• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后2年未获得影像学融合患者的长期影像学及功能预后

Long-Term Radiographic and Functional Outcomes of Patients With Absence of Radiographic Union at 2 Years After Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

作者信息

Lee Christopher J, Boody Barrett S, Demeter Jaclyn, Smucker Joseph D, Sasso Rick C

机构信息

Indiana Spine Group, Carmel, IN, USA.

出版信息

Global Spine J. 2020 Sep;10(6):741-747. doi: 10.1177/2192568219874768. Epub 2019 Sep 16.

DOI:10.1177/2192568219874768
PMID:32707013
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7383798/
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective radiographic investigation.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term radiographic and functional outcomes of patients in whom there is absence of radiographic union at 2 years after single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

METHODS

Thirty-one patients were evaluated at standard postoperative time intervals per index trial protocol. Plain film radiographic fusion criteria at the arthrodesis level was defined as interspinous motion (ISM) <1 mm with corresponding motion at a non-arthrodesed superjacent level ISM ≥4 mm. Radiographs and functional outcome measures were acquired at each follow-up visit. Delayed union was defined as lack of radiographic union by 24 months.

RESULTS

Nine patients demonstrated radiographic evidence of delayed radiographic union at 24 months. Of those 9 patients, 5 patients demonstrated evidence of union during the follow-up period to 72 months. Despite the absence of radiographic union based on our criteria, 3 of the 4 remaining patients reported remarkable improvements in pain scores and functional outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The natural history of delayed union at 24 months after ACDF was still favorable despite the prolonged delay in union. The majority of patients (5 of 9) without radiographic union at 24 months did proceed to radiographic union by final follow-up. In addition, patients that did not meet our criteria for fusion maintained postoperative improvements in patient-reported outcome scores. In summary, our study patients undergoing a single-level ACDF with asymptomatic radiographic delayed union at 24 months can expect maintained improvements in postoperative patient-reported outcomes scores and can still progress to successful radiographic fusion.

摘要

研究设计

回顾性影像学调查。

目的

评估单节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)后2年仍无影像学融合的患者的长期影像学和功能结局。

方法

根据每项指标试验方案,在标准术后时间间隔对31例患者进行评估。关节融合水平的平片影像学融合标准定义为棘突间运动(ISM)<1mm,且相邻未融合节段的相应运动ISM≥4mm。每次随访时均获取X线片和功能结局指标。延迟融合定义为24个月时无影像学融合。

结果

9例患者在24个月时显示有延迟影像学融合的影像学证据。在这9例患者中,5例在随访至72个月期间显示有融合证据。尽管根据我们的标准没有影像学融合,但其余4例患者中有3例报告疼痛评分和功能结局有显著改善。

结论

尽管融合延迟延长,但ACDF术后24个月延迟融合的自然病程仍然良好。大多数在24个月时无影像学融合的患者(9例中的5例)在最终随访时实现了影像学融合。此外,不符合我们融合标准的患者术后患者报告结局评分仍有改善。总之,我们的研究表明,接受单节段ACDF且在24个月时有无症状影像学延迟融合的患者,术后患者报告结局评分有望持续改善,并且仍可成功实现影像学融合。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de88/7383798/8a27e4a92025/10.1177_2192568219874768-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de88/7383798/e3d773b2b6ea/10.1177_2192568219874768-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de88/7383798/8a27e4a92025/10.1177_2192568219874768-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de88/7383798/e3d773b2b6ea/10.1177_2192568219874768-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de88/7383798/8a27e4a92025/10.1177_2192568219874768-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Long-Term Radiographic and Functional Outcomes of Patients With Absence of Radiographic Union at 2 Years After Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.单节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后2年未获得影像学融合患者的长期影像学及功能预后
Global Spine J. 2020 Sep;10(6):741-747. doi: 10.1177/2192568219874768. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
2
Does screw length for primary two-level ACDF influence pseudarthrosis risk?初次行双节段前路颈椎间盘切除融合术时螺钉长度是否会影响假关节形成风险?
Spine J. 2020 Nov;20(11):1752-1760. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.07.002. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
3
Comparison of clinical and radiographic outcome in instrumented anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with or without direct uncovertebral joint decompression.前路颈椎间盘切除融合术伴或不伴直接钩椎关节减压的临床和影像学结果比较
Spine J. 2004 Nov-Dec;4(6):629-35. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.04.009.
4
Radiographic and clinical outcomes following single-level anterior cervical discectomy and allograft fusion without plate placement or cervical collar.单节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除及同种异体骨融合且未使用钢板固定或佩戴颈托后的影像学和临床结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2008 May;8(5):420-8. doi: 10.3171/SPI/2008/8/5/420.
5
Prospective randomized study of cervical arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with long-term follow-up: results in 74 patients from a single site.前瞻性随机研究颈椎关节成形术与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术,长期随访:单中心 74 例患者的结果。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Jan;18(1):36-42. doi: 10.3171/2012.9.SPINE12555. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
6
Four-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusions: Results Following Multilevel Cervical Fusion With a Minimum 1-Year Follow-up.四节段颈椎前路减压融合术:多节段颈椎融合术后至少 1 年随访结果。
Clin Spine Surg. 2021 May 1;34(4):E243-E247. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001116.
7
What is the most accurate radiographic criterion to determine anterior cervical fusion?确定前路颈椎融合术最准确的影像学标准是什么?
Spine J. 2019 Mar;19(3):469-475. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 7.
8
Cervical kinematics and radiological changes after Discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion.与融合术相比,Discover人工椎间盘置换术后的颈椎运动学及影像学变化。
Spine J. 2014 Jun 1;14(6):867-77. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.432. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
9
Does rigid instrumentation increase the fusion rate in one-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?在单节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术中,使用坚强内固定是否会提高融合率?
Spine J. 2004 Nov-Dec;4(6):636-43. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.04.010.
10
Two-level corpectomy versus three-level discectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a comparison of perioperative, radiographic, and clinical outcomes.颈椎脊髓病的两级椎体次全切除术与三级椎间盘切除术:围手术期、影像学及临床结果比较
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Sep;23(3):280-9. doi: 10.3171/2014.12.SPINE14545. Epub 2015 Jun 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of bony fusion after anterior cervical discectomy: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.颈椎前路椎间盘切除术后骨融合的评估:一项系统文献综述和荟萃分析。
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Apr 25;48(1):386. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03542-w.
2
Comparison of efficacy between endoscope-assisted anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and open ACDF in the treatment of single-segment cervical spondylotic myelopathy.内镜辅助前路颈椎间盘切除融合术与开放前路颈椎间盘切除融合术治疗单节段脊髓型颈椎病的疗效比较。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Jan 5;19(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04514-w.
3
Values derived from patient reported outcomes in spine surgery: a systematic review of the minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptom state.

本文引用的文献

1
Radiological Fusion Criteria of Postoperative Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后的影像学融合标准:一项系统评价
Global Spine J. 2018 Oct;8(7):739-750. doi: 10.1177/2192568218755141. Epub 2018 Feb 11.
2
Correlation between Short-Form 36 Scores and Neck Disability Index in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.接受颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术患者的简明健康状况调查36项评分与颈部功能障碍指数之间的相关性
Asian Spine J. 2018 Aug;12(4):691-696. doi: 10.31616/asj.2018.12.4.691. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
3
What is the most accurate radiographic criterion to determine anterior cervical fusion?
脊柱外科患者报告结局评估值:最小临床重要差异、显著临床获益和患者可接受症状状态的系统评价。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Oct;32(10):3333-3351. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07896-x. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
确定前路颈椎融合术最准确的影像学标准是什么?
Spine J. 2019 Mar;19(3):469-475. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 7.
4
Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Palsy Is More Frequent After Secondary than After Primary Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Insights from a Registry of 525 Patients.与初次颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术相比,翻修颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后喉返神经麻痹更为常见:来自525例患者登记处的见解。
World Neurosurg. 2018 Aug;116:e1047-e1053. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.05.162. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
5
Voice and swallowing outcomes following reoperative anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a 2-team surgical approach.采用双团队手术方式行二次前路颈椎间盘切除融合术后的嗓音和吞咽结果。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Feb;28(2):140-148. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.SPINE161104. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
6
What Is the Fate of Pseudarthrosis Detected 1 Year After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion?前路颈椎间盘切除融合术后 1 年发现假关节,其结局如何?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Jan 1;43(1):E23-E28. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002077.
7
Pseudarthrosis of the Cervical Spine: Risk Factors, Diagnosis and Management.颈椎假关节:危险因素、诊断与治疗
Asian Spine J. 2016 Aug;10(4):776-86. doi: 10.4184/asj.2016.10.4.776. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
8
Reoperation After Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Meta-analysis.颈椎间盘置换术与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后再次手术:一项荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 May;474(5):1307-16. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4707-5. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
9
Efficacy of i-Factor Bone Graft versus Autograft in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Results of the Prospective, Randomized, Single-blinded Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Study.i因子骨移植与自体骨移植在前路颈椎间盘切除融合术中的疗效:前瞻性、随机、单盲的美国食品药品监督管理局研究器械豁免研究结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Jul 1;41(13):1075-1083. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001466.
10
Pseudoarthrosis rates in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术中的假关节形成率:一项荟萃分析。
Spine J. 2015 Sep 1;15(9):2016-27. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.05.010. Epub 2015 May 15.