Deichsel Adrian, Rolf Jana, Raschke Michael J, Milstrey Alexander, Klimek Matthias, Peez Christian, Herbst Elmar, Kittl Christoph
Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Dec 13;12(12):23259671241300520. doi: 10.1177/23259671241300520. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Several types of suture anchors, which differ in their working principles, are available for fixation of ligamentous structures in knee surgery. How the choice of a suture anchor type influences the biomechanical stability of ligament fixation is largely unknown.
To compare the biomechanical properties of different suture anchor designs regarding primary stability for tendon fixation and repair in medial collateral ligament (MCL) surgery.
Controlled laboratory study.
The primary stability of MCL fixation was assessed in a porcine model utilizing 1 of 3 suture anchor types: a 5.5-mm titanium suture anchor (TSA), a 2.8-mm all-suture anchor (ASA), or a 5.5-mm polyether ether ketone knotless suture anchor (KLSA). Primary stability was assessed using a uniaxial material testing machine. Cyclic loading at 50 N and 100 N was applied for 500 cycles each, followed by a load-to-failure test.
After 500 cycles at 50 N, the KLSA (2.4 ± 0.3 mm) showed significantly ( < .05) reduced elongation in comparison to the TSA (4.0 ± 0.9 mm) and ASA (3.6 ± 0.7 mm), and after 500 cycles at 100 N, the KLSA (6.5 ± 1.4 mm) again showed significantly ( < .05) reduced elongation in comparison to the TSA (11.0 ± 2.2 mm) and ASA (12.0 ± 3.6 mm). However, the KLSA (213 ± 27 N) showed a significantly ( < .05) inferior ultimate failure load in comparison to the TSA (300 ± 20 N) and ASA (348 ± 23 N). In comparison to the TSA (113.0 ± 11.0 N/mm) and ASA (113.6 ± 14.4 N/mm), the KLSA (150.7 ± 11.6 N/mm) displayed the highest stiffness ( < .05). No significant differences were observed regarding yield load.
KLSAs displayed significantly reduced elongation, at the cost of a reduced ultimate failure load, in comparison to TSAs and ASAs.
Surgeons should be aware that differences exist between different suture anchor types regarding their biomechanical stability. KLSAs may be favorable for fixation of peripheral ligaments in knee surgery.
在膝关节手术中,有几种工作原理不同的缝合锚钉可用于固定韧带结构。缝合锚钉类型的选择如何影响韧带固定的生物力学稳定性在很大程度上尚不清楚。
比较不同缝合锚钉设计在内侧副韧带(MCL)手术中用于肌腱固定和修复的初始稳定性的生物力学特性。
对照实验室研究。
在猪模型中使用三种缝合锚钉类型之一评估MCL固定的初始稳定性:5.5毫米钛合金缝合锚钉(TSA)、2.8毫米全缝合锚钉(ASA)或5.5毫米聚醚醚酮无结缝合锚钉(KLSA)。使用单轴材料试验机评估初始稳定性。分别以50 N和100 N的力进行500次循环加载,然后进行破坏载荷试验。
在50 N下进行500次循环后,与TSA(4.0±0.9毫米)和ASA(3.6±0.7毫米)相比,KLSA(2.4±0.3毫米)的伸长率显著降低(P<0.05);在100 N下进行500次循环后,与TSA(11.0±2.2毫米)和ASA(12.0±3.6毫米)相比,KLSA(6.5±1.4毫米)的伸长率再次显著降低(P<0.05)。然而,与TSA(300±20 N)和ASA(348±23 N)相比,KLSA(213±27 N)的极限破坏载荷显著较低(P<0.05)。与TSA(113.0±11.0 N/mm)和ASA(113.6±14.4 N/mm)相比,KLSA(150.7±11.6 N/mm)的刚度最高(P<0.05)。屈服载荷方面未观察到显著差异。
与TSA和ASA相比,KLSA的伸长率显著降低,代价是极限破坏载荷降低。
外科医生应意识到不同缝合锚钉类型在生物力学稳定性方面存在差异。KLSA可能有利于膝关节手术中外周韧带的固定。