Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge; Division of Primary Care and Population Health, University of Southampton, Southampton.
Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Aug 27;70(698):e668-e675. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X710945. Print 2020 Sep.
There is little evidence on the impact of national pressures on primary care provision for type 2 diabetes from the perspectives of patients, their GPs, and nurses.
To explore experiences of primary care provision for people with type 2 diabetes and their respective GPs and nurses.
A qualitative primary care interview study in the East of England.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted, between August 2017 and August 2018, with people who have type 2 diabetes along with their respective GPs and nurses. Purposive sampling was used to select for heterogeneity in glycaemic control and previous healthcare experiences. Interviews were audio-recorded and analysed thematically. The consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research were followed.
The authors interviewed 24 patients and 15 GPs and nurses, identifying a changing landscape of diabetes provision owing to burgeoning pressures that were presented repeatedly. Patient responders wanted GP-delivered care with continuity. They saw GPs as experts best placed to support them in managing diabetes, but were increasingly receiving nurse-led care. Nurses reported providing most of the in-person care, while GPs remained accountable but increasingly distanced from face-to-face diabetes care provision. A reluctant acknowledgement surfaced among GPs, nurses, and their patients that only minimum care standards could be maintained, with aspirations for high-quality provision unlikely to be met.
Type 2 diabetes is a tracer condition that reflects many aspects of primary care. Efforts to manage pressures have not been perceived favourably by patients and providers, despite some benefits. Reframing expectations of care, by communicating solutions to both patients and providers so that they are understood, managed, and realistic, may be one way forward.
从患者、全科医生和护士的角度来看,关于国家压力对 2 型糖尿病初级保健服务的影响,几乎没有证据。
探讨 2 型糖尿病患者及其全科医生和护士的初级保健服务体验。
在英格兰东部进行的定性初级保健访谈研究。
2017 年 8 月至 2018 年 8 月期间,对 2 型糖尿病患者及其各自的全科医生和护士进行了半结构化访谈。采用目的抽样法,选择血糖控制和以往医疗保健经验存在异质性的患者。对访谈进行了录音,并进行了主题分析。遵循了用于报告定性研究的综合标准。
作者采访了 24 名患者和 15 名全科医生和护士,发现由于不断增加的压力,糖尿病的提供情况发生了变化,这些压力反复出现。患者受访者希望获得由全科医生提供的具有连续性的护理。他们认为全科医生是最适合支持他们管理糖尿病的专家,但他们越来越多地接受护士主导的护理。护士报告提供了大部分的面对面护理,而全科医生虽然仍承担责任,但越来越远离面对面的糖尿病护理提供。全科医生、护士和他们的患者都不情愿地承认,只能维持最低的护理标准,而不可能达到高质量的护理提供。
2 型糖尿病是一种追踪疾病,反映了初级保健的许多方面。尽管取得了一些成效,但管理压力的努力并未得到患者和提供者的好评。通过向患者和提供者传达解决方案,重新调整对护理的期望,使他们理解、管理和实现期望,可能是一种前进的方式。