Suppr超能文献

抗中性粒细胞胞质抗体相关性血管炎治疗以维持缓解的模拟模型的开发和验证。

Development and Validation of a Simulation Model for Treatment to Maintain Remission in Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis.

机构信息

Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.

出版信息

Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2023 Sep;75(9):1976-1985. doi: 10.1002/acr.25088. Epub 2023 Feb 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Fixed and tailored rituximab retreatment strategies to maintain remission in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) are associated with tradeoffs. The current study was undertaken to develop a simulation model (AAV-Sim) to project clinical outcomes with these strategies.

METHODS

We developed the AAV-Sim, a microsimulation model of clinical events among individuals with AAV initiating treatment to maintain remission. Individuals transition between health states of remission or relapse and are at risk for severe infection, end-stage renal disease, or death. We estimated transition rates from published literature, stratified by individual-level characteristics. We performed validation using the mean average percent error (MAPE) and the coefficient of variation of root mean square error (CV-RMSE). In internal validation, we compared model-projected outcomes over 28 months with outcomes observed in the Rituximab versus Azathioprine in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis 2 (MAINRITSAN2) trial, which compared fixed versus tailored retreatment. In external validation, we compared outcomes with fixed rituximab retreatment from the AAV-Sim to outcomes from the MAINRITSAN1 trial and an observational study.

RESULTS

The AAV-Sim projected outcomes similar to those in the MAINRITSAN2 trial, including minor (AAV-Sim 6.0% fixed versus 7.3% tailored; MAINRITSAN2 6.2% versus 8.6%; MAPE 3% and 15%) and major relapse (AAV-Sim 3.5% versus 5.5%; MAINRITSAN2 3.7% versus 7.4%; MAPE 5% and 26%), severe infection (AAV-Sim 19.4% versus 11.1%; MAINRITSAN2 19.8% versus 10.2%; MAPE 2% and 9%), and relapse-free survival (AAV-Sim 84.8% versus 82.3%; MAINRITSAN2 86% versus 84%; CV-RMSE 2.3% and 2.5%). Similar performance was observed in external validation.

CONCLUSION

The AAV-Sim projected a range of clinical outcomes for different treatment approaches that were validated against published data. The AAV-Sim has the potential to inform management guidelines and research priorities.

摘要

目的

固定和定制利妥昔单抗(rituximab)补救治疗策略以维持抗中性粒细胞胞质抗体(antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody,ANCA)相关性血管炎(AAV)缓解与权衡相关。本研究旨在开发一种模拟模型(AAV-Sim),以预测这些策略的临床结果。

方法

我们开发了 AAV-Sim,这是一种个体起始治疗以维持缓解的 AAV 临床事件的微观模拟模型。个体在缓解或复发的健康状态之间转换,并面临严重感染、终末期肾病或死亡的风险。我们根据个体特征从已发表的文献中估计了转换率。我们使用平均平均百分比误差(mean average percent error,MAPE)和均方根误差变异系数(coefficient of variation of root mean square error,CV-RMSE)进行验证。在内部验证中,我们比较了模型预测的 28 个月的结果与 Rituximab 与 Azathioprine 在 ANCA 相关性血管炎 2(MAINRITSAN2)试验中的观察结果,该试验比较了固定治疗与定制治疗。在外部验证中,我们比较了 AAV-Sim 中固定利妥昔单抗补救治疗的结果与 MAINRITSAN1 试验和一项观察性研究的结果。

结果

AAV-Sim 预测的结果与 MAINRITSAN2 试验相似,包括轻度(AAV-Sim 6.0%固定治疗与 7.3%定制治疗;MAINRITSAN2 6.2%与 8.6%;MAPE 3%与 15%)和重度复发(AAV-Sim 3.5%与 5.5%;MAINRITSAN2 3.7%与 7.4%;MAPE 5%与 26%)、严重感染(AAV-Sim 19.4%与 11.1%;MAINRITSAN2 19.8%与 10.2%;MAPE 2%与 9%)和无复发生存(AAV-Sim 84.8%与 82.3%;MAINRITSAN2 86%与 84%;CV-RMSE 2.3%与 2.5%)。外部验证也观察到了类似的表现。

结论

AAV-Sim 根据已发表的数据对不同治疗方法进行了预测,验证了其预测的一系列临床结果。AAV-Sim 有可能为管理指南和研究重点提供信息。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Cancer screening simulation models: a state of the art review.癌症筛查模拟模型:最新综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Dec 20;21(1):359. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01713-5.
8
U.S. State Life Tables, 2018.美国 2018 年各州生命表
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2021 Mar;70(1):1-18.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验