• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与剖宫产术后阴道分娩相关的人口统计学、社会经济学、卫生系统和地理因素:对 2017 年美国出生证明数据的分析。

Demographic, Socioeconomic, Health Systems, and Geographic Factors Associated with Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: An Analysis of 2017 U.S. Birth Certificate Data.

机构信息

Yale University School of Nursing, 400 West Campus Drive, Orange, CT, 06477, USA.

出版信息

Matern Child Health J. 2021 Jul;25(7):1069-1080. doi: 10.1007/s10995-020-03066-3. Epub 2020 Nov 17.

DOI:10.1007/s10995-020-03066-3
PMID:33201453
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8126565/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In order to better understand the current rates of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) in the United States, 2017 U.S. birth certificate data were used to examine sociodemographic and geographic factors associated with the outcome of a VBAC.

METHODS

The 2017 Natality Limited Geography Dataset and block sequential logistic regression were used to examine sociodemographic and geographic factors associated with subsequent births in 2017 in the United States to women with a history of 1 or 2 cesareans (N = 540,711).

RESULTS

The adjusted odds of VBAC were 6% higher for Black women (1.06; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.08) and 18% higher for American Indian/Alaska Native women (aOR 1.18; 95% CI: 1.10, 1.27) relative to white women. Asian/Pacific Islander women were 9% less likely to have a VBAC (aOR 0.91; 95% CI: 0.88, 0.94) than similar white women with a history of cesarean delivery. Latina women had a 10% less likelihood of a VBAC (aOR 0.90; 95% CI: 0.88, 0.92) when compared with non-Latina women. Women with a high school education (aOR 0.85; 95% CI: 0.83, 0.88) or some college (aOR 0.85; 95% CI: 0.84, 0.87) were less likely to have a VBAC than women educated at a baccalaureate level or higher. Women whose births were paid for by Medicaid had a 5% increased likelihood of VBAC over women with private insurance (aOR 1.05, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.07). Women who self-pay have twice the likelihood of VBAC (aOR 1.99; 95% CI: 1.92, 2.07) compared to women with private insurance. The adjusted odds of VBAC were lowest for women giving birth in Southern states (aOR 0.72; 95% CI: 0.71, 0.74) and highest for women giving birth in the Midwest (aOR 1.19; 95% CI: 1.16, 1.22) relative to women in the Northeastern U.S. Thirteen percent (13%) of women who had a VBAC had a certified nurse-midwife (CNM) birth attendant, which is 44% higher than the national CNM-attended birth rate.

CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE

Significant variation exists in VBAC rates based on a number of sociodemographic and geographic factors, likely reflecting disparities in access to vaginal birth after cesarean and differences in preference regarding mode of birth after cesarean. Further research is recommended to better understand and address these disparities to improve maternity care.

摘要

目的

为了更好地了解美国目前剖宫产术后阴道分娩(VBAC)的比率,利用 2017 年美国出生证明数据,对与 VBAC 结局相关的社会人口学和地理因素进行了研究。

方法

利用 2017 年有限地理数据集和分块序贯逻辑回归,对 2017 年在美国有 1 次或 2 次剖宫产史的妇女的后续分娩的社会人口学和地理因素进行了研究(N=540711)。

结果

与白人妇女相比,黑人妇女(调整后的比值比[aOR]为 1.06;95%置信区间[CI]:1.04,1.08)和美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民妇女(aOR 为 1.18;95%CI:1.10,1.27)的 VBAC 几率高 6%和 18%。与有剖宫产史的白人妇女相比,亚裔/太平洋岛民妇女的 VBAC 几率低 9%(aOR 为 0.91;95%CI:0.88,0.94)。与非拉丁裔妇女相比,拉丁裔妇女的 VBAC 几率低 10%(aOR 为 0.90;95%CI:0.88,0.92)。接受过高中(aOR 为 0.85;95%CI:0.83,0.88)或大专(aOR 为 0.85;95%CI:0.84,0.87)教育的妇女比接受过本科及以上教育的妇女进行 VBAC 的可能性低。与有私人保险的妇女相比,由医疗补助支付分娩费用的妇女 VBAC 的可能性增加 5%(aOR 为 1.05;95%CI:1.03,1.07)。与有私人保险的妇女相比,自费的妇女 VBAC 的可能性增加了一倍(aOR 为 1.99;95%CI:1.92,2.07)。与美国东北部的妇女相比,南部各州(aOR 为 0.72;95%CI:0.71,0.74)出生的妇女 VBAC 的调整几率最低,中西部(aOR 为 1.19;95%CI:1.16,1.22)出生的妇女 VBAC 的调整几率最高。13%(13%)的 VBAC 妇女有认证的注册助产士(CNM)分娩助手,这比全国 CNM 分娩率高 44%。

实践结论

VBAC 率存在显著差异,这与许多社会人口学和地理因素有关,可能反映了在获得剖宫产术后阴道分娩方面的差异以及对剖宫产术后分娩方式的偏好差异。建议进一步研究,以更好地了解和解决这些差异,以改善产妇护理。

相似文献

1
Demographic, Socioeconomic, Health Systems, and Geographic Factors Associated with Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: An Analysis of 2017 U.S. Birth Certificate Data.与剖宫产术后阴道分娩相关的人口统计学、社会经济学、卫生系统和地理因素:对 2017 年美国出生证明数据的分析。
Matern Child Health J. 2021 Jul;25(7):1069-1080. doi: 10.1007/s10995-020-03066-3. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
2
Variation in Vaginal Birth After Cesarean by Maternal Race and Detailed Ethnicity.剖宫产术后经阴道分娩率在不同产妇种族及详细族裔间的差异
Matern Child Health J. 2016 Jun;20(6):1114-23. doi: 10.1007/s10995-015-1897-5.
3
Planned mode of delivery after previous cesarean section and short-term maternal and perinatal outcomes: A population-based record linkage cohort study in Scotland.既往剖宫产术后计划性分娩方式与近期母婴围生结局的关系:苏格兰基于人群的病历关联队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2019 Sep 24;16(9):e1002913. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002913. eCollection 2019 Sep.
4
Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Likelihood of Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery.剖宫产术后阴道分娩可能性的种族和民族差异。
Birth. 2015 Sep;42(3):249-53. doi: 10.1111/birt.12174. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
5
Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights.剖宫产术后阴道分娩:新见解
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2010 Mar(191):1-397.
6
Association Between Utilization of Digital Prenatal Services and Vaginal Birth After Cesarean.利用数字化产前服务与剖宫产术后阴道分娩的关系。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2023 Mar;68(2):255-264. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13467. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
7
Correlates of Trial of Labor and Vaginal Birth After Cesarean in the United States.美国剖宫产术后试产和阴道分娩的相关因素。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019 Sep;28(9):1302-1312. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7270. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
8
Neonatal mortality risk for repeat cesarean compared to vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) deliveries in the United States, 1998-2002 birth cohorts.美国 1998-2002 年出生队列中,再次剖宫产与剖宫产后阴道分娩(VBAC)新生儿死亡率的比较。
Matern Child Health J. 2010 Mar;14(2):147-54. doi: 10.1007/s10995-009-0551-5.
9
Association between vaginal birth after cesarean delivery and primary cesarean delivery rates.剖宫产术后阴道分娩与初次剖宫产率的关系。
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Nov;122(5):1010-1017. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a91e0f.
10
Trends in cesarean birth and vaginal birth after previous cesarean, 1991-99.1991 - 1999年剖宫产及既往剖宫产术后阴道分娩的趋势
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2001 Dec 27;49(13):1-16.

引用本文的文献

1
"I was able to take it back": Seeking VBAC after experiencing dehumanizing maternity care in a primary cesarean.“我能够挽回局面”:在经历了首次剖宫产中不人道的孕产护理后寻求剖宫产后阴道分娩。
SSM Qual Res Health. 2023 Dec;4. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2023.100339. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
2
How can obstetrical anaesthesiologists help in reducing the rate of caesarean delivery?产科麻醉医生如何帮助降低剖宫产率?
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2022;54(4):339-340. doi: 10.5114/ait.2022.121044.
3
Racial Disparities in Respectful Maternity Care During Pregnancy and Birth After Cesarean in Rural United States.美国农村地区剖宫产术后妊娠和分娩期间尊重产妇护理的种族差异。
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2023 Jan;52(1):36-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2022.10.001. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
4
Inequities in quality perinatal care in the United States during pregnancy and birth after cesarean.美国剖宫产术后妊娠和分娩期间围产期护理质量的不平等现象。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 22;17(9):e0274790. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274790. eCollection 2022.
5
Factors associated with labor after cesarean in a prospective cohort.与剖宫产术后分娩相关的因素:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Birth. 2022 Dec;49(4):833-842. doi: 10.1111/birt.12656. Epub 2022 May 24.
6
Experiences of Quality Perinatal Care During the US COVID-19 Pandemic.美国 COVID-19 大流行期间的优质围产期护理体验。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2021 Sep;66(5):579-588. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13269. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
7
"I had to fight for my VBAC": A mixed methods exploration of women's experiences of pregnancy and vaginal birth after cesarean in the United States.“我必须争取 VBAC(阴道分娩):对美国妇女剖腹产产后阴道分娩经历的混合方法探索。”
Birth. 2021 Jun;48(2):164-177. doi: 10.1111/birt.12513. Epub 2020 Dec 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Recent Trends in Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery: United States, 2016-2018.近期剖宫产术后阴道分娩趋势:美国,2016-2018 年。
NCHS Data Brief. 2020 Mar(359):1-8.
2
Women's Perceptions of Barriers and Facilitators to Vaginal Birth After Cesarean in the United States: An Integrative Review.美国女性对剖宫产后阴道分娩的障碍和促进因素的看法:综合评价。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020 May;65(3):349-361. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13083. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
3
Hospital contribution to variation in rates of vaginal birth after cesarean.医院对剖宫产后阴道分娩率差异的贡献。
J Perinatol. 2019 Jul;39(7):904-910. doi: 10.1038/s41372-019-0373-2. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
4
Correlates of Trial of Labor and Vaginal Birth After Cesarean in the United States.美国剖宫产术后试产和阴道分娩的相关因素。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019 Sep;28(9):1302-1312. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7270. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
5
Births: Final Data for 2017.出生情况:2017年最终数据。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2018 Nov;67(8):1-50.
6
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 205: Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery.美国妇产科医师学会实践公告第 205 号:剖宫产后的阴道分娩。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;133(2):e110-e127. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003078.
7
Women's preference for vaginal birth after a first delivery by cesarean.产妇头胎行剖宫产术后对阴道分娩的偏好。
Birth. 2019 Mar;46(1):51-60. doi: 10.1111/birt.12386. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
8
Mapping integration of midwives across the United States: Impact on access, equity, and outcomes.美国助产士的分布整合:对可及性、公平性和结果的影响。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 21;13(2):e0192523. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192523. eCollection 2018.
9
Practice Bulletin No. 184: Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery.实践公告第 184 号:剖宫产术后阴道分娩。
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;130(5):e217-e233. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002398.
10
Are CNM-Attended Births in Texas Hospitals Underreported?德克萨斯州医院中由认证护士助产士接生的情况是否报告不足?
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2017 Sep;62(5):614-619. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12654. Epub 2017 Sep 13.