Urogynaecology Unit, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'Alexandra' Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Urogynecology Department, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Climacteric. 2021 Feb;24(1):101-106. doi: 10.1080/13697137.2020.1789092. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
This study aims to assess the effectiveness of the non-ablative photothermal erbium laser (Er:YAG laser) for managing anterior and/or posterior vaginal compartment prolapse.
A randomized, single-blind, 1:1 trial was performed comparing Er:YAG laser treatment to watchful waiting in postmenopausal women with symptomatic cystocele and/or rectocele stage 2 or 3 who opted to undergo surgery due to bothersome prolapse symptoms. Three Er:YAG laser treatments at monthly intervals were applied for the Er:YAG laser group, while there was no treatment for the watchful-waiting group. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with stage 0 or 1 following laser treatment, while secondary outcomes included the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q points), Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory Questionnaire short-form, Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire short-form, and Patients Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I). All outcomes were evaluated at baseline and 4 months post baseline.
Thirty women (15 vs. 15) were eligible to be included. No participants (0%) in either group had POP-Q stage 0 or 1 at 4 months. Moreover, no change was present in the secondary outcomes. In the PGI-I, 2/15 (14%) and 0/15 (0%) participants declared much better/very much better in the laser and watchful-waiting group, respectively.
The findings of this study do not support use of the intravaginal Er:YAG laser for treatment of the anterior/posterior vaginal wall. NCT03714607.
本研究旨在评估非剥脱性光热铒激光(Er:YAG 激光)治疗前阴道和/或后阴道壁脱垂的效果。
一项随机、单盲、1:1 试验,比较 Er:YAG 激光治疗与绝经后女性的观察等待,这些女性患有症状性膀胱膨出和/或直肠膨出 2 或 3 期,由于脱垂症状令人烦恼而选择手术。Er:YAG 激光组每月进行 3 次 Er:YAG 激光治疗,而观察等待组则不进行治疗。主要结局是激光治疗后患者的分期为 0 或 1 的比例,次要结局包括盆腔器官脱垂定量系统(POP-Q 点)、盆底窘迫问卷简表、盆底影响问卷简表和患者整体改善印象(PGI-I)。所有结局均在基线和基线后 4 个月进行评估。
30 名女性(15 名 vs. 15 名)符合入选条件。两组均无 4 个月时 POP-Q 分期为 0 或 1 的患者。此外,次要结局无变化。在 PGI-I 中,激光组有 2/15(14%)和观察等待组有 0/15(0%)的参与者表示改善明显/非常明显。
本研究结果不支持使用阴道内 Er:YAG 激光治疗前阴道和/或后阴道壁。NCT03714607。