Suppr超能文献

跟腱缝合修复技术的生物力学比较:锁定块改良Krackow法、Kessler法以及经皮跟腱修复系统与早期康复计划在体外牛模型中的比较

A biomechanical comparison of Achilles tendon suture repair techniques: Locking Block Modified Krackow, Kessler, and Percutaneous Achilles Repair System with the early rehabilitation program in vitro bovine model.

作者信息

Tian Jian, Rui Yongjun, Xu Yajun, Yang Wengbo, Xu Tonglong, Chen Xueming, Zhang Xingfei

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Soochow University Affiliated Wuxi Ninth People's Hospital, Wuxi, China.

Department of Orthopedics, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Nov;140(11):1775-1782. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03535-y. Epub 2020 Jul 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Krackow technique has the advantage of high strength, though it is not minimally invasive. The "Locking Block Modified Krackow" (LBMK) peri-tendon fixation technique was designed for minimally invasive surgery. This study aimed to compare the biomechanics of LBMK with Kessler and Percutaneous Achilles Repair System (PARS) techniques using a simulated early rehabilitation program.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-fresh bovine Achilles tendon specimens were randomly assigned to the LBMK, Kessler, and PARS groups (n = 10). In LBMK group, the main suture configuration was the LBMK technique, and the transverse suture was used as the secondary suture configuration. The Kessler group employed three suture configurations, two sagittal, one coronal plane. In the PARS group, two transverse and one locking sutures were placed at either end of the tendon. Each repaired specimen underwent two cyclic loading protocols (20-100 N, 20-190 N), 500 cycles, followed by measurement of the gap between the tendon ends. All specimens underwent a load-to-failure test at a 25 mm/s stretching rate.

RESULTS

After the first loading cycle, the average gaps of the LBMK, Kessler and PARS groups were 0.76 ± 0.44 mm, 1.80 ± 0.82 mm, and 2.66 ± 1.04 mm, respectively. The LBMK group had a significantly reduced gap than the other groups (p < 0.01). The LBMK group gaps were all within 2 mm. The Kessler and PARS groups had six, and two specimens within 2 mm, respectively. After the second loading cycle, the average end gaps of the LBMK, Kessler, and PARS groups were 3.68 ± 1.08 mm, 5.70 ± 0.89 mm and 7.59 ± 1.26 mm, respectively. The LBMK group had a significantly reduced average gap than the other groups (p < 0.01). The maximum load-to-failure was highest 732.8 ± 138 N in the LBMK than the other groups (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The biomechanical strength of the LBMK suture was significantly greater than Kessler and PARS. The reduced gap in the LBMK group suggests superior resistance to gap formation, which may occur during early postoperative rehabilitation.

摘要

背景

Krackow技术具有高强度的优势,尽管它并非微创手术。“锁定块改良Krackow”(LBMK)肌腱周围固定技术是为微创手术设计的。本研究旨在使用模拟早期康复方案比较LBMK与Kessler和经皮跟腱修复系统(PARS)技术的生物力学。

材料与方法

将30个新鲜牛跟腱标本随机分为LBMK组、Kessler组和PARS组(n = 10)。在LBMK组中,主要缝合构型为LBMK技术,横向缝合用作辅助缝合构型。Kessler组采用三种缝合构型,两条矢状缝,一条冠状缝。在PARS组中,在肌腱两端放置两条横向缝和一条锁定缝。每个修复后的标本进行两种循环加载方案(20 - 100 N,20 - 190 N),500个循环,然后测量肌腱两端之间的间隙。所有标本以25 mm/s的拉伸速率进行破坏载荷试验。

结果

在第一个加载循环后,LBMK组、Kessler组和PARS组的平均间隙分别为0.76±0.44 mm、1.80±0.82 mm和2.66±1.04 mm。LBMK组的间隙明显小于其他组(p < 0.01)。LBMK组的间隙均在2 mm以内。Kessler组和PARS组分别有6个和2个标本的间隙在2 mm以内。在第二个加载循环后,LBMK组、Kessler组和PARS组的平均末端间隙分别为3.68±1.08 mm、5.70±0.89 mm和7.59±1.26 mm。LBMK组的平均间隙明显小于其他组(p < 0.01)。LBMK组的最大破坏载荷最高,为732.8±138 N,高于其他组(p < 0.01)。

结论

LBMK缝合的生物力学强度明显大于Kessler和PARS。LBMK组间隙减小表明其对术后早期康复期间可能出现的间隙形成具有更强的抵抗力。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验