Tian Jian, Rui Yongjun, Xu Yajun, Yang Wengbo, Xu Tonglong, Chen Xueming, Zhang Xingfei
Department of Orthopedics, Soochow University Affiliated Wuxi Ninth People's Hospital, Wuxi, China.
Department of Orthopedics, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Nov;140(11):1775-1782. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03535-y. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
The Krackow technique has the advantage of high strength, though it is not minimally invasive. The "Locking Block Modified Krackow" (LBMK) peri-tendon fixation technique was designed for minimally invasive surgery. This study aimed to compare the biomechanics of LBMK with Kessler and Percutaneous Achilles Repair System (PARS) techniques using a simulated early rehabilitation program.
Thirty-fresh bovine Achilles tendon specimens were randomly assigned to the LBMK, Kessler, and PARS groups (n = 10). In LBMK group, the main suture configuration was the LBMK technique, and the transverse suture was used as the secondary suture configuration. The Kessler group employed three suture configurations, two sagittal, one coronal plane. In the PARS group, two transverse and one locking sutures were placed at either end of the tendon. Each repaired specimen underwent two cyclic loading protocols (20-100 N, 20-190 N), 500 cycles, followed by measurement of the gap between the tendon ends. All specimens underwent a load-to-failure test at a 25 mm/s stretching rate.
After the first loading cycle, the average gaps of the LBMK, Kessler and PARS groups were 0.76 ± 0.44 mm, 1.80 ± 0.82 mm, and 2.66 ± 1.04 mm, respectively. The LBMK group had a significantly reduced gap than the other groups (p < 0.01). The LBMK group gaps were all within 2 mm. The Kessler and PARS groups had six, and two specimens within 2 mm, respectively. After the second loading cycle, the average end gaps of the LBMK, Kessler, and PARS groups were 3.68 ± 1.08 mm, 5.70 ± 0.89 mm and 7.59 ± 1.26 mm, respectively. The LBMK group had a significantly reduced average gap than the other groups (p < 0.01). The maximum load-to-failure was highest 732.8 ± 138 N in the LBMK than the other groups (p < 0.01).
The biomechanical strength of the LBMK suture was significantly greater than Kessler and PARS. The reduced gap in the LBMK group suggests superior resistance to gap formation, which may occur during early postoperative rehabilitation.
Krackow技术具有高强度的优势,尽管它并非微创手术。“锁定块改良Krackow”(LBMK)肌腱周围固定技术是为微创手术设计的。本研究旨在使用模拟早期康复方案比较LBMK与Kessler和经皮跟腱修复系统(PARS)技术的生物力学。
将30个新鲜牛跟腱标本随机分为LBMK组、Kessler组和PARS组(n = 10)。在LBMK组中,主要缝合构型为LBMK技术,横向缝合用作辅助缝合构型。Kessler组采用三种缝合构型,两条矢状缝,一条冠状缝。在PARS组中,在肌腱两端放置两条横向缝和一条锁定缝。每个修复后的标本进行两种循环加载方案(20 - 100 N,20 - 190 N),500个循环,然后测量肌腱两端之间的间隙。所有标本以25 mm/s的拉伸速率进行破坏载荷试验。
在第一个加载循环后,LBMK组、Kessler组和PARS组的平均间隙分别为0.76±0.44 mm、1.80±0.82 mm和2.66±1.04 mm。LBMK组的间隙明显小于其他组(p < 0.01)。LBMK组的间隙均在2 mm以内。Kessler组和PARS组分别有6个和2个标本的间隙在2 mm以内。在第二个加载循环后,LBMK组、Kessler组和PARS组的平均末端间隙分别为3.68±1.08 mm、5.70±0.89 mm和7.59±1.26 mm。LBMK组的平均间隙明显小于其他组(p < 0.01)。LBMK组的最大破坏载荷最高,为732.8±138 N,高于其他组(p < 0.01)。
LBMK缝合的生物力学强度明显大于Kessler和PARS。LBMK组间隙减小表明其对术后早期康复期间可能出现的间隙形成具有更强的抵抗力。