• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孟加拉国农村地区少数民族加罗族和桑塔尔族与主流孟加拉族社区对配偶虐待接受程度的差异。

Differences in the acceptance of wife abuse among ethnic minority Garo and Santal and mainstream Bengali communities in rural Bangladesh.

机构信息

Department of Social Work, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi, Bangladesh.

Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Jul 28;15(7):e0236733. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236733. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0236733
PMID:32722707
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7386579/
Abstract

Studies on wife abuse in Bangladesh predominantly include the mainstream Bengali population, although there are at least 27 ethnic minority communities including a few 'female-centered' matrilineal groups living in the country. This study explored ethnic differences in the attitudinal acceptance of wife abuse among matrilineal ethnic minority Garo, patrilineal ethnic minority Santal, and mainstream patriarchal Bengali communities in rural Bangladesh. Adopting a cross-sectional design, the study included 1,929 women and men randomly selected from 24 Garo, Santal, and Bengali villages. Multivariate Poisson regression was performed to predict the number of contextual events, where the respondents attitudinally endorsed wife abuse. Of the sample, 33.2% were from Garo, 33.2% from Santal, and 33.6% from the Bengali communities. The acceptance of wife abuse was high in the sample; specifically, 34.1% of the respondents accepted physical wife abuse, 67.5% accepted emotional abuse, and 71.6% accepted any abuse (either physical or emotional) at least on one contextual reason provided in a 10-item scale. The mean for accepting any abuse was 3.0 (SD = 2.8), emotional abuse 2.3 (SD = 2.2), and physical abuse 0.8 (SD = 1.4). The study showed that the rates of accepting any abuse and physical abuse were respectively 16% and 56% lower among Garo as well as 14% and 33% lower among Santal than that of the Bengali community. Data also revealed that individual level factors like younger age, higher education, prestigious occupation as well as family level factors such as higher income, female mobility, and female family authority were inversely associated with the acceptance of wife abuse in the sample. It appears that the gender regime of a society has a great influence on the attitudes toward wife abuse. We argue that a comprehensive socio-cultural transformation of the patriarchal societies into a gender equal order is imperative for the prevention of widespread wife abuse in the country.

摘要

孟加拉国的关于配偶虐待的研究主要包括主流的孟加拉人,尽管该国至少还有 27 个少数民族社区,其中包括一些以女性为中心的母系群体。本研究探讨了孟加拉国农村地区母系少数民族加罗人、父系少数民族桑塔尔人和主流父权制孟加拉人社区在对配偶虐待的态度接受方面的种族差异。采用横断面设计,研究包括从 24 个加罗、桑塔尔和孟加拉村庄中随机抽取的 1929 名男女。多元泊松回归用于预测受访者在态度上认可配偶虐待的情况下,出现的情境事件数量。在样本中,33.2%来自加罗族,33.2%来自桑塔尔族,33.6%来自孟加拉族社区。样本中对配偶虐待的接受程度较高;具体而言,34.1%的受访者接受身体虐待,67.5%接受情感虐待,71.6%在提供的 10 项量表的至少一个情境原因中接受任何形式的虐待(身体或情感)。接受任何形式的虐待的平均得分为 3.0(标准差=2.8),情感虐待为 2.3(标准差=2.2),身体虐待为 0.8(标准差=1.4)。研究表明,加罗族对任何形式的虐待和身体虐待的接受率分别比孟加拉族低 16%和 56%,桑塔尔族对任何形式的虐待和身体虐待的接受率分别比孟加拉族低 14%和 33%。数据还显示,个体层面的因素,如年龄较小、较高的教育程度、有声望的职业,以及家庭层面的因素,如较高的收入、女性的流动性和女性的家庭权威,与样本中对配偶虐待的接受程度呈负相关。这表明一个社会的性别制度对配偶虐待的态度有很大的影响。我们认为,将父权制社会全面转变为性别平等的社会秩序,对于防止该国普遍存在的配偶虐待至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceb4/7386579/eb3a12d426e4/pone.0236733.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceb4/7386579/eb3a12d426e4/pone.0236733.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceb4/7386579/eb3a12d426e4/pone.0236733.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Differences in the acceptance of wife abuse among ethnic minority Garo and Santal and mainstream Bengali communities in rural Bangladesh.孟加拉国农村地区少数民族加罗族和桑塔尔族与主流孟加拉族社区对配偶虐待接受程度的差异。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 28;15(7):e0236733. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236733. eCollection 2020.
2
Women's Social Mobility and Attitudinal Acceptance of Wife Abuse: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Bengali, Santal, and Garo Ethnic Communities in Rural Bangladesh.孟加拉国农村地区的孟加拉族、桑塔尔族和加罗族社区中的妇女社会流动与对配偶暴力的态度接受:一项横断面研究。
J Interpers Violence. 2024 Apr;39(7-8):1676-1703. doi: 10.1177/08862605231209994. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
3
Gender differences in marital violence: A cross-ethnic study among Bengali, Garo, and Santal communities in rural Bangladesh.婚姻暴力中的性别差异:孟加拉农村地区的孟加拉族、加罗族和桑塔尔族社区的跨民族研究。
PLoS One. 2021 May 19;16(5):e0251574. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251574. eCollection 2021.
4
Gender and Awareness of Laws on Intimate Partner Violence: A Study Among Bengali, Garo, and Santal Ethnic Communities in Rural Bangladesh.性别与亲密伴侣暴力法律意识:孟加拉国农村地区孟加拉族、加罗族和桑塔尔族社区的一项研究。
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Jan;38(1-2):NP613-NP645. doi: 10.1177/08862605221081926. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
5
Does childhood experience of family victimization influence adulthood refusal of wife abuse? Evidence from rural Bangladesh.童年时期的家庭受害经历是否会影响成年后拒绝虐待妻子?来自孟加拉国农村的证据。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 3;16(6):e0252600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252600. eCollection 2021.
6
Married Women's Justification of Intimate Partner Violence in Bangladesh: Examining Community Norm and Individual-Level Risk Factors.孟加拉国已婚女性对亲密伴侣暴力行为的辩解:审视社区规范和个体层面的风险因素。
Violence Vict. 2015;30(6):984-1003. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-14-00066. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
7
Attitudes toward wife beating: a cross-country study in Asia.对殴打妻子行为的态度:亚洲国家的跨国研究。
J Interpers Violence. 2009 Aug;24(8):1371-97. doi: 10.1177/0886260508322182. Epub 2008 Aug 15.
8
Wife abuse in rural Bangladesh.孟加拉国农村地区的家庭暴力。
J Biosoc Sci. 2009 Sep;41(5):561-73. doi: 10.1017/S0021932009990046. Epub 2009 Jun 18.
9
Portuguese immigrant women's perspectives on wife abuse: a cross-generational comparison.葡萄牙移民女性对虐妻行为的看法:跨代比较
J Interpers Violence. 2005 Sep;20(9):1132-50. doi: 10.1177/0886260505278290.
10
Male adolescents' attitudes toward wife beating: a multi-country study in South Asia.男青少年对打老婆的态度:南亚多国研究。
J Adolesc Health. 2012 May;50(5):437-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.09.012. Epub 2011 Dec 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Does childhood experience of family victimization influence adulthood refusal of wife abuse? Evidence from rural Bangladesh.童年时期的家庭受害经历是否会影响成年后拒绝虐待妻子?来自孟加拉国农村的证据。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 3;16(6):e0252600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252600. eCollection 2021.
2
Gender differences in marital violence: A cross-ethnic study among Bengali, Garo, and Santal communities in rural Bangladesh.婚姻暴力中的性别差异:孟加拉农村地区的孟加拉族、加罗族和桑塔尔族社区的跨民族研究。
PLoS One. 2021 May 19;16(5):e0251574. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251574. eCollection 2021.
3
Ethnobotany of Medicinal Plants Used by Rakhine Indigenous Communities in Patuakhali and Barguna District of Southern Bangladesh.

本文引用的文献

1
Attitudes towards domestic violence in 49 low- and middle-income countries: A gendered analysis of prevalence and country-level correlates.49 个中低收入国家对家庭暴力的态度:基于性别视角的流行程度及国家层面关联因素分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 31;13(10):e0206101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206101. eCollection 2018.
2
Is Attitudinal Acceptance of Violence a Risk Factor? An Analysis of Domestic Violence Against Women in Pakistan.态度上接受暴力是一个风险因素吗?对巴基斯坦针对妇女的家庭暴力的分析。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Apr;36(7-8):NP4514-NP4541. doi: 10.1177/0886260518787809. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
3
Examining diffusion to understand the how of SASA!, a violence against women and HIV prevention intervention in Uganda.
孟加拉国南部帕图阿赫利和巴古纳地区若开邦土著社区使用的药用植物民族植物学。
J Evid Based Integr Med. 2020 Jan-Dec;25:2515690X20971586. doi: 10.1177/2515690X20971586.
研究扩散情况,了解 SASA! 如何预防乌干达的暴力侵害妇女和艾滋病毒。
BMC Public Health. 2018 May 11;18(1):616. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5508-4.
4
Justification of Wife Beating in Adolescents: Associated Beliefs and Behaviors.青少年打老婆行为的正当化:相关信念和行为。
Violence Against Women. 2019 Feb;25(2):167-187. doi: 10.1177/1077801218766639. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
5
Women's opinion on the justification of physical spousal violence: A quantitative approach to model the most vulnerable households in Bangladesh.女性对配偶身体暴力正当性的看法:一种对孟加拉国最脆弱家庭进行建模的定量方法。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 21;12(11):e0187884. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187884. eCollection 2017.
6
Wife beating refusal among women of reproductive age in urban and rural Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚城乡育龄妇女中对殴打妻子行为的拒绝情况
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2017 Mar 16;17(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12914-017-0115-5.
7
Men's response to their wives' participation in microfinance: perpetration and justification of intimate partner violence in Bangladesh.男性对其妻子参与小额信贷的反应:孟加拉国亲密伴侣暴力行为的实施与辩解
Public Health. 2016 Dec;141:146-152. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.09.016. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
8
Gender Transformative Approaches to Engaging Men in Gender-Based Violence Prevention: A Review and Conceptual Model.性别转换方法在促进男性参与基于性别的暴力预防中的应用:综述与概念模型。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2018 Apr;19(2):231-246. doi: 10.1177/1524838016650191. Epub 2016 May 18.
9
Microfinance Participation, Control Over Resources, and Justification of IPV: Results From a Nationally Representative Sample of Women.小额信贷参与、资源控制与 IPV 合理化:来自全国女性代表性样本的结果。
J Interpers Violence. 2019 Feb;34(3):475-495. doi: 10.1177/0886260516641284. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
10
Married Women's Justification of Intimate Partner Violence in Bangladesh: Examining Community Norm and Individual-Level Risk Factors.孟加拉国已婚女性对亲密伴侣暴力行为的辩解:审视社区规范和个体层面的风险因素。
Violence Vict. 2015;30(6):984-1003. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-14-00066. Epub 2015 Oct 5.