Suppr超能文献

基于猪模型中4种修复技术的生物力学比较,改良“十字”领带式缝线修复对桡侧半月板撕裂效果最佳。

Radial Meniscal Tears Are Best Repaired by a Modified "Cross" Tie-Grip Suture Based on a Biomechanical Comparison of 4 Repair Techniques in a Porcine Model.

作者信息

Nakanishi Yuta, Hoshino Yuichi, Nagamune Kouki, Yamamoto Tetsuya, Nagai Kanto, Araki Daisuke, Kanzaki Noriyuki, Matsushita Takehiko, Kuroda Ryosuke

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.

Department of Human and Artificial Intelligent Systems, Graduate School of Engineering, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan.

出版信息

Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Jul 16;8(7):2325967120935810. doi: 10.1177/2325967120935810. eCollection 2020 Jul.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The tie-grip suture can fix radial tears more rigidly than simple conventional sutures. However, one shortcoming is the residual gap at the central margin of the tear. The tie-grip suture was modified to address this issue and named the "cross tie-grip suture."

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to compare the suture stability and strength among 4 suturing techniques: the original tie-grip, cross tie-grip, and 2 conventional sutures (double horizontal and cross). It was hypothesized that the cross tie-grip suture would show the least displacement and resist the greatest maximum load.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

A total of 40 fresh-frozen porcine knees were dissected to acquire 80 menisci; 20 menisci were tested in each suture group. A radial tear was created at the middle third of the meniscal body. Repair was performed with the following: original tie-grip, cross tie-grip, double horizontal, and cross sutures. The mechanical strength of sutured menisci was evaluated using a tensile testing machine. All menisci underwent submaximal loading and load to failure. The gap distance and ultimate failure load were compared using analysis of variance. The failure mode was recorded after load-to-failure testing.

RESULTS

Displacement after 500 cycles was significantly smaller in the cross tie-grip group (0.4 ± 0.3 mm) compared with the tie-grip (0.9 ± 0.6 mm), double horizontal (1.2 ± 0.7 mm), and cross suture groups (1.4 ± 0.6 mm) ( < .05). The ultimate failure load was significantly greater in the cross tie-grip (154.9 ± 29.0 N) and tie-grip (145.2 ± 39.1 N) groups compared with the double horizontal (81.2 ± 19.9 N) and cross suture groups (87.3 ± 17.7 N) ( < .05). Tissue failure was the most common mode of failure in all groups.

CONCLUSION

Upon repair of radial meniscal tears, the cross tie-grip suture showed less displacement compared with that of the tie-grip, double horizontal, and cross sutures and demonstrated equivalent load to failure to that of the tie-grip suture at time zero.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The cross tie-grip suture provided high resistance to displacement after repair of radial tears and may be advantageous in healing for radial meniscal tears.

摘要

背景

与简单的传统缝线相比,套圈缝线能更牢固地固定半月板放射状撕裂。然而,一个缺点是撕裂中央边缘存在残余间隙。对套圈缝线进行了改良以解决此问题,并将其命名为“交叉套圈缝线”。

目的/假设:本研究的目的是比较4种缝合技术(原始套圈缝线、交叉套圈缝线和2种传统缝线(双水平缝线和十字缝线))之间的缝线稳定性和强度。假设交叉套圈缝线的移位最小且能承受最大的极限负荷。

研究设计

对照实验室研究。

方法

共解剖40个新鲜冷冻猪膝关节以获取80个半月板;每个缝线组测试20个半月板。在半月板体部中三分之一处制造一个放射状撕裂。分别用以下方法进行修复:原始套圈缝线、交叉套圈缝线、双水平缝线和十字缝线。使用拉伸试验机评估缝合半月板的机械强度。所有半月板均进行次最大负荷和直至破坏的负荷测试。使用方差分析比较间隙距离和极限破坏负荷。在负荷至破坏测试后记录破坏模式。

结果

与套圈缝线组(0.9±0.6mm)、双水平缝线组(1.2±0.7mm)和十字缝线组(1.4±0.6mm)相比,交叉套圈缝线组在500次循环后的移位明显更小(0.4±0.3mm)(P<0.05)。与双水平缝线组(81.2±19.9N)和十字缝线组(87.3±17.7N)相比,交叉套圈缝线组(154.9±29.0N)和套圈缝线组(145.2±39.1N)的极限破坏负荷明显更大(P<0.05)。组织破坏是所有组中最常见的破坏模式。

结论

在修复半月板放射状撕裂时,与套圈缝线、双水平缝线和十字缝线相比,交叉套圈缝线的移位更小,且在初始时与套圈缝线的破坏负荷相当。

临床意义

交叉套圈缝线在修复半月板放射状撕裂后具有较高的抗移位能力,可能有利于半月板放射状撕裂的愈合。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验