• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

真实世界证据表明,早期同时起始基础胰岛素和胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂与晚期序贯起始相比,在血糖控制方面更有效。

Real-world evidence of the effectiveness on glycaemic control of early simultaneous versus later sequential initiation of basal insulin and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists.

机构信息

Dallas Diabetes Research Center at Medical City, Dallas, Texas, USA.

Department of Medicine, Clinical University Hospital, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020 Dec;22(12):2295-2304. doi: 10.1111/dom.14154. Epub 2020 Sep 2.

DOI:10.1111/dom.14154
PMID:32729183
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7818416/
Abstract

AIM

To assess the impact of the timing of initiating both basal insulin and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) on reaching glycaemic control targets over 6 and 12 months in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) uncontrolled on oral antihyperglycaemic drugs with an HbA1c of 9% or higher.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study assessed the impact of the timing of initiating both basal insulin and GLP-1 RA therapies on reaching glycaemic targets (HbA1c < 7% and <8%, and ≥1% and ≥2% HbA1c reduction) over 12 months in people with markedly uncontrolled T2D (HbA1c ≥ 9%) on oral antihyperglycaemic drugs identified on the Optum Humedica database (electronic medical records; 1 January 2011 to 30 June 2017). Study cohorts were defined by the days between initiating each injectable: cohort A, 30 days or less (simultaneous initiation) and cohorts B, 31-90, C, 91-180, D, 181-270 and E, 271-360 days (sequential initiation).

RESULTS

Cohort A had the best glycaemic outcomes at 6 and 12 months for all four endpoints, followed by cohort B. The likelihood of achieving an HbA1c of less than 7% did not significantly differ between cohorts A and B (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.87 [0.76-1.01]); cohorts C, D and E were significantly less likely to achieve an HbA1c of less than 7% than cohort A (0.62 [0.53-0.72]; 0.62 [0.53-0.72]; 0.63 [0.54-0.73]).

CONCLUSIONS

In people with uncontrolled T2D requiring treatment with a GLP-1 RA and basal insulin, greater improvements in glycaemic control were observed when both therapies were initiated within close proximity of one another (≤90 days) compared with initiation 91-360 days apart.

摘要

目的

评估在口服降糖药物控制不佳(HbA1c >9%)的 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者中,起始基础胰岛素和胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂(GLP-1 RA)的时间对 6 个月和 12 个月时达到血糖控制目标的影响。

方法

本回顾性队列研究评估了在 Optum Humedica 数据库(电子病历;2011 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 6 月 30 日)中,起始基础胰岛素和 GLP-1 RA 治疗的时间对糖化目标(HbA1c<7%和<8%,以及≥1%和≥2%的 HbA1c 降低)的影响,研究人群为口服降糖药物控制不佳的 T2D 患者(HbA1c≥9%)。研究队列根据起始每种注射药物的天数定义:队列 A,30 天或更短(同时起始),队列 B,31-90 天,队列 C,91-180 天,队列 D,181-270 天,队列 E,271-360 天(序贯起始)。

结果

在所有四个终点中,6 个月和 12 个月时,A 队列的血糖控制效果最佳,其次是 B 队列。与 A 队列相比,A 和 B 队列(风险比[95%置信区间]:0.87[0.76-1.01])达到 HbA1c<7%的可能性无显著差异;与 A 队列相比,C、D 和 E 队列达到 HbA1c<7%的可能性显著降低(0.62[0.53-0.72];0.62[0.53-0.72];0.63[0.54-0.73])。

结论

在需要 GLP-1 RA 和基础胰岛素治疗的血糖控制不佳的 T2D 患者中,与起始时间相隔 91-360 天相比,两种治疗方法起始时间接近(≤90 天)时,血糖控制的改善更显著。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b1d/7818416/cb7c6fa99f81/DOM-22-2295-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b1d/7818416/6b4550f1223b/DOM-22-2295-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b1d/7818416/64b7c2173bc8/DOM-22-2295-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b1d/7818416/cb7c6fa99f81/DOM-22-2295-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b1d/7818416/6b4550f1223b/DOM-22-2295-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b1d/7818416/64b7c2173bc8/DOM-22-2295-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b1d/7818416/cb7c6fa99f81/DOM-22-2295-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Real-world evidence of the effectiveness on glycaemic control of early simultaneous versus later sequential initiation of basal insulin and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists.真实世界证据表明,早期同时起始基础胰岛素和胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂与晚期序贯起始相比,在血糖控制方面更有效。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020 Dec;22(12):2295-2304. doi: 10.1111/dom.14154. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
2
A Real-World Observational Study Evaluating the Probability of Glycemic Control with Basal Insulin or Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist in Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.一项评估基础胰岛素或胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂对日本2型糖尿病患者血糖控制概率的真实世界观察性研究。
Diabetes Ther. 2020 Jul;11(7):1481-1496. doi: 10.1007/s13300-020-00836-8. Epub 2020 May 22.
3
Real-world impact of adding a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist compared with basal insulin on metabolic targets in adults living with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease already treated with a sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor: The Impact GLP-1 CKD study.在已经接受钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂治疗的 2 型糖尿病合并慢性肾脏病成人患者中,添加胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂与基础胰岛素相比对代谢目标的实际影响:Impact GLP-1 CKD 研究。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024 Oct;26(10):4674-4683. doi: 10.1111/dom.15834. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
4
Titratable fixed-ratio combination of basal insulin plus a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist: A novel, simplified alternative to premix insulin for type 2 diabetes.基础胰岛素与胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂的可滴定固定比例组合:一种用于 2 型糖尿病的新型简化预混胰岛素替代方案。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021 Jul;23(7):1445-1452. doi: 10.1111/dom.14365. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
5
Glycemic Control Following GLP-1 RA or Basal Insulin Initiation in Real-World Practice: A Retrospective, Observational, Longitudinal Cohort Study.在现实临床实践中起始使用胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RA)或基础胰岛素后的血糖控制:一项回顾性、观察性、纵向队列研究
Diabetes Ther. 2020 Nov;11(11):2629-2645. doi: 10.1007/s13300-020-00905-y. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
6
Impact of Simultaneous Versus Sequential Initiation of Basal Insulin and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists on HbA1c in Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Observational Study.基础胰岛素与胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂同时起始与序贯起始对2型糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白的影响:一项回顾性观察研究
Diabetes Ther. 2020 Apr;11(4):995-1005. doi: 10.1007/s13300-020-00783-4. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
7
Switching to iGlarLixi versus continuation of a daily or weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) in insufficiently controlled type 2 diabetes: A LixiLan-G trial subgroup analysis by HbA1c and GLP-1 RA use at screening.在血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者中,由糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)和筛查时 GLP-1RA 使用情况分层的 LixiLan-G 试验亚组分析:与继续每日或每周使用胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)相比,改用艾塞那肽利司那肽注射液的疗效。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021 Jun;23(6):1331-1341. doi: 10.1111/dom.14345. Epub 2021 May 4.
8
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists compared with basal insulins for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂与基础胰岛素治疗2型糖尿病的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 Feb;19(2):228-238. doi: 10.1111/dom.12805. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
9
Slow Titration and Delayed Intensification of Basal Insulin Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.2 型糖尿病患者基础胰岛素的缓慢滴定和延迟强化。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Apr;24(4):390-400. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.17218. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
10
Real-World Effectiveness of Once-Weekly Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (OW GLP-1RAs) in Comparison with Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors (DPP-4is) for Glycemic Control and Weight Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (RELATE).在 2 型糖尿病患者中比较每周一次胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂(OW GLP-1RAs)与二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂(DPP-4is)的降糖和减重效果的真实世界疗效(RELATE)。
Clin Drug Investig. 2024 Apr;44(4):271-284. doi: 10.1007/s40261-024-01354-2. Epub 2024 Mar 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment satisfaction and time in range after 16 weeks of treatment with iGlarLixi in insulin-naive adults with suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes.在初治的2型糖尿病控制欠佳的成年患者中,使用iGlarLixi治疗16周后的治疗满意度及血糖达标时间。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 May;27(5):2523-2530. doi: 10.1111/dom.16251. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
2
Population profile and glycemic control following initiation or switch of injectable therapies in Tianjin, China: A real-world retrospective cohort study of adults with type 2 diabetes.中国天津启动或更换注射治疗后的人群概况及血糖控制:一项针对 2 型糖尿病成年人的真实世界回顾性队列研究。
J Diabetes Investig. 2025 May;16(5):842-851. doi: 10.1111/jdi.14415. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Addendum. 7. Diabetes Technology: . Diabetes Care 2020;43(Suppl. 1):S77-S88.附录7.糖尿病技术:《糖尿病护理》2020年;43(增刊1):S77 - S88。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Aug;43(8):1981. doi: 10.2337/dc20-ad08c. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
2
Impact of Simultaneous Versus Sequential Initiation of Basal Insulin and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists on HbA1c in Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Observational Study.基础胰岛素与胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂同时起始与序贯起始对2型糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白的影响:一项回顾性观察研究
Diabetes Ther. 2020 Apr;11(4):995-1005. doi: 10.1007/s13300-020-00783-4. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
3
Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).
Simultaneous Versus Sequential Initiation of Lixisenatide and Basal Insulin for Type 2 Diabetes: Subgroup Analysis of a Japanese Post-Marketing Surveillance Study of Lixisenatide (PRANDIAL).
利西那肽与基础胰岛素同时或序贯起始治疗 2 型糖尿病:利西那肽(PRANDIAL)日本上市后监测研究的亚组分析
Adv Ther. 2022 Dec;39(12):5453-5473. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02311-1. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
4
Rationale for the Use of Combination Injectable Therapy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Who Have High A1C (≥9%) and/or Long Duration (>8 Years): Executive Summary.对于糖化血红蛋白(A1C)水平高(≥9%)和/或病程长(>8年)的2型糖尿病患者使用联合注射治疗的基本原理:执行摘要。
Clin Diabetes. 2021 Apr;39(2):141-145. doi: 10.2337/cd20-0121.
5
From glucose lowering agents to disease/diabetes modifying drugs: a "SIMPLE" approach for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.从降糖药到疾病/糖尿病修饰药物:治疗 2 型糖尿病的“SIMPLE”方法。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021 Apr 28;20(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12933-021-01281-y.
6
Translating iGlarLixi Evidence for the Management of Frequent Clinical Scenarios in Type 2 Diabetes.iGlarLixi 在 2 型糖尿病频繁临床场景管理中的证据转化。
Adv Ther. 2021 Apr;38(4):1715-1731. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01614-5. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
2018 年美国糖尿病协会(ADA)和欧洲糖尿病研究协会(EASD)的共识报告:2 型糖尿病患者高血糖的管理。
Diabetologia. 2018 Dec;61(12):2461-2498. doi: 10.1007/s00125-018-4729-5.
4
Probability of Achieving Glycemic Control with Basal Insulin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Real-World Practice in the USA.在美国现实临床实践中,2型糖尿病患者使用基础胰岛素实现血糖控制的概率
Diabetes Ther. 2018 Jun;9(3):1347-1358. doi: 10.1007/s13300-018-0413-5. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
5
Impact of delaying treatment intensification with a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist in patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on basal insulin: A longitudinal study of a US administrative claims database.在基础胰岛素控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者中延迟胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂治疗强化对治疗的影响:一项美国行政索赔数据库的纵向研究。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Apr;20(4):831-839. doi: 10.1111/dom.13156. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
6
, 10th Revision, Coding for Diabetes.第10次修订,糖尿病编码。
Clin Diabetes. 2017 Oct;35(4):232-238. doi: 10.2337/cd16-0052.
7
Automated detection and classification of type 1 versus type 2 diabetes using electronic health record data.使用电子健康记录数据自动检测和分类 1 型与 2 型糖尿病。
Diabetes Care. 2013 Apr;36(4):914-21. doi: 10.2337/dc12-0964. Epub 2012 Nov 27.