Center for Clinical Metabolic Research, Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark.
Center for Clinical Metabolic Research, Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Bone. 2020 Nov;140:115553. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115553. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
The incretin hormones glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) are well known for their insulinotropic effects and they are thought to affect bone homeostasis as mediators in the so-called entero-osseous axis. We examined the contributions of endogenous GIP and GLP-1, respectively, to postprandial bone homeostasis, in healthy subjects in two randomized and double-blind crossover studies. We included healthy men who received either four oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) (n = 18, median age 27 (range 20-70), BMI 27.2 (22.4-37.0) kg/m) or liquid mixed meal tests (MMTs) (n = 12, age 23 (19-65), BMI 23.7 (20.3-25.5) kg/m) with infusions of 1) the GIP receptor antagonist GIP(3-30)NH, 2) the GLP-1 receptor antagonist exendin(9-39)NH, 3) both GIP(3-30)NH and exendin(9-39)NH, or 4) placebo infusions (saline) on four separate visits. Bone resorption was evaluated from levels of circulating carboxy-terminal collagen crosslinks (CTX) and bone formation from levels of procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide (P1NP). During placebo infusions, baseline-subtracted area under the curve values for CTX were -39 ± 5.0 (OGTT) and -57 ± 4.3 ng/ml × min (MMT). When GIP(3-30)NH was administered, CTX suppression was significantly diminished compared to placebo (-30 ± 4.8 (OGTT) and -45 ± 4.6 ng/ml × min (MMT), P = 0.0104 and P = 0.0288, respectively, compared to placebo. During exendin(9-39)NH infusion, CTX suppression after OGTT/MMT was similar to placebo (P = 0.28 (OGTT) and P = 0.93 (MMT)). The relative contribution of endogenous GIP to postprandial suppression of bone resorption during both OGTT and MMT was similar and reached 22-25%. There were no differences in P1NP concentrations between interventions. In conclusion, endogenous GIP contributes by up to 25% to postprandial suppression of bone resorption in humans whereas an effect of endogenous GLP-1 could not be demonstrated.
肠促胰岛素激素葡萄糖依赖性胰岛素促分泌多肽(GIP)和胰高血糖素样肽 1(GLP-1)以其胰岛素促分泌作用而闻名,它们被认为通过所谓的肠骨轴作为介质影响骨稳态。我们在两项随机、双盲交叉研究中,分别检查了内源性 GIP 和 GLP-1 对健康受试者餐后骨稳态的贡献。我们纳入了接受以下四项干预措施之一的健康男性:1)GIP 受体拮抗剂 GIP(3-30)NH,2)GLP-1 受体拮抗剂 exendin(9-39)NH,3)GIP(3-30)NH 和 exendin(9-39)NH,或 4)安慰剂输注(生理盐水),分别在四次单独访视中进行。通过循环羧基末端胶原交联物(CTX)水平评估骨吸收,通过原胶原 I 型氨基末端前肽(P1NP)水平评估骨形成。在安慰剂输注期间,CTX 的基线减去 AUC 值为 -39±5.0(OGTT)和 -57±4.3ng/ml×min(MMT)。当给予 GIP(3-30)NH 时,CTX 抑制作用与安慰剂相比明显减弱(OGTT:-30±4.8ng/ml×min 和 MMT:-45±4.6ng/ml×min,P=0.0104 和 P=0.0288,与安慰剂相比)。在 exendin(9-39)NH 输注期间,OGTT/MMT 后 CTX 抑制作用与安慰剂相似(OGTT:P=0.28,MMT:P=0.93)。内源性 GIP 对 OGTT 和 MMT 餐后骨吸收抑制的相对贡献相似,达到 22-25%。干预之间的 P1NP 浓度没有差异。结论:内源性 GIP 对人类餐后骨吸收抑制的贡献高达 25%,而内源性 GLP-1 的作用则无法证明。