Suppr超能文献

评估不同 Fitzpatrick 皮肤类型的皮肤敏感性。

Objective Evaluation of Skin Sensitivity Across Fitzpatrick Skin Types.

出版信息

J Drugs Dermatol. 2020 Jul 1;19(7):699-701. doi: 10.36849/JDD.2020.5880.

Abstract

Context: Skin sensitivity may be best defined as self-reported intolerance to application of skincare products. It is commonly believed that individuals with darker skin are generally less sensitive, while those lighter skin are more sensitive. However, there is little objective data correlating sensitivity with skin type or with objective measures of sensitivity. Objective: This study assessed Fitzpatrick skin type and self-reported perception of skin sensitivity. Design: A single-blinded, lactic acid sting test was performed on the medial cheeks, where patients were randomized to receive room temperature 10% lactic acid on the left or right cheek with water applied to the contralateral cheek as a control. Outcome Measures: Stinging was assessed 1 minute after application of test solution to one cheek using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Results: There was a statistically significant difference in self-reported skin sensitivity in patients with Fitzpatrick skin types 1-3 vs 4-6 (73.6% vs 46.5%; P= 0.006). Patients who had higher perceived sensitivity were more likely to have objectively measured sensitivity as well, across all skin types (P<0.01). When stratified by skin type, a numerically higher percentage of subjects with Fitzpatrick skin types 1-3 experienced objective sensitivity compared to subjects with skin types 4-6 (45.6% vs 27.9; P=0.058). Conclusions: Patients with self-perceived skin sensitivity were more likely to develop objective stinging compared to those who did not report sensitivity. Skin sensitivity can occur across all skin types, and patients should be asked about self-perceptions of sensitivity as it is likely an indicator of true sensitivity. J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(7): doi:10.36849/JDD.2020.5880.

摘要

背景

皮肤敏感性最好的定义是自我报告的对护肤品应用的不耐受。人们普遍认为,深色皮肤的人通常不太敏感,而浅色皮肤的人则更敏感。然而,很少有客观数据将敏感性与皮肤类型或敏感性的客观测量相关联。

目的

本研究评估了 Fitzpatrick 皮肤类型和自我报告的皮肤敏感性感知。

设计

在颊内侧进行单盲乳酸刺痛试验,将患者随机分配到左侧或右侧接受室温 10%乳酸,另一侧用清水作为对照。

观察指标

在一侧脸颊涂抹测试溶液 1 分钟后,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估刺痛感。

结果

Fitzpatrick 皮肤类型 1-3 与 4-6 的患者自我报告的皮肤敏感性存在统计学显著差异(73.6% vs 46.5%;P=0.006)。所有皮肤类型中,感知敏感性较高的患者也更有可能具有客观测量的敏感性(P<0.01)。按皮肤类型分层,Fitzpatrick 皮肤类型 1-3 的患者中,客观敏感性的患者比例明显高于皮肤类型 4-6 的患者(45.6% vs 27.9%;P=0.058)。

结论

与没有报告敏感性的患者相比,自我报告皮肤敏感性的患者更有可能出现客观刺痛。敏感性可发生在所有皮肤类型中,应询问患者对自身敏感性的感知,因为这可能是真正敏感性的指标。

皮肤病药物杂志。2020;19(7):10.36849/JDD.2020.5880.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验