Penas Patricia, Uriarte Jose Juan, Gorbeña Susana, Moreno-Calvete Maria Concepcion, Ridgway Priscilla, Iraurgi Ioseba
Department of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatment, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain.
Red de Salud Mental, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Basque Health Service, Bizkaia Mental Health Network, Bilbao, Spain.
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 30;11:595. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00595. eCollection 2020.
The aim of this study was to assess to what extent the recovery elements of the Recovery Enhancing Environment (REE) instrument measured the dimensions proposed by the CHIME framework, (Connectedness, Hope and optimism about future, Identity, Meaning in life and Empowerment dimensions), so as to evaluate personal recovery in people with severe mental illness.
Two processes were conducted. Firstly, five experts matched the elements of recovery evaluated by the REE items with the CHIME domains and subdomains. Then, the resulting structure from those experts agreement was analyzed with different confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) using responses to the recovery elements dimension of the REE of 312 mental health service users.
The percentage of agreements and the kappa coefficients were adequate taking into account the CHIME dimensions (κ = 0.57 to 0.69, total κ = 0.74); however, lower agreement was found at the subdimensions level. Some indexes of the CFA were acceptable for a second order factor analysis [ = 346.03, < 0.001, CFI= 0.931, RMSEA= 0.037 (0.028 to 0.046)] and the most adequate solution was obtained from the bi-factorial structure ( =233.19, =0.306, CFI= 0.993, RMSEA= 0.012 [0.000 to 0.027]).
Despite the subjective and complex nature of the personal recovery construct, the REE measure can be a valid instrument to verify the existing CHIME conceptual framework, since two of the models tested have resulted in adequate indexes and were also congruent with the theoretical framework and the statistical solution. Thus, REE can be used to obtain a global index of Personal Recovery dimension, and the five indicators proposed by the CHIME framework.
本研究旨在评估康复促进环境(REE)工具的康复要素在多大程度上测量了CHIME框架提出的维度(联系、对未来的希望和乐观、身份认同、生活意义和赋权维度),以便评估重度精神疾病患者的个人康复情况。
进行了两个过程。首先,五名专家将REE项目评估的康复要素与CHIME领域和子领域进行匹配。然后,使用312名心理健康服务使用者对REE康复要素维度的回答,通过不同的验证性因素分析(CFA)对专家达成一致的结果结构进行分析。
考虑到CHIME维度,一致性百分比和kappa系数是合适的(κ = 0.57至0.69,总κ = 0.74);然而,在子维度层面发现的一致性较低。对于二阶因素分析,CFA的一些指标是可以接受的[χ² = 346.03,p < 0.001,CFI = 0.931,RMSEA = 0.037(0.028至0.046)],并且从双因素结构中获得了最合适的解决方案(χ² = 233.19,p = 0.306,CFI = 0.993,RMSEA = 0.012 [0.000至0.027])。
尽管个人康复结构具有主观性和复杂性,但REE测量可以成为验证现有CHIME概念框架的有效工具,因为所测试的两个模型都产生了合适的指标,并且也与理论框架和统计解决方案一致。因此,REE可用于获得个人康复维度的全局指标以及CHIME框架提出的五个指标。