• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美在追随者眼中:社交媒体时代的面部审美。

Beauty is in the eye of the follower: Facial aesthetics in the age of social media.

机构信息

Section of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States of America.

Rush Medical College, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States of America.

出版信息

Am J Otolaryngol. 2020 Nov-Dec;41(6):102643. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102643. Epub 2020 Jul 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102643
PMID:32711235
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The advent of social media has influenced the relationship between aesthetic surgeons and their patients, as well as the motivations of such patients to seek cosmetic surgery.

AIMS & OBJECTIVES: To determine how the cephalometric proportions of modern social media models fit with historical canons of beauty.

MATERIALS & METHODS: Frontal and lateral photographs of 20 high-influence female Instagram models were obtained and evaluated for cephalometric measures. The means of these measures were compared with previous reports in the literature.

RESULTS

Cephalometric measurements of social media models were in agreement with historical ideals of beauty for Nostril axis (120.7°), Goode's ratio (0.6), Nasofacial angle (35.7°), Nasofrontal angle (130.9°), and the horizontal thirds. Results were discrepant from historical ideals for the Nasolabial angle (82.6°) and the vertical facial fifths.

CONCLUSION

Cephalometric measurements of social media models in the digital age closely resemble the ideal values proposed by previous authors. Due to a preference for larger or altered lip profiles, nostril axis is a more reliable measure of nasal tip rotation than nasolabial angle.

摘要

背景

社交媒体的出现影响了美容外科医生与其患者之间的关系,以及寻求美容手术的患者的动机。

目的

确定现代社交媒体模特的头影测量比例与历史审美标准的契合度。

材料与方法

获取了 20 位具有高影响力的女性 Instagram 模特的正面和侧面照片,并对头影测量指标进行评估。将这些指标的平均值与文献中的先前报道进行比较。

结果

社交媒体模特的头影测量指标与鼻孔轴(120.7°)、古德比(0.6)、鼻面角(35.7°)、鼻额角(130.9°)和面部水平三等分的美学标准相符。但与鼻唇角(82.6°)和面部垂直五等分存在差异。

结论

在数字时代,社交媒体模特的头影测量指标与之前作者提出的理想值非常相似。由于人们偏爱更大或改变后的唇形,与鼻唇角相比,鼻孔轴是衡量鼻尖旋转的更可靠指标。

相似文献

1
Beauty is in the eye of the follower: Facial aesthetics in the age of social media.美在追随者眼中:社交媒体时代的面部审美。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2020 Nov-Dec;41(6):102643. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102643. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
2
Anthropometric study of the caucasian nose in the city of Curitiba: relevance of population evaluation.库里蒂巴市白种人鼻子的人体测量研究:人口评估的相关性。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Jul-Aug;84(4):486-493. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2017.06.004. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
3
Analysis of patient-determined preoperative computer imaging.患者自主决定的术前计算机成像分析。
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2009 Sep-Oct;11(5):290-5. doi: 10.1001/archfacial.2009.61.
4
The Ideals of Facial Beauty Among Chinese Aesthetic Practitioners: Results from a Large National Survey.中国人审美从业者对面部美的理想:一项大型全国调查的结果。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2019 Feb;43(1):102-114. doi: 10.1007/s00266-018-1241-8. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
5
Ideals of Facial Beauty Amongst the Chinese Population: Results from a Large National Survey.中国人群对面部美的理想标准:一项大型全国性调查的结果
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018 Dec;42(6):1540-1550. doi: 10.1007/s00266-018-1188-9. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
6
Ethnic Rhinoplasty in Female Patients: The Neoclassical Canons Revisited.女性患者的种族鼻整形术:对新古典主义准则的重新审视
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018 Apr;42(2):565-576. doi: 10.1007/s00266-017-1051-4. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
7
Population-based assessment of currently proposed ideals of nasal tip projection and rotation in young women.基于人群的年轻女性鼻尖突出度和旋转度当前提出的理想标准评估。
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2014 Sep-Oct;16(5):310-8. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2014.228.
8
Factors associated with the beauty of soft-tissue profile.软组织侧貌美学相关因素。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019 Jun;155(6):832-843. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.07.020.
9
Do the neoclassical canons still describe the beauty of faces? An anthropometric study on 50 Caucasian models.新古典主义准则是否仍然描述了面容之美?对 50 名白种人模特的人体测量学研究。
Prog Orthod. 2010;11(1):13-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pio.2010.04.003. Epub 2010 May 11.
10
The perception of facial aesthetics in a young Spanish population.年轻西班牙人群对面部美学的认知。
Eur J Orthod. 2012 Jun;34(3):335-9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjr014. Epub 2011 Mar 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Filling the Gap: Facial Anatomy and Safe Lower Lip Injection Practices.填补空白:面部解剖与安全的下唇注射操作
J Clin Med. 2025 May 6;14(9):3214. doi: 10.3390/jcm14093214.
2
Lip Augmentation with Soft Tissue Fillers: Social Media, Perceptual Adaptation, and Shifting Beauty Trends beyond Golden Standard Ideals.软组织填充剂丰唇:社交媒体、感知适应与超越黄金标准理想的审美趋势转变
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Oct 29;12(10):e6238. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006238. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Predicting optimal patient-specific postoperative facial landmarks for patients with craniomaxillofacial deformities.
预测颅颌面畸形患者最佳的个体化术后面部分区标志点。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Nov;53(11):934-941. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2024.05.004. Epub 2024 May 23.
4
Truth Lies in the Depths: Novel Insights into Facial Aesthetic Measurements from a U.S. Survey Panel.真相深藏:美国调查小组对面部美学测量的新见解。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Oct;48(19):3711-3717. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04022-0. Epub 2024 May 21.
5
Predicting Optimal Patient-Specific Postoperative Facial Landmarks for Patients with Craniomaxillofacial Deformities.预测颅颌面畸形患者术后最佳个体化面部标志点
medRxiv. 2023 Dec 14:2023.12.13.23299919. doi: 10.1101/2023.12.13.23299919.
6
Soft tissue changes with skeletal anchorage in comparison to conventional anchorage protocols in the treatment of bimaxillary proclination patients treated with premolar extraction : A systematic review.支抗控制下的软组织改变与传统支抗方案在双颌前突拔牙病例中的对比:一项系统评价。
J Orofac Orthop. 2024 Mar;85(2):146-162. doi: 10.1007/s00056-022-00411-9. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
7
Aesthetic Dentistry, How You Say and How You See: A 500-People Survey on Digital Preview and Color Perception.美容牙科:你的表达方式与视觉感受——一项关于数字预览和色彩感知的500人调查
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2020 Sep 21;12:377-389. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S274669. eCollection 2020.