• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对自动化的信任:整合关于影响信任因素的实证证据。

Trust in automation: integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust.

作者信息

Hoff Kevin Anthony, Bashir Masooda

机构信息

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

出版信息

Hum Factors. 2015 May;57(3):407-34. doi: 10.1177/0018720814547570. Epub 2014 Sep 2.

DOI:10.1177/0018720814547570
PMID:25875432
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We systematically review recent empirical research on factors that influence trust in automation to present a three-layered trust model that synthesizes existing knowledge.

BACKGROUND

Much of the existing research on factors that guide human-automation interaction is centered around trust, a variable that often determines the willingness of human operators to rely on automation. Studies have utilized a variety of different automated systems in diverse experimental paradigms to identify factors that impact operators' trust.

METHOD

We performed a systematic review of empirical research on trust in automation from January 2002 to June 2013. Papers were deemed eligible only if they reported the results of a human-subjects experiment in which humans interacted with an automated system in order to achieve a goal. Additionally, a relationship between trust (or a trust-related behavior) and another variable had to be measured. All together, 101 total papers, containing 127 eligible studies, were included in the review.

RESULTS

Our analysis revealed three layers of variability in human-automation trust (dispositional trust, situational trust, and learned trust), which we organize into a model. We propose design recommendations for creating trustworthy automation and identify environmental conditions that can affect the strength of the relationship between trust and reliance. Future research directions are also discussed for each layer of trust.

CONCLUSION

Our three-layered trust model provides a new lens for conceptualizing the variability of trust in automation. Its structure can be applied to help guide future research and develop training interventions and design procedures that encourage appropriate trust.

摘要

目的

我们系统地回顾了近期关于影响对自动化信任的因素的实证研究,以呈现一个综合现有知识的三层信任模型。

背景

现有的许多关于指导人机自动化交互因素的研究都围绕信任展开,信任这一变量常常决定人类操作员依赖自动化的意愿。研究在各种不同的实验范式中使用了多种不同的自动化系统,以确定影响操作员信任的因素。

方法

我们对2002年1月至2013年6月间关于自动化信任的实证研究进行了系统回顾。只有那些报告了人类受试者实验结果的论文才被视为合格,在这些实验中,人类与自动化系统进行交互以实现一个目标。此外,必须测量信任(或与信任相关的行为)与另一个变量之间的关系。该综述共纳入了101篇论文,包含127项合格研究。

结果

我们的分析揭示了人机自动化信任中的三层变异性(性格信任、情境信任和习得信任),我们将其组织成一个模型。我们提出了创建可信自动化的设计建议,并确定了可能影响信任与依赖之间关系强度的环境条件。还针对每一层信任讨论了未来的研究方向。

结论

我们的三层信任模型为概念化自动化信任的变异性提供了一个新视角。其结构可用于帮助指导未来的研究,并开发鼓励适当信任的培训干预措施和设计程序。

相似文献

1
Trust in automation: integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust.对自动化的信任:整合关于影响信任因素的实证证据。
Hum Factors. 2015 May;57(3):407-34. doi: 10.1177/0018720814547570. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
2
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
3
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
4
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
5
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
6
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
7
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.成年自闭症患者的就业生活经历:系统检索与综述
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec.
8
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer.促进癌症患者及康复者进行习惯性锻炼的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 19;9(9):CD010192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010192.pub3.
9
Factors that influence the provision of intrapartum and postnatal care by skilled birth attendants in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响低收入和中等收入国家熟练助产士提供产时和产后护理的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 17;11(11):CD011558. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011558.pub2.
10
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.

引用本文的文献

1
Promoting trust and intention to adopt health information generated by ChatGPT among healthcare customers: An empirical study.促进医疗保健客户对ChatGPT生成的健康信息的信任和采用意愿:一项实证研究。
Digit Health. 2025 Aug 28;11:20552076251374121. doi: 10.1177/20552076251374121. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Train your robot in AR: insights and challenges for humans and robots in continual teaching and learning.在增强现实中训练你的机器人:持续教学与学习中人类和机器人面临的见解与挑战。
Front Robot AI. 2025 Aug 13;12:1605652. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2025.1605652. eCollection 2025.
3
Digital product success under the microscope: When artificial intelligence in projects helps - and when it hurts.
显微镜下的数字产品成功:项目中的人工智能何时助力——何时造成损害。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 29;20(8):e0331229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331229. eCollection 2025.
4
The Cognitive Cost of AI: How AI Anxiety and Attitudes Influence Decision Fatigue in Daily Technology Use.人工智能的认知成本:人工智能焦虑与态度如何影响日常技术使用中的决策疲劳
Ann Neurosci. 2025 Aug 20:09727531251359872. doi: 10.1177/09727531251359872.
5
A Conceptual Framework for User Trust in AI Biosensors: Integrating Cognition, Context, and Contrast.人工智能生物传感器用户信任的概念框架:整合认知、情境和对比
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Aug 2;25(15):4766. doi: 10.3390/s25154766.
6
Predicting Engagement With Conversational Agents in Mental Health Therapy by Examining the Role of Epistemic Trust, Personality, and Fear of Intimacy: Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey Study.通过审视认知信任、人格和亲密关系恐惧的作用预测心理健康治疗中与对话代理的互动:基于网络的横断面调查研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Jul 30;12:e70698. doi: 10.2196/70698.
7
Decision-making efficiency with aided information: the impact of automation reliability and task difficulty.借助信息时的决策效率:自动化可靠性和任务难度的影响
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025 Jul 30;10(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s41235-025-00659-w.
8
Building trust in the age of human-machine interaction: insights, challenges, and future directions.在人机交互时代建立信任:见解、挑战与未来方向。
Front Robot AI. 2025 Jul 14;12:1535082. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2025.1535082. eCollection 2025.
9
Multi-stakeholder perspective on responsible artificial intelligence and acceptability in education.多方利益相关者对教育领域负责任的人工智能及可接受性的看法。
NPJ Sci Learn. 2025 Jul 8;10(1):44. doi: 10.1038/s41539-025-00333-2.
10
Dissociable effects of fatigue on performance and metacognition from automatic target cuing in undersea threat detection.疲劳对水下威胁探测中自动目标提示的性能和元认知的可分离影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025 Jun 15;10(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s41235-025-00638-1.