Suppr超能文献

丛集性头痛中动态广泛机械敏感性的相关性。

Association of dynamic and widespread mechanical sensitivity in cluster headache.

机构信息

Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.

Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Acta Neurol Belg. 2020 Oct;120(5):1265-1270. doi: 10.1007/s13760-020-01450-y. Epub 2020 Jul 24.

Abstract

We investigated if dynamic pressure pain sensitivity in the symptomatic area is associated with pressure sensitivity in local and distant pain-free areas in cluster headache (CH). A pressure algometry set consisting of 8 rollers with fixed pressure levels ranging from 500 to 5300 g was used to assess dynamic pressure pain sensitivity in men with episodic CH. Each roller was moved from an anterior-to-posterior direction over the temporalis muscle. The load level of the first painful roller was considered the dynamic pain threshold (DPT). Further, pain elicited during DPT (roller evoked pain) was also assessed. We used a pressure algometer to determine pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) over the temporalis muscle, C5/C6 joint, second metacarpal, and tibialis anterior. Patients were assessed in an asymptomatic (remission) phase, at least 6 months after their last cluster period and without taking pharmacological treatment. Forty men with episodic CH (mean age 42 years) were included. Both outcomes, DPTs (r = 0.781, P < 0.001) and roller-evoked pain (r = 0.586; P < 0.001) were bilaterally correlated. Further, DPT, but not roller-evoked pain, was moderately associated with PPTs measured at the symptomatic (temporalis: r = 0.665, P < 0.001) and distant pain-free (C5-C6 joint: r = 0.389, P = 0.013; second metacarpal: r = 0.551, P < 0.001; and, tibialis anterior: r = 0.308, P = 0.035) points. Dynamic pressure sensitivity in the trigeminal area was correlated to pressure pain sensitivity at both symptomatic and distant pain-free areas in men with CH supporting the use of roller pressure algometry. Dynamic pressure algometry may be a new tool for assessing the status of sensitization in primary headaches.

摘要

我们研究了在丛集性头痛(CH)患者的症状区域中,动态压力疼痛敏感性是否与局部和远处无痛区域的压力敏感性相关。使用由 8 个滚轮组成的压力测痛仪套件,每个滚轮的压力水平固定在 500 至 5300g 之间,以评估发作性 CH 男性的动态压力疼痛敏感性。每个滚轮从前向后在颞肌上移动。第一痛性滚轮的负载水平被认为是动态疼痛阈值(DPT)。此外,还评估了 DPT 期间引起的疼痛(滚轮诱发疼痛)。我们使用压力测痛仪在颞肌、C5/C6 关节、第二掌骨和胫骨前肌上测定压力疼痛阈值(PPT)。患者在无症状(缓解)期进行评估,即在最后一次丛集期至少 6 个月后,且未接受药物治疗。纳入了 40 名发作性 CH 男性(平均年龄 42 岁)。双侧的 DPT(r=0.781,P<0.001)和滚轮诱发疼痛(r=0.586;P<0.001)均呈正相关。进一步,DPT 与在症状部位(颞肌:r=0.665,P<0.001)和远处无痛部位(C5-C6 关节:r=0.389,P=0.013;第二掌骨:r=0.551,P<0.001;胫骨前肌:r=0.308,P=0.035)测量的 PPT 呈中度相关,但滚轮诱发疼痛无相关性。CH 男性的三叉神经区域的动态压力敏感性与症状和远处无痛区域的压力疼痛敏感性相关,支持使用滚轮压力测痛仪。动态压力测痛法可能是评估原发性头痛患者致敏状态的一种新工具。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验