Carretero-González Alberto, Lora David, Martín Sobrino Isabel, Sáez Sanz Irene, Bourlon María T, Anido Herranz Urbano, Martínez Chanzá Nieves, Castellano Daniel, de Velasco Guillermo
Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, 28041 Madrid, Spain.
Clinical Research Unit, IMAS12-CIBERESP, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, 28041 Madrid, Spain.
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Jul 17;12(7):1945. doi: 10.3390/cancers12071945.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are soluble antibodies that have dramatically changed the outcomes including overall survival in a subset of kidney tumors, specifically in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). To date, there is no a single predictive biomarker approved to be used to select the patients that achieve benefit from ICIs targeting. It seems reasonable to analyze whether the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression could be useful. To assess the role of PD-L1 expression as a potential predictive biomarker for benefit of ICIs in RCC patients, we performed a search of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing ICIs (monotherapy or in combination with other therapies) to standard of care in metastatic RCC patients according to PRISMA guidelines. Trials must have included subgroup analyses evaluating the selected outcomes (progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)) in different subsets of patients according to PD-L1 expression on tumor samples. Hazard ratios with confidence intervals were used as the measure of efficacy between groups. A total of 4635 patients (six studies) were included (ICIs arm: 2367 patients; standard of care arm: 2268 patients). Globally, PFS and OS results favored ICIs. Differential expression of PD-L1 on tumor samples could select a subset of patients who could benefit more in terms of PFS (those with higher levels; -value for difference between subgroups: <0.0001) but it did not seem to impact in OS results (-value for difference: 0.63). As different methods to assess PD-L1 positivity were used among trials, this heterogeneity could have an influence on the results. PD-L1 could represent a biomarker to test PFS in clinical trials but its value for OS is less clear. In this meta-analysis, the usefulness of PD-L1 expression as a predictive biomarker to select treatment in metastatic RCC patients was not clearly shown.
免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)是可溶性抗体,已显著改变了包括部分肾肿瘤(特别是肾细胞癌,RCC)患者总生存期在内的治疗结局。迄今为止,尚无经批准用于选择能从ICI靶向治疗中获益患者的单一预测生物标志物。分析程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)表达是否有用似乎是合理的。为评估PD-L1表达作为RCC患者ICI治疗获益潜在预测生物标志物的作用,我们根据PRISMA指南检索了比较ICI(单药治疗或与其他疗法联合)与转移性RCC患者标准治疗的随机临床试验(RCT)。试验必须包括亚组分析,根据肿瘤样本上的PD-L1表达评估不同患者亚组的选定结局(无进展生存期,PFS;和总生存期,OS)。组间疗效衡量指标采用带有置信区间的风险比。共纳入4635例患者(6项研究)(ICI组:2367例患者;标准治疗组:2268例患者)。总体而言,PFS和OS结果支持ICI。肿瘤样本上PD-L1的差异表达可选择出在PFS方面获益更多的患者亚组(表达水平较高者;亚组间差异的P值:<0.0001),但似乎对OS结果无影响(差异的P值:0.63)。由于各试验采用了不同的评估PD-L1阳性的方法,这种异质性可能会对结果产生影响。PD-L1可能是临床试验中用于检测PFS的生物标志物,但其对OS的价值尚不清楚。在这项荟萃分析中,未明确显示PD-L1表达作为转移性RCC患者选择治疗的预测生物标志物的有用性。