• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

格罗宁根气田模拟断层泥的愈合行为及其对诱发断层重新活化的影响

Healing Behavior of Simulated Fault Gouges From the Groningen Gas Field and Implications for Induced Fault Reactivation.

作者信息

Hunfeld Luuk B, Chen Jianye, Hol Sander, Niemeijer André R, Spiers Christopher J

机构信息

HPT Laboratory, Department of Earth Sciences Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands.

Rock and Fluid Science Shell Global Solutions International B.V. Amsterdam The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Geophys Res Solid Earth. 2020 Jul;125(7):e2019JB018790. doi: 10.1029/2019JB018790. Epub 2020 Jun 26.

DOI:10.1029/2019JB018790
PMID:32728508
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7380300/
Abstract

We investigated the frictional strength recovery (healing) and subsequent reactivation and slip-weakening behavior of simulated fault gouges derived from key stratigraphic units in the seismogenic Groningen gas field (N. E. Netherlands). Direct-shear, slide-hold-slide (SHS) experiments were performed at in situ conditions of 100 °C, 40 MPa effective normal stress and 10-15 MPa pore fluid pressure (synthetic formation brine). Sheared gouges were allowed to heal for periods up to 100 days before subsequent reshearing. The initial coefficient of (steady) sliding friction was highest in the Basal Zechstein caprock ( = 0.65 ± 0.02) and Slochteren sandstone reservoir ( = 0.61 ± 0.02) gouges, and the lowest in the Ten Boer claystone at the reservoir top ( = 0.38 ± 0.01) and in the Carboniferous shale substrate ( ≈ 0.45). Healing and subsequent reactivation led to a marked increase () in (static) friction coefficient of up to ~0.16 in Basal Zechstein and ~0.07 in Slochteren sandstone gouges for the longest hold periods investigated, followed by a sharp strength drop (up to ~25%) and slip-weakening trajectory. By contrast, the Ten Boer and Carboniferous gouges showed virtually no healing or strength drop. Healing rates in the Basal Zechstein and Slochteren sandstone gouges were significantly affected by the stiffness of different machines used, in line with the Ruina slip law, and with a microphysical model for gouge healing. Our results point to marked stratigraphic variation in healed frictional strength and healing rate of faults in the Groningen system, and high seismogenic potential of healed faults cutting the reservoir and Basal Zechstein caprock units, upon reactivation.

摘要

我们研究了源自格罗宁根气田(荷兰东北部)关键地层单元的模拟断层泥的摩擦强度恢复(愈合)以及随后的再活化和滑动弱化行为。在100°C、40MPa有效法向应力和10 - 15MPa孔隙流体压力(合成地层盐水)的原位条件下进行了直剪、滑-停-滑(SHS)实验。在后续重新剪切之前,让剪切后的断层泥愈合长达100天。初始(稳态)滑动摩擦系数在基底蔡希斯坦盖层(= 0.65 ± 0.02)和斯洛赫特伦砂岩储层(= 0.61 ± 0.02)断层泥中最高,而在储层顶部的滕布尔粘土岩(= 0.38 ± 0.01)和石炭系页岩基底(≈ 0.45)中最低。愈合和随后的再活化导致基底蔡希斯坦断层泥的(静态)摩擦系数显著增加(),在研究的最长保持时间内增加到约0.16,在斯洛赫特伦砂岩断层泥中增加到约0.07,随后强度急剧下降(高达约25%)并出现滑动弱化轨迹。相比之下,滕布尔和石炭系断层泥几乎没有愈合或强度下降。基底蔡希斯坦和斯洛赫特伦砂岩断层泥的愈合速率受所用不同机器刚度的显著影响,这与瑞纳滑动定律以及断层泥愈合的微观物理模型一致。我们的结果表明,格罗宁根系统中断层的愈合摩擦强度和愈合速率存在显著的地层变化,并且在再活化时,切割储层和基底蔡希斯坦盖层单元的愈合断层具有高地震潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bce/7380300/773915946f2c/JGRB-125-e2019JB018790-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bce/7380300/1ad98792aac2/JGRB-125-e2019JB018790-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bce/7380300/78d7d5b8a809/JGRB-125-e2019JB018790-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bce/7380300/421df20e896c/JGRB-125-e2019JB018790-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bce/7380300/0a65436b8899/JGRB-125-e2019JB018790-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bce/7380300/7c45fc2e29ef/JGRB-125-e2019JB018790-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bce/7380300/b28c033e7a57/JGRB-125-e2019JB018790-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bce/7380300/048e8acefe5c/JGRB-125-e2019JB018790-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bce/7380300/a917badb0cc9/JGRB-125-e2019JB018790-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bce/7380300/550c8c515e1d/JGRB-125-e2019JB018790-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bce/7380300/653afaab4e2f/JGRB-125-e2019JB018790-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bce/7380300/773915946f2c/JGRB-125-e2019JB018790-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bce/7380300/1ad98792aac2/JGRB-125-e2019JB018790-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bce/7380300/78d7d5b8a809/JGRB-125-e2019JB018790-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bce/7380300/421df20e896c/JGRB-125-e2019JB018790-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bce/7380300/0a65436b8899/JGRB-125-e2019JB018790-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bce/7380300/7c45fc2e29ef/JGRB-125-e2019JB018790-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bce/7380300/b28c033e7a57/JGRB-125-e2019JB018790-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bce/7380300/048e8acefe5c/JGRB-125-e2019JB018790-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bce/7380300/a917badb0cc9/JGRB-125-e2019JB018790-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bce/7380300/550c8c515e1d/JGRB-125-e2019JB018790-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bce/7380300/653afaab4e2f/JGRB-125-e2019JB018790-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bce/7380300/773915946f2c/JGRB-125-e2019JB018790-g011.jpg

相似文献

1
Healing Behavior of Simulated Fault Gouges From the Groningen Gas Field and Implications for Induced Fault Reactivation.格罗宁根气田模拟断层泥的愈合行为及其对诱发断层重新活化的影响
J Geophys Res Solid Earth. 2020 Jul;125(7):e2019JB018790. doi: 10.1029/2019JB018790. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
2
Seismic Slip-Pulse Experiments Simulate Induced Earthquake Rupture in the Groningen Gas Field.地震滑动脉冲实验模拟格罗宁根气田诱发地震破裂
Geophys Res Lett. 2021 Jun 16;48(11):e2021GL092417. doi: 10.1029/2021GL092417. Epub 2021 Jun 6.
3
Microphysical Model Predictions of Fault Restrengthening Under Room-Humidity and Hydrothermal Conditions: From Logarithmic to Power-Law Healing.室温湿度及水热条件下断层强化的微观物理模型预测:从对数愈合到幂律愈合
J Geophys Res Solid Earth. 2020 Apr;125(4):e2019JB018567. doi: 10.1029/2019JB018567. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
4
Microphysical Modeling of Carbonate Fault Friction at Slip Rates Spanning the Full Seismic Cycle.跨越整个地震周期滑移速率下碳酸盐岩断层摩擦的微观物理建模
J Geophys Res Solid Earth. 2021 Mar;126(3):e2020JB021024. doi: 10.1029/2020JB021024. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
5
A Discrete Elements Study of the Frictional Behavior of Fault Gouges.断层泥摩擦行为的离散元研究
J Geophys Res Solid Earth. 2023 Jan;128(1):e2022JB025209. doi: 10.1029/2022JB025209. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
6
Fault rock heterogeneity can produce fault weakness and reduce fault stability.断层岩的非均质性会导致断层弱化并降低断层稳定性。
Nat Commun. 2022 Jan 17;13(1):326. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-27998-2.
7
On the effective stress law for rock-on-rock frictional sliding, and fault slip triggered by means of fluid injection.关于岩石与岩石摩擦滑动的有效应力定律以及通过流体注入引发的断层滑动。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2017 Sep 28;375(2103). doi: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0001.
8
Estimation of the Structural and Geomechanical Anisotropy in Fault Gouges Using 3D Micro-Computed Tomography (μ-CT).利用三维微计算机断层扫描(μ-CT)估算断层泥中的结构和地质力学各向异性
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Aug 20;20(17):4706. doi: 10.3390/s20174706.
9
Dynamic weakening of serpentinite gouges and bare surfaces at seismic slip rates.蛇纹岩断层泥和裸露表面在地震滑动速率下的动态弱化
J Geophys Res Solid Earth. 2014 Nov;119(11):8107-8131. doi: 10.1002/2014JB011057. Epub 2014 Nov 17.
10
Fault lubrication during earthquakes.地震时的故障润滑。
Nature. 2011 Mar 24;471(7339):494-8. doi: 10.1038/nature09838.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of mechanical properties of the underburden on induced seismicity along a basement fault during hydrogen storage in a depleted reservoir.枯竭油藏储氢过程中盖层力学性质对基底断层诱发地震活动的影响。
iScience. 2024 Jul 24;27(8):110553. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110553. eCollection 2024 Aug 16.
2
Crustal permeability generated through microearthquakes is constrained by seismic moment.由微地震产生的地壳渗透率受地震矩限制。
Nat Commun. 2024 Mar 6;15(1):2057. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-46238-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Microphysical Model Predictions of Fault Restrengthening Under Room-Humidity and Hydrothermal Conditions: From Logarithmic to Power-Law Healing.室温湿度及水热条件下断层强化的微观物理模型预测:从对数愈合到幂律愈合
J Geophys Res Solid Earth. 2020 Apr;125(4):e2019JB018567. doi: 10.1029/2019JB018567. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
2
An investigation into the role of time-dependent cohesion in interseismic fault restrengthening.时变内聚力在地震间断层再强化中的作用研究。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 9;9(1):9894. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46241-5.
3
Rock Physical Controls on Production-induced Compaction in the Groningen Field.
格罗宁根气田生产诱发压实的岩石物理控制因素
Sci Rep. 2018 May 8;8(1):7156. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25455-z.