• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

锦上添花效应:由好奇心激发的探索行为

The Gilding-the-Lily Effect: Exploratory Behavior Energized by Curiosity.

作者信息

Shen Mowei, Liu Pengpeng, Li Xinyu, Zhou Jifan, Chen Hui

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

Department of Psychology, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 3;11:1381. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01381. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01381
PMID:32719635
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7350549/
Abstract

The widespread metaphor "to gild the lily" suggests that people usually engage in superfluous behaviors. Understanding the cognitive mechanism underlying superfluous behaviors helps individuals to reduce possible waste and even disasters incurred by unnecessary actions. Here, we assumed that curiosity for new information partly pushes people to make needless efforts. This hypothesis was tested through three experiments. In three experiments, we found that when participants knew that expending more efforts than task requirements brought no better results, they still exerted various exploratory activities to fulfill curiosity. These results imply that the impulsion to satisfy the desire for information could partly drive individuals to indulge in unnecessary activities over mission demands. Present research improves the comprehension of irrational superfluous behavior and provides directions to reduce loss and waste caused by gilding the lily.

摘要

广为流传的隐喻“给百合花镀金”表明人们通常会做出多余的行为。了解多余行为背后的认知机制有助于个人减少不必要行动可能带来的浪费甚至灾难。在此,我们假设对新信息的好奇心在一定程度上促使人们做出不必要的努力。这一假设通过三个实验进行了检验。在三个实验中,我们发现,当参与者知道付出超过任务要求的更多努力不会带来更好的结果时,他们仍然会进行各种探索活动以满足好奇心。这些结果意味着,满足信息欲望的冲动在一定程度上可能会驱使个人在任务需求之外沉迷于不必要的活动。当前的研究增进了对非理性多余行为的理解,并为减少“给百合花镀金”所造成的损失和浪费提供了方向。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1195/7350549/45673169558a/fpsyg-11-01381-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1195/7350549/2c2af6865c3b/fpsyg-11-01381-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1195/7350549/2b68ef252eb3/fpsyg-11-01381-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1195/7350549/9b756a983d78/fpsyg-11-01381-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1195/7350549/af84f611d7c5/fpsyg-11-01381-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1195/7350549/5a990028c10a/fpsyg-11-01381-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1195/7350549/33ff7e39ee9d/fpsyg-11-01381-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1195/7350549/32a802527750/fpsyg-11-01381-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1195/7350549/6dd743e1d62e/fpsyg-11-01381-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1195/7350549/eed117e0b9a6/fpsyg-11-01381-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1195/7350549/a9941be7db1e/fpsyg-11-01381-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1195/7350549/45673169558a/fpsyg-11-01381-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1195/7350549/2c2af6865c3b/fpsyg-11-01381-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1195/7350549/2b68ef252eb3/fpsyg-11-01381-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1195/7350549/9b756a983d78/fpsyg-11-01381-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1195/7350549/af84f611d7c5/fpsyg-11-01381-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1195/7350549/5a990028c10a/fpsyg-11-01381-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1195/7350549/33ff7e39ee9d/fpsyg-11-01381-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1195/7350549/32a802527750/fpsyg-11-01381-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1195/7350549/6dd743e1d62e/fpsyg-11-01381-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1195/7350549/eed117e0b9a6/fpsyg-11-01381-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1195/7350549/a9941be7db1e/fpsyg-11-01381-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1195/7350549/45673169558a/fpsyg-11-01381-g011.jpg

相似文献

1
The Gilding-the-Lily Effect: Exploratory Behavior Energized by Curiosity.锦上添花效应:由好奇心激发的探索行为
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 3;11:1381. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01381. eCollection 2020.
2
Unperceived, the impact of information gap design plateware on food waste.信息差距设计餐具对食物浪费的影响未被察觉。
Appetite. 2024 Aug 1;199:107388. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2024.107388. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
3
The Pandora Effect: The Power and Peril of Curiosity.潘多拉效应:好奇心的力量与危险
Psychol Sci. 2016 May;27(5):659-66. doi: 10.1177/0956797616631733. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
4
Towards Conceptualizing Language Learning Curiosity in SLA: An Empirical Study.二语习得中语言学习好奇心的概念化:一项实证研究
J Psycholinguist Res. 2019 Apr;48(2):333-351. doi: 10.1007/s10936-018-9606-3.
5
The latent structure of trait curiosity: evidence for interest and deprivation curiosity dimensions.特质好奇心的潜在结构:兴趣与匮乏好奇心维度的证据。
J Pers Assess. 2006 Jun;86(3):318-28. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8603_07.
6
Curiosity about people: the development of a social curiosity measure in adults.对人的好奇心:成人社交好奇心量表的编制
J Pers Assess. 2006 Dec;87(3):305-16. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8703_11.
7
Curiosity protects against interpersonal aggression: cross-sectional, daily process, and behavioral evidence.好奇心能预防人际侵犯:横断面、日常过程和行为证据。
J Pers. 2013 Feb;81(1):87-102. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00783.x. Epub 2013 Jan 2.
8
Eye movements reveal epistemic curiosity in human observers.眼动揭示了人类观察者的认知好奇心。
Vision Res. 2015 Dec;117:81-90. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.10.009. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
9
Escaping the dark side of curiosity.逃离好奇心的阴暗面。
Am J Psychoanal. 2002 Jun;62(2):185-99. doi: 10.1023/a:1015133312320.
10
Induction and Relief of Curiosity Elicit Parietal and Frontal Activity.好奇心的诱发和缓解会引起顶叶和额叶的活动。
J Neurosci. 2018 Mar 7;38(10):2579-2588. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2816-17.2018. Epub 2018 Feb 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Examination of the impact of curiosity and fatigue on brain condition.探究好奇心和疲劳对大脑状况的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 15;15(1):13005. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97796-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Asking the right questions about the psychology of human inquiry: Nine open challenges.探讨人类探究心理学的正确问题:九大开放性挑战。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Oct;26(5):1548-1587. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1470-5.
2
The Pandora Effect: The Power and Peril of Curiosity.潘多拉效应:好奇心的力量与危险
Psychol Sci. 2016 May;27(5):659-66. doi: 10.1177/0956797616631733. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
3
Why boredom is anything but boring.为何无聊绝不是无趣之事。
Nature. 2016 Jan 14;529(7585):146-8. doi: 10.1038/529146a.
4
Trust in automation: integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust.对自动化的信任:整合关于影响信任因素的实证证据。
Hum Factors. 2015 May;57(3):407-34. doi: 10.1177/0018720814547570. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
5
States of curiosity modulate hippocampus-dependent learning via the dopaminergic circuit.好奇状态通过多巴胺能回路调节海马体依赖的学习。
Neuron. 2014 Oct 22;84(2):486-96. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.08.060. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
6
Attribution theory and research.归因理论与研究。
Annu Rev Psychol. 1980;31:457-501. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.002325.
7
The wick in the candle of learning: epistemic curiosity activates reward circuitry and enhances memory.学习之烛的灯芯:认知好奇心激活奖赏回路并增强记忆。
Psychol Sci. 2009 Aug;20(8):963-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02402.x. Epub 2009 Jul 8.
8
The trouble with overconfidence.过度自信的问题。
Psychol Rev. 2008 Apr;115(2):502-17. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.502.
9
G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.G*Power 3:一款适用于社会科学、行为科学和生物医学科学的灵活的统计功效分析程序。
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.
10
Attribution of beliefs by 13-month-old infants.13个月大婴儿对信念的归因。
Psychol Sci. 2007 Jul;18(7):580-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01943.x.