MANTA closure device shows promise in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
作者信息
Vendrik J, Baan J
机构信息
Department of Cardiology, Heart Centre, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
出版信息
Neth Heart J. 2020 Dec;28(12):637-638. doi: 10.1007/s12471-020-01511-0. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
MANTA closure device shows promise in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement.MANTA封堵装置在经股动脉导管主动脉瓣置换术中显示出前景。
Neth Heart J. 2020 Dec;28(12):637-638. doi: 10.1007/s12471-020-01511-0. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
2
Assessment of the MANTA closure device in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a single-centre observational study.经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术中MANTA闭合装置的评估：一项单中心观察性研究。
Neth Heart J. 2020 Dec;28(12):639-644. doi: 10.1007/s12471-020-01465-3.
3
Early Outcomes After Percutaneous Closure of Access Site in Transfemoral Transcatheter Valve Implantation Using the Novel Vascular Closure Device Collagen Plug-Based MANTA.使用新型血管闭合装置胶原塞基 MANTA 经股动脉经导管瓣膜植入术后经皮闭合入路的早期结果。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Oct 15;124(8):1265-1271. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.07.030. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
4
Impact of percutaneous femoral arteriotomy closure using the MANTA device on vascular and bleeding complications after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经股动脉 MANTA 装置封堵术对经导管主动脉瓣置换术后血管和出血并发症的影响。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Nov 1;92(5):954-961. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27595. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
5
Pivotal Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the MANTA Percutaneous Vascular Closure Device.评估 MANTA 经皮血管闭合装置安全性和有效性的关键临床研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jul;12(7):e007258. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.007258. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
6
MANTA versus ProGlide vascular closure devices in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.Manta 与 ProGlide 血管闭合装置在经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣植入术中的比较。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Jul 15;263:29-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.04.065. Epub 2018 Apr 14.
7
Use of the MANTA device to rescue failed pre-closure following transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.使用MANTA装置挽救经股动脉导管主动脉瓣植入术后预封堵失败的情况。
J Cardiol Cases. 2018 Dec 20;19(3):81-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jccase.2018.12.001. eCollection 2019 Mar.
8
Propensity-matched comparison of vascular closure devices after transcatheter aortic valve replacement using MANTA versus ProGlide.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后应用 MANTA 与 ProGlide 血管闭合装置的倾向性匹配比较。
EuroIntervention. 2019 Feb 8;14(15):e1558-e1565. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00769.
9
Percutaneous axillary arteriotomy closure during transcatheter aortic valve replacement using the MANTA device.经皮腋动脉切开术闭合在使用 MANTA 装置行经导管主动脉瓣置换术中的应用。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Nov 1;92(5):998-1001. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27383. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
10
Device success and 30-day clinical outcome in patients undergoing preimplant valvuloplasty in transfemoral versus omitting valvuloplasty in transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经股动脉途径行植入前瓣膜成形术与经心尖途径行导管主动脉瓣置换术时省略瓣膜成形术患者的装置成功率及30天临床结局
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Nov;150(5):1111-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.07.050. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
引用本文的文献
1
Analysis of length of stay after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement: results from the FRANCE TAVI registry.经股动脉主动脉瓣置换术后住院时间分析：来自 FRANCE TAVI 注册研究的结果。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2021 Jan;110(1):40-49. doi: 10.1007/s00392-020-01647-4. Epub 2020 Apr 25.
本文引用的文献
1
Assessment of the MANTA closure device in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a single-centre observational study.经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术中MANTA闭合装置的评估：一项单中心观察性研究。
Neth Heart J. 2020 Dec;28(12):639-644. doi: 10.1007/s12471-020-01465-3.
2
Early mobilisation after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation: results of the MobiTAVI trial.经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣植入术后的早期活动：MobiTAVI试验结果
Neth Heart J. 2020 May;28(5):240-248. doi: 10.1007/s12471-020-01374-5.
3
Insights From a Multidisciplinary Introduction of the MANTA Vascular Closure Device.多学科引入 MANTA 血管闭合装置的见解。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep 9;12(17):1730-1736. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.06.049.
4
Early Outcomes After Percutaneous Closure of Access Site in Transfemoral Transcatheter Valve Implantation Using the Novel Vascular Closure Device Collagen Plug-Based MANTA.使用新型血管闭合装置胶原塞基 MANTA 经股动脉经导管瓣膜植入术后经皮闭合入路的早期结果。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Oct 15;124(8):1265-1271. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.07.030. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
5
Impact of Local Anesthesia Only Versus Procedural Sedation Using the Vancouver Clinical Pathway for TAVR: Insights From the 3M TAVR Study.仅使用局部麻醉与采用温哥华临床路径进行经导管主动脉瓣置换术（TAVR）的程序镇静的比较：来自3M TAVR研究的见解
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 May 27;12(10):1000-1001. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.02.014.
6
Optimising patient discharge management after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the multicentre European FAST-TAVI trial.经股动脉主动脉瓣置换术后患者出院管理的优化：多中心欧洲 FAST-TAVI 试验。
EuroIntervention. 2019 Jun 20;15(2):147-154. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01197.
7
Access site complications after transfemoral aortic valve implantation - a comparison of Manta and ProGlide.经股动脉主动脉瓣植入术后穿刺部位并发症——Manta与ProGlide的比较
CVIR Endovasc. 2018;1(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s42155-018-0026-0. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
8
Propensity-matched comparison of vascular closure devices after transcatheter aortic valve replacement using MANTA versus ProGlide.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后应用 MANTA 与 ProGlide 血管闭合装置的倾向性匹配比较。
EuroIntervention. 2019 Feb 8;14(15):e1558-e1565. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00769.
9
The Sooner the Better?: The Doctor Knows Best.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Sep 10;11(17):1772-1774. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.06.057.
10
Early Versus Standard Discharge After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后早期与标准出院的比较：系统评价和荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Sep 10;11(17):1759-1771. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.04.042.
Zotero 插件