Suppr超能文献

加州不同保险类型下的产妇护理中女性的代理体验和尊重感。

Women's experience of agency and respect in maternity care by type of insurance in California.

机构信息

Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America.

National Partnership for Women & Families, Washington, DC, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Jul 27;15(7):e0235262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235262. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Public insurance (Medicaid) covered 42% of all U.S. births in 2018. This paper describes and analyzes the self-reported experiences of women with Medicaid versus commercial insurance relating to autonomy, control and respectful treatment in maternity care.

METHODS

The sampling frame for the Listening to Mothers in California survey was drawn from 2016 California birth certificate files. The 30-minute survey had a 55% response rate. A secondary multivariable analysis of results from the survey included 2,318 women with commercial private insurance (1,087) or public (Medi-Cal) (1,231) coverage. Results were weighted and were representative of all births in 2016 in California. The multivariable analysis of variables related to maternal agency included engagement in decision making regarding interventions such as vaginal birth after cesarean and episiotomy, feeling pressured to have interventions and sense of fair treatment. We examined their relationship to insurance status adjusted for maternal age, race/ethnicity, education, nativity and attitude toward birth as well as type of prenatal provider, type of birth attendant and pregnancy complications.

RESULTS

Women with Medi-Cal had a demographic profile distinct from those with commercial insurance. In multivariable analysis, women with Medi-Cal reported less control over their maternity care experience than women with commercial insurance, including less choice of prenatal provider (AOR 1.61 95%C.I. 1.20, 2.17), or a vaginal birth after cesarean (AOR 2.93 95%C.I. 1.49, 5.73). Mothers on Medi-Cal were also less likely to be consulted before experiencing an episiotomy (AOR 0.30 95%C.I. 0.09, 0.94). They were more likely to report feeling pressure to have a primary cesarean (AOR 2.54 95%C.I. 1.55, 4.16) and less likely to be encouraged by staff to make their own decisions (AOR 0.63 95%C.I. 0.47, 0.85).

CONCLUSIONS

Childbearing women with public insurance in California clearly and consistently reported less opportunity to choose their care than women with private insurance. These inequities are a call to action for increased accountability and quality improvement relating to care of the many childbearing women with Medicaid coverage.

摘要

目的

2018 年,公共保险(医疗补助)覆盖了美国所有分娩的 42%。本文描述并分析了有医疗补助和商业保险的女性在分娩护理方面自主权、控制感和尊重待遇方面的自我报告经历。

方法

加利福尼亚倾听母亲调查的抽样框架取自 2016 年加利福尼亚州出生证明档案。该 30 分钟的调查回复率为 55%。对调查结果的二次多变量分析包括 2318 名有商业私人保险(1087 名)或公共(Medi-Cal)(1231 名)保险的女性。结果经过加权处理,代表了 2016 年加利福尼亚州所有分娩的情况。与产妇代理相关的变量的多变量分析包括参与有关阴道分娩后剖宫产和会阴切开术等干预措施的决策、感到有压力接受干预以及公平待遇感。我们检查了它们与保险状况的关系,保险状况调整了产妇年龄、种族/民族、教育、出生地以及对分娩的态度以及产前提供者类型、分娩人员类型和妊娠并发症。

结果

有医疗补助的女性的人口统计学特征与有商业保险的女性明显不同。在多变量分析中,有医疗补助的女性报告在其分娩经历中控制感低于有商业保险的女性,包括选择产前提供者的机会较少(AOR 1.61,95%CI 1.20,2.17),或阴道分娩后剖宫产(AOR 2.93,95%CI 1.49,5.73)。有 Medi-Cal 的母亲在经历会阴切开术之前也不太可能被咨询(AOR 0.30,95%CI 0.09,0.94)。她们更有可能报告感到有压力要进行主要剖宫产(AOR 2.54,95%CI 1.55,4.16),而不太可能受到工作人员的鼓励做出自己的决定(AOR 0.63,95%CI 0.47,0.85)。

结论

加利福尼亚州有公共保险的产妇明显且一致地报告说,与有私人保险的产妇相比,她们选择护理的机会较少。这些不平等现象呼吁采取行动,提高与许多有医疗补助的产妇护理相关的问责制和质量改进。

相似文献

1
Women's experience of agency and respect in maternity care by type of insurance in California.
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 27;15(7):e0235262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235262. eCollection 2020.
2
Maternal factors influencing late entry into prenatal care: a stratified analysis by race or ethnicity and insurance status.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Oct;32(20):3336-3342. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1463366. Epub 2018 Apr 22.
3
Selection of Higher Risk Pregnancies into Veterans Health Administration Programs: Discoveries from Linked Department of Veterans Affairs and California Birth Data.
Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec;53 Suppl 3(Suppl Suppl 3):5260-5284. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13041. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
4
Intrapartum Care and Experiences of Women with Midwives Versus Obstetricians in the Listening to Mothers in California Survey.
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020 Jan;65(1):45-55. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13027. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
7
Disparities in Pediatric Provider Availability by Insurance Type After the ACA in California.
Acad Pediatr. 2019 Apr;19(3):325-332. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
9
The role of doulas in respectful care for communities of color and Medicaid recipients.
Birth. 2022 Dec;49(4):823-832. doi: 10.1111/birt.12655. Epub 2022 Jun 2.

引用本文的文献

2
Factors associated with clinician adherence to guidelines for postpartum care: results from a California survey.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Mar 13;25(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07362-0.
4
Planned Home Births in the United States Have Outcomes Comparable to Planned Birth Center Births for Low-Risk Birthing Individuals.
Med Care. 2024 Dec 1;62(12):820-829. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000002074. Epub 2024 Nov 8.
7
Challenges and Opportunities for Clinician Implicit Bias Training: Insights from Perinatal Care Stakeholders.
Health Equity. 2023 Sep 13;7(1):506-519. doi: 10.1089/heq.2023.0126. eCollection 2023.
8
Approaches and geographical locations of respectful maternity care research: A scoping review.
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 24;18(8):e0290434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290434. eCollection 2023.
10
Maternity Care at the Intersections of Language, Ethnicity, and Immigration Status: A Qualitative Study.
Womens Health Issues. 2023 Nov-Dec;33(6):618-625. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2023.04.004. Epub 2023 May 25.

本文引用的文献

2
An integrative review: maternal engagement in the neonatal intensive care unit and health outcomes for U.S.-born preterm infants and their parents.
AIMS Public Health. 2019 May 5;6(2):160-183. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2019.2.160. eCollection 2019.
4
Correlates of Trial of Labor and Vaginal Birth After Cesarean in the United States.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019 Sep;28(9):1302-1312. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7270. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
5
Births: Final Data for 2017.
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2018 Nov;67(8):1-50.
7
Hospital variation in utilization and success of trial of labor after a prior cesarean.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;220(1):98.e1-98.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.034. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
9
Differences in caesarean rates across women's socio-economic status by diverse obstetric indications: Cross-sectional study.
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2018 Jul;32(4):309-317. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12484. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
10
Keeping it together and falling apart: Women's dynamic experience of birth.
Midwifery. 2018 Mar;58:130-136. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.12.006. Epub 2017 Dec 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验