• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术中MANTA闭合装置的评估:一项单中心观察性研究。

Assessment of the MANTA closure device in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a single-centre observational study.

作者信息

Halim J, Missault L, Lycke M, Van der Heyden J

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Sint-Jan Hospital, Bruges, Belgium.

出版信息

Neth Heart J. 2020 Dec;28(12):639-644. doi: 10.1007/s12471-020-01465-3.

DOI:10.1007/s12471-020-01465-3
PMID:32720122
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7683762/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The present study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the MANTA vascular closure device (VCD) (Teleflex, Morrisville, NC, USA) in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TF-TAVR).

BACKGROUND

To close the femoral artery in TF-TAVR a VCD is the treatment of choice. Data involving suture-based VCDs have been extensive. Although scarce, results on the MANTA device are promising. There is no consensus yet as to whether the MANTA device is associated with fewer access-site-related vascular/bleeding complications when compared to suture-based VCDs.

METHODS

In this prospective single-arm study, performed at a single centre, a total of 73 patients eligible for TF-TAVR were included and consecutively treated with the MANTA device.

RESULTS

Access-site-related vascular complications were seen in 13.7% of patients treated with the MANTA device. In this group of patients only minor vascular complications were observed. Access-site-related bleeding complications were rare (6.8%), and device failure was seen in 13.7% of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This single-centre study confirms that use of the MANTA device in TF-TAVR is feasible with an acceptable rate of access-site-related complications and no major vascular complications.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估MANTA血管闭合装置(VCD)(美国北卡罗来纳州莫里斯维尔市泰利福公司生产)在经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TF-TAVR)中的有效性和安全性。

背景

在TF-TAVR中,VCD是闭合股动脉的首选治疗方法。关于基于缝线的VCD的数据已经很广泛。虽然关于MANTA装置的数据很少,但结果很有前景。与基于缝线的VCD相比,MANTA装置是否与较少的与穿刺部位相关的血管/出血并发症相关,目前尚无共识。

方法

在单中心进行的这项前瞻性单臂研究中,共纳入73例符合TF-TAVR条件的患者,并连续使用MANTA装置进行治疗。

结果

使用MANTA装置治疗的患者中,13.7%出现了与穿刺部位相关的血管并发症。在这组患者中,仅观察到轻微的血管并发症。与穿刺部位相关的出血并发症很少见(6.8%),13.7%的患者出现了装置故障。

结论

这项单中心研究证实,在TF-TAVR中使用MANTA装置是可行的,与穿刺部位相关的并发症发生率可接受,且无重大血管并发症。

相似文献

1
Assessment of the MANTA closure device in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a single-centre observational study.经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术中MANTA闭合装置的评估:一项单中心观察性研究。
Neth Heart J. 2020 Dec;28(12):639-644. doi: 10.1007/s12471-020-01465-3.
2
Assessment of the MANTA closure device in real-life transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A single-centre observational study.评估 MANTA 封堵装置在真实世界经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术中的应用:一项单中心观察性研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Mar;103(4):650-659. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30969. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
3
Outcomes with plug-based versus suture-based vascular closure device after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经股动脉导管主动脉瓣置换术后基于封堵器与基于缝线的血管闭合装置的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Mar;101(4):817-827. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30597. Epub 2023 Feb 19.
4
Propensity-matched comparison of large-bore access closure in transcatheter aortic valve replacement using MANTA versus Perclose: A real-world experience.使用 MANTA 和 Perclose 进行经导管主动脉瓣置换术大口径入路闭合的倾向评分匹配比较:真实世界经验。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Sep;98(3):580-585. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29786. Epub 2021 May 29.
5
Comparison of a Pure Plug-Based Versus a Primary Suture-Based Vascular Closure Device Strategy for Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The CHOICE-CLOSURE Randomized Clinical Trial.经股动脉主动脉瓣置换术中纯封堵器与主缝合法血管闭合装置策略的比较:CHOICE-CLOSURE 随机临床试验。
Circulation. 2022 Jan 18;145(3):170-183. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.057856. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
6
Clinical outcomes of MANTA vs suture-based vascular closure devices after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: An updated meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后 MANTA 与缝线式血管闭合装置的临床结局:一项更新的荟萃分析。
Indian Heart J. 2023 Jan-Feb;75(1):59-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2023.01.007. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
7
Real-World Experience With a Large Bore Vascular Closure Device During TAVI Procedure: Features and Predictors of Access-Site Vascular Complications.经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)过程中使用大口径血管闭合装置的真实世界经验:血管穿刺部位并发症的特征及预测因素
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Feb 28;9:832242. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.832242. eCollection 2022.
8
Impact of percutaneous femoral arteriotomy closure using the MANTA device on vascular and bleeding complications after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经股动脉 MANTA 装置封堵术对经导管主动脉瓣置换术后血管和出血并发症的影响。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Nov 1;92(5):954-961. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27595. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
9
Use of the MANTA device to rescue failed pre-closure following transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.使用MANTA装置挽救经股动脉导管主动脉瓣植入术后预封堵失败的情况。
J Cardiol Cases. 2018 Dec 20;19(3):81-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jccase.2018.12.001. eCollection 2019 Mar.
10
Suture- or Plug-Based Large-Bore Arteriotomy Closure: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.缝线或塞子式大口径动脉切开术闭合:一项先导随机对照试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jan 25;14(2):149-157. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.09.052. Epub 2020 Dec 23.

引用本文的文献

1
[The MANTA Vascular Closure Device in transfemoral TAVI: a real-world cohort].经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术中的MANTA血管闭合装置:一项真实世界队列研究
REC Interv Cardiol. 2023 Jun 9;6(1):7-12. doi: 10.24875/RECIC.M23000380. eCollection 2024 Jan-Mar.
2
MANTA Versus Suture-based Closure Devices Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: An Updated Meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后MANTA与缝线闭合装置的比较:一项更新的荟萃分析。
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 Jun 30;1(5):100397. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100397. eCollection 2022 Sep-Oct.
3
Vascular Complications Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation, Using MANTA (Collagen Plug-Based) versus PROSTAR (Suture-Based), from a French Single-Center Retrospective Registry.来自法国单中心回顾性登记研究,比较使用MANTA(基于胶原塞)与PROSTAR(基于缝线)行经导管主动脉瓣植入术后的血管并发症
J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 23;12(20):6697. doi: 10.3390/jcm12206697.
4
Percutaneous VA-ECMO from Cannulation to Decannulation: Novel Use of a Vascular Closure Device in Pediatrics.经皮 VA-ECMO 置管至拔管:血管闭合装置在儿科中的新应用。
Pediatr Cardiol. 2023 Oct;44(7):1623-1628. doi: 10.1007/s00246-023-03222-w. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
5
Comparison of Suture-Based and Collagen-Based Vascular Closure Devices for Large Bore Arteriotomies-A Meta-Analysis of Bleeding and Vascular Outcomes.用于大口径动脉切开术的缝线型与胶原型血管闭合装置的比较——出血与血管结局的荟萃分析
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022 Sep 30;9(10):331. doi: 10.3390/jcdd9100331.
6
Comparison of MANTA vs ProGlide Vascular Closure Device and 30-Day Outcomes in Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中 MANTA 与 ProGlide 血管闭合装置的比较及 30 天结果。
Tex Heart Inst J. 2022 Sep 1;49(5). doi: 10.14503/THIJ-21-7650.
7
Incidence and Predictors of Access Site Vascular Complications Following Ultrasound-Guided MANTA Closure Deployment.超声引导 MANTA 封堵器置入后血管入路并发症的发生率及预测因素。
J Endovasc Ther. 2022 Aug;29(4):576-585. doi: 10.1177/15266028211059446. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
8
MANTA closure device shows promise in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement.MANTA封堵装置在经股动脉导管主动脉瓣置换术中显示出前景。
Neth Heart J. 2020 Dec;28(12):637-638. doi: 10.1007/s12471-020-01511-0. Epub 2020 Oct 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Insights From a Multidisciplinary Introduction of the MANTA Vascular Closure Device.多学科引入 MANTA 血管闭合装置的见解。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep 9;12(17):1730-1736. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.06.049.
2
Pivotal Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the MANTA Percutaneous Vascular Closure Device.评估 MANTA 经皮血管闭合装置安全性和有效性的关键临床研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jul;12(7):e007258. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.007258. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
3
Propensity-matched comparison of vascular closure devices after transcatheter aortic valve replacement using MANTA versus ProGlide.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后应用 MANTA 与 ProGlide 血管闭合装置的倾向性匹配比较。
EuroIntervention. 2019 Feb 8;14(15):e1558-e1565. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00769.
4
MANTA versus ProGlide vascular closure devices in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.Manta 与 ProGlide 血管闭合装置在经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣植入术中的比较。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Jul 15;263:29-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.04.065. Epub 2018 Apr 14.
5
Impact of percutaneous femoral arteriotomy closure using the MANTA device on vascular and bleeding complications after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经股动脉 MANTA 装置封堵术对经导管主动脉瓣置换术后血管和出血并发症的影响。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Nov 1;92(5):954-961. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27595. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
6
Percutaneous Plug-Based Arteriotomy Closure Device for Large-Bore Access: A Multicenter Prospective Study.经皮塞栓式动脉切开术闭合装置用于大口径血管入路:一项多中心前瞻性研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Mar 27;10(6):613-619. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.12.277.
7
A systematic review on the safety of Prostar XL versus ProGlide after TAVR and EVAR.关于经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)和腔内修复术(EVAR)后Prostar XL与ProGlide安全性的系统评价。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2017 Mar;18(2):145-150. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2016.11.004. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
8
The MANTA Vascular Closure Device: A Novel Device for Large-Bore Vessel Closure.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun 13;9(11):1195-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.03.010.
9
Outcomes after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a comparison of the randomized PARTNER (Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valves) trial with the NRCA (Nonrandomized Continued Access) registry.经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的结局:PARTNER(AoRTic TraNscathetER 瓣膜的放置)随机试验与 NRCA(非随机持续准入)注册的比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Nov;7(11):1245-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.05.033. Epub 2014 Nov 17.
10
Management of vascular access in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: part 1: basic anatomy, imaging, sheaths, wires, and access routes.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中血管通路的管理:第 1 部分:基本解剖结构、影像学、鞘管、导丝和入路。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jul;6(7):643-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.04.003.