College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, 107 Wiggins Rd, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5E5, Canada.
College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, 107 Wiggins Rd, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5E5, Canada; School of Rehabilitation Science, University of Saskatchewan, Suite 3400, 3rd Floor, 104 Clinic Pl, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 2Z4, Canada.
Gait Posture. 2020 Sep;81:96-101. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.07.015. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
Mobility aids are commonly prescribed to offload an injured lower extremity. Device selection may impact stance foot loading patterns and foot health in clinical populations at risk of foot ulceration.
Two questions motivated this study: How does device selection influence peak plantar and regional (rearfoot, mid foot and forefoot) foot forces on the stance foot? Does device selection influence peak, cumulative, and regional plantar forces within a 200 m walking trial?
Twenty-one older adults walked 200 m at self-selected pace in four randomized conditions for this prospective crossover study. Participants used a walker, crutches, wheeled knee walker (WKW), and no assistive device (control condition). Plantar forces were measured using a wireless in-shoe system (Loadsol, Novel Inc., St. Paul, MN). Repeated measures analyses of variance were used to determine differences in peak and cumulative total and regional forces among walking conditions. Paired sample t-tests compared forces during first and last 30 s epochs of each condition to determine device influence over time.
The WKW reduced peak net forces by 0.29 and 0.35 bodyweight (BW) when compared to the walker or control condition with similar trends in all foot regions. Crutch use had similar peak forces as control. There were no differences in the number of steps taken within devices comparing first and last epochs. Crutches had a 0.04 and 0.07 BW increase in peak net and forefoot forces during the last epoch. Walker use had 66.44 BW lower cumulative forefoot forces in the last epoch.
Crutches had similar stance foot loading as normal walking while a walker lowered forefoot forces at the expense of increased steps. A WKW may be the best choice to 'protect' tissues in the stance foot from exposure to peak and cumulative forces in the forefoot region.
助行器常用于减轻受伤下肢的负荷。设备选择可能会影响临床中易发生足部溃疡人群的站立时足部的负重模式和足部健康。
两个问题促使了这项研究的开展:设备选择如何影响站立时足部的峰值足底和区域(足跟、中足和前足)足部力?设备选择是否会影响 200 米步行试验中的峰值、累积和区域足底力?
在这项前瞻性交叉研究中,21 名老年人以自我选择的速度在四种随机条件下行走 200 米。参与者使用助行器、拐杖、轮式膝步行器(WKW)和无辅助设备(对照条件)。使用无线鞋内系统(Loadsol,Novel Inc.,明尼苏达州圣保罗)测量足底力。采用重复测量方差分析来确定不同步行条件下峰值和累积总力及区域力的差异。配对样本 t 检验比较每个条件的前 30 秒和后 30 秒的力,以确定设备随时间的影响。
与使用助行器或对照条件相比,WKW 降低了 0.29 和 0.35 倍体重(BW)的峰值净力,所有足部区域均呈现出相似的趋势。拐杖的峰值力与对照条件相似。在比较前、后两个时间段时,在使用助行器或对照条件时,使用设备的步数没有差异。在最后一个时间段,拐杖的峰值净力和前足力分别增加了 0.04 和 0.07 BW。使用助行器时,最后一个时间段的累积前足力降低了 66.44 BW。
拐杖的站立时足部负重模式与正常行走相似,而助行器则降低了前足力,同时增加了步数。WKW 可能是“保护”站立时足部前区组织免受峰值和累积力影响的最佳选择。