International Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory (INL), Avda Mestre José Veiga, 4715-310 Braga, Portugal.
Molecules. 2020 Jul 18;25(14):3277. doi: 10.3390/molecules25143277.
Complexes combining nucleic acids with lipids and polymers (lipopolyplexes) show great promise for gene therapy since they enable compositional, physical and functional versatility to be optimized for therapeutic efficiency. When developing lipopolyplexes for gene delivery, one of the first evaluations performed is an in vitro transfection efficiency experiment. Many different in vitro models can be used, and the effect of the model on the experiment outcome has not been thoroughly studied. The objective of this work was to compare the insights obtained from three different in vitro models, as well as the potential limitations associated with each of them. We have prepared a series of lipopolyplex formulations with three different cationic polymers (poly-l-lysine, bioreducible poly-l-lysine and polyethyleneimine), and assessed their in vitro biological performance in 2D monolayer cell culture, 3D spheroid culture and microdroplet-based single-cell culture. Lipopolyplexes from different polymers presented varying degrees of transfection efficiency in all models. The best-performing formulation in 2D culture was the polyethyleneimine lipopolyplex, while lipoplexes prepared with bioreducible poly-l-lysine were the only ones achieving any transfection in microdroplet-enabled cell culture. None of the prepared formulations achieved significant gene transfection in 3D culture. All of the prepared formulations were well tolerated by cells in 2D culture, while at least one formulation (poly-l-lysine polyplex) delayed 3D spheroid growth. These results highlight the need for selecting the appropriate in vitro model depending on the intended application.
将核酸与脂质和聚合物结合的复合物(脂多聚复合物)在基因治疗中具有很大的应用前景,因为它们能够优化组成、物理和功能的多样性,以提高治疗效率。在开发用于基因传递的脂多聚复合物时,首先要进行的评估之一是体外转染效率实验。可以使用许多不同的体外模型,而模型对实验结果的影响尚未得到深入研究。本工作的目的是比较三种不同的体外模型所获得的见解,以及与每种模型相关的潜在局限性。我们已经制备了一系列具有三种不同阳离子聚合物(聚赖氨酸、生物还原型聚赖氨酸和聚乙烯亚胺)的脂多聚复合物,并在 2D 单层细胞培养、3D 球体培养和基于微滴的单细胞培养中评估了它们的体外生物学性能。不同聚合物的脂多聚复合物在所有模型中均表现出不同程度的转染效率。在 2D 培养中表现最好的制剂是聚乙烯亚胺脂多聚复合物,而用生物还原型聚赖氨酸制备的脂复合物是唯一在微滴支持的细胞培养中实现任何转染的脂复合物。在 3D 培养中,没有一种制备的制剂能实现显著的基因转染。所有制备的制剂在 2D 培养的细胞中均具有良好的耐受性,而至少有一种制剂(聚赖氨酸脂复合物)延迟了 3D 球体的生长。这些结果强调了根据预期应用选择合适的体外模型的必要性。