doi: 10.30773/pi.2022.0208. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
6
Factors associated with a lack of health care utilization among Veterans after a positive suicide screen in the emergency department.与急诊部进行阳性自杀筛查后,退伍军人缺乏医疗保健利用相关的因素。
Acad Emerg Med. 2023 Apr;30(4):321-330. doi: 10.1111/acem.14695. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
7
Suicide Screening Tools for Pediatric Emergency Department Patients: A Systematic Review.儿科急诊科患者自杀筛查工具:一项系统评价
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 12;13:916731. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.916731. eCollection 2022.
8
Identifying suicidal subtypes and dynamic indicators of increasing and decreasing suicide risk in active duty military personnel: Study protocol.识别现役军人自杀亚型以及自杀风险增减的动态指标:研究方案。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2021 Feb 16;21:100752. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100752. eCollection 2021 Mar.
9
Using weak supervision and deep learning to classify clinical notes for identification of current suicidal ideation.利用弱监督和深度学习对临床记录进行分类,以识别当前的自杀意念。
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Apr;136:95-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.01.052. Epub 2021 Feb 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Suicide Prevention in an Emergency Department Population: The ED-SAFE Study.急诊科人群中的自杀预防:急诊安全研究
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Jun 1;74(6):563-570. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0678.
2
Risk factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors: A meta-analysis of 50 years of research.自杀意念和行为的风险因素:50 年研究的荟萃分析。
Psychol Bull. 2017 Feb;143(2):187-232. doi: 10.1037/bul0000084. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
3
Recent Advances in Means Safety as a Suicide Prevention Strategy.作为自杀预防策略的手段安全方面的最新进展。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2016 Oct;18(10):96. doi: 10.1007/s11920-016-0731-0.
4
Psychometric Reevaluation of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale: Findings From a Prospective, Inpatient Cohort of Severely Mentally Ill Adults.哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表的心理测量再评估:来自重度精神疾病成年住院患者前瞻性队列的研究结果
J Clin Psychiatry. 2016 Jul;77(7):e867-73. doi: 10.4088/JCP.15m10069.
5
Suicide risk characteristics among aborted, interrupted, and actual suicide attempters.流产、中断及实际自杀未遂者的自杀风险特征。
Psychiatry Res. 2016 Aug 30;242:357-364. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.05.051. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
6
Staff Views of an Emergency Department Intervention Using Safety Planning and Structured Follow-Up with Suicidal Veterans.工作人员对急诊科针对自杀退伍军人采用安全计划和结构化随访干预措施的看法。
Arch Suicide Res. 2017 Jan 2;21(1):127-137. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2016.1164642. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
7
Suicide, Suicide Attempts, and Suicidal Ideation.自杀、自杀未遂和自杀意念。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2016;12:307-30. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093204. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
8
Improving Suicide Risk Screening and Detection in the Emergency Department.改善急诊科的自杀风险筛查与检测
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Apr;50(4):445-453. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.09.029. Epub 2015 Dec 4.
9
Factors Associated With Suicide Outcomes 12 Months After Screening Positive for Suicide Risk in the Emergency Department.急诊科自杀风险筛查呈阳性后12个月与自杀结局相关的因素。
Psychiatr Serv. 2016 Feb;67(2):206-13. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400513. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
10
Detection and classification of suicidal behavior and nonsuicidal self-injury behavior in emergency departments.急诊科中自杀行为和非自杀性自伤行为的检测与分类
J Clin Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;76(10):1397-403. doi: 10.4088/JCP.14m09015.