Suppr超能文献

英国初级保健中静脉性下肢溃疡管理和转诊的调查——EVRA 试验后。

UK primary care survey of venous leg ulceration management and referral - Post-EVRA trial.

机构信息

Imperial Health Care NHS Trust, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Addenbrookes Hospital, Imperial College, Cambridge, London, UK.

出版信息

Phlebology. 2021 Feb;36(1):48-53. doi: 10.1177/0268355520944102. Epub 2020 Jul 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Determine standards of referral and management of patients with venous leg ulceration in primary care after the release of the EVRA (A Randomized Trial of Early Endovenous Ablation in Venous Ulceration) study results.

METHODS

An online questionnaire was disseminated over four months to professionals working within primary care.

RESULTS

The survey received 643 responses. Of respondents, 90 (14%) had heard of the EVRA trial and 51 (8%) were familiar with the results. Of those who answered the following questions, 410 (69.1%) stated that referral to a vascular specialist must be made by the General Practitioner and 13 (2.2%) reported that they would always refer patients for secondary care assessment before the publication of EVRA. Considering the EVRA results, 128 (29%) reported that they would change practice regarding referral and would experience no barriers and 198 (45%) reported that they would like to refer earlier but is not their decision. Barriers to changing practice included local referral policies, training and time restrictions, 266 (59%) had heard of the NICE guideline (CG168) and 194 (43%) were aware of the recommendations for referral to a vascular service within two weeks for patients with an open or healed ulcer.

CONCLUSION

There is a considerable variation in local referral pathways for venous leg ulceration, and despite clinicians wanting to refer promptly, many primary care professionals are unable to. Unfortunately, the EVRA study alone may not change the overall practice, and work is needed to overcome barriers faced by primary care professionals.

摘要

目的

在 EVRA(静脉溃疡早期静脉内消融随机试验)研究结果发布后,确定初级保健中静脉性腿部溃疡患者的转诊和管理标准。

方法

在四个月的时间里,通过在线问卷向初级保健专业人员进行了调查。

结果

该调查共收到 643 份回复。在回答者中,有 90 人(14%)听说过 EVRA 试验,有 51 人(8%)熟悉其结果。在回答以下问题的人中,有 410 人(69.1%)表示必须由全科医生将患者转诊给血管专科医生,有 13 人(2.2%)表示在 EVRA 发布之前,他们将始终将患者转诊到二级护理评估。考虑到 EVRA 的结果,有 128 人(29%)表示他们将改变转诊实践,不会遇到任何障碍,有 198 人(45%)表示他们希望更早转诊,但这不是他们的决定。改变实践的障碍包括当地转诊政策、培训和时间限制,有 266 人(59%)听说过 NICE 指南(CG168),有 194 人(43%)知道对于有开放性或愈合性溃疡的患者,应在两周内将其转诊至血管科的建议。

结论

静脉性腿部溃疡的局部转诊途径存在很大差异,尽管临床医生希望迅速转诊,但许多初级保健专业人员无法做到。不幸的是,仅 EVRA 研究可能不会改变整体实践,需要努力克服初级保健专业人员面临的障碍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/080f/8163521/d4a3564916d8/10.1177_0268355520944102-fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验