Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Lupus Sci Med. 2020 Jul;7(1). doi: 10.1136/lupus-2019-000350.
This study aimed to understand and appraise the approaches taken to handle the complexities of a multisystem disease in published decision-analytic model-based economic evaluations of treatments for SLE. A systematic review was conducted to identify all published model-based economic evaluations of treatments for SLE. Treatments that were considered for inclusion comprised antimalarial agents, immunosuppressive therapies, and biologics including rituximab and belimumab. Medline and Embase were searched electronically from inception until September 2018. Titles and abstracts were screened against the inclusion criteria by two reviewers; agreement between reviewers was calculated according to Cohen's κ. Predefined data extraction tables were used to extract the key features, structural assumptions and data sources of input parameters from each economic evaluation. The completeness of reporting for the methods of each economic evaluation was appraised according to the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement. Six decision-analytic model-based economic evaluations were identified. The studies included azathioprine (n=4), mycophenolate mofetil (n=3), cyclophosphamide (n=2) and belimumab (n=1) as relevant comparator treatments; no economic evaluation estimated the relative cost-effectiveness of rituximab. Six items of the CHEERS statement were reported incompletely across the sample: target population, choice of comparators, measurement and valuation of preference-based outcomes, estimation of resource use and costs, choice of model, and the characterisation of heterogeneity. Complexity in the diagnosis, management and progression of disease can make decision-analytic model-based economic evaluations of treatments for SLE a challenge to undertake. The findings from this study can be used to improve the relevance of model-based economic evaluations in SLE and as an agenda for research to inform future health technology assessment and decision-making.
本研究旨在了解和评估已发表的治疗系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)的基于决策分析模型的经济评估中处理多系统疾病复杂性的方法。系统检索了所有已发表的基于模型的 SLE 治疗经济评估,纳入的治疗方法包括抗疟药物、免疫抑制疗法和生物制剂,如利妥昔单抗和贝利尤单抗。电子检索了 Medline 和 Embase 从建库至 2018 年 9 月的数据。两名评审员根据纳入标准筛选标题和摘要,根据 Cohen's κ 计算评审员之间的一致性。使用预定义的数据提取表从每个经济评估中提取关键特征、结构假设和投入参数的数据来源。根据健康经济评估报告标准(CHEERS)声明评估每个经济评估方法的报告完整性。确定了 6 项基于决策分析模型的经济评估。这些研究包括硫唑嘌呤(n=4)、霉酚酸酯(n=3)、环磷酰胺(n=2)和贝利尤单抗(n=1)作为相关对照治疗;没有经济评估估计利妥昔单抗的相对成本效益。在整个样本中,CHEERS 声明的 6 项内容报告不完整:目标人群、对照选择、偏好结局的测量和估值、资源使用和成本的估计、模型选择以及异质性的描述。疾病的诊断、管理和进展的复杂性可能使治疗 SLE 的基于决策分析模型的经济评估具有挑战性。本研究的结果可用于提高 SLE 基于模型的经济评估的相关性,并为未来的卫生技术评估和决策制定提供研究议程。